Case study:Brent Lodge Park Improvement: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(17 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Project overview | {{Project overview | ||
|Status= | |Status=Planned | ||
|Themes=Economic aspects, Environmental flows and water resources, Habitat and biodiversity | |||
|Country=England | |Country=England | ||
|Main contact forename=Neale | |Main contact forename=Neale | ||
|Main contact surname=Hider | |Main contact surname=Hider | ||
|Contact organisation=Environment Agency | |Contact organisation=Environment Agency | ||
|Contact organisation url=www.gov.uk/government/organisations/environment-agency | |||
|Multi-site=No | |Multi-site=No | ||
|Project summary= | |Project summary=Aiming to encourage the River Brent back along the original channel route through Brent Lodge Park. | ||
Aim of scheme:<br>- enhancement of tidal defences<br>- conservation enhancements<br>- recreation provision<br>Work undertaken:<br>- cleaning up of existing foreshore<br>- creation of new shingle beach<br>- attachment of horizontal and vertical timbers to promote algal growth<br>- reed planting in Bullhead dock<br>- reducing size of jetty increasing direct light to the foreshore <br> | |||
Neale Hider: 07/01/2009 | |||
“The Brent Lodge Park river restoration is more like an improvement after our consultation with Jacobs. | |||
We cannot reinstate the double meander (original course) as originally planned due to the contaminated waste that it had been back filled with. Instead we have outlined a different course for the meander to run (and break the river away from its current straight path) while retaining the old channel as a backwater/flood relief channel.” | |||
|Monitoring surveys and results=Photographs pre-works<br>Pre-project data: specify above | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Image_gallery}} | {{Image_gallery}} | ||
Line 25: | Line 34: | ||
{{Toggle_button}} | {{Toggle_button}} | ||
{{Toggle_content_start}} | {{Toggle_content_start}} | ||
{{ | {{Case study subcatchment | ||
|Subcatchment= | |Subcatchment=Brent (below Silk stream down to the Thames) | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Site | {{Site | ||
|WFD water body code=GB106039023590 | |||
|WFD water body name=Brent (below Silk stream down to the Thames) | |||
|Heavily modified water body=No | |||
|Protected species present=No | |||
|WFD water body code= | |Invasive species present=No | ||
|WFD water body name= | |||
|Heavily modified water body= | |||
|Protected species present= | |||
|Invasive species present= | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Project_background | {{Project_background | ||
Line 158: | Line 117: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Motivations | {{Motivations | ||
| | |Specific mitigation=Pollution incident | ||
|Hydromorphological quality elements=Channel pattern/planform, Quantity & dynamics of flow, Width & depth variation | |||
|Physico-chemical quality elements=Nutrient concentrations | |||
| | |||
|Physico-chemical quality elements= | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Measures | {{Measures | ||
|Bank and bed modifications measure= | |Bank and bed modifications measure=Deculverting, Removing of concrete structures | ||
|Floodplain / River corridor=Reedbed creation | |||
|Planform / Channel pattern=Creation of backwater | |||
|Social measures=Aesthetics | |||
|Floodplain / River corridor= | |||
|Planform / Channel pattern= | |||
|Social measures= | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}} | {{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}} |
Latest revision as of 16:20, 13 December 2016
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Project overview
Status | Planned |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Economic aspects, Environmental flows and water resources, Habitat and biodiversity |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Neale |
Main contact surname | Hider |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Environment Agency |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/environment-agency |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
Aiming to encourage the River Brent back along the original channel route through Brent Lodge Park.
Aim of scheme:
- enhancement of tidal defences
- conservation enhancements
- recreation provision
Work undertaken:
- cleaning up of existing foreshore
- creation of new shingle beach
- attachment of horizontal and vertical timbers to promote algal growth
- reed planting in Bullhead dock
- reducing size of jetty increasing direct light to the foreshore
Neale Hider: 07/01/2009 “The Brent Lodge Park river restoration is more like an improvement after our consultation with Jacobs. We cannot reinstate the double meander (original course) as originally planned due to the contaminated waste that it had been back filled with. Instead we have outlined a different course for the meander to run (and break the river away from its current straight path) while retaining the old channel as a backwater/flood relief channel.”
Monitoring surveys and results
Photographs pre-works
Pre-project data: specify above
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Other case studies in this subcatchment: Boston Manor, Brent River Park Phase II, Clitherow's Island, Brentford eel pass, Osterley Weir, Hanwell eel pass, Stonebridge Estate, Stoney Sluice, Brentford eel pass, Thames Lock Weir, Brentford eel pass
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|