Case study:Ravensbury Park: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(14 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
|Location=51.392463684082, -0.168462008237839 | |Location=51.392463684082, -0.168462008237839 | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{Project overview | ||
|Status= | |Status=Planned | ||
|Themes=Fisheries, Social benefits | |||
|Country=England | |||
|Main contact forename=Joanna | |||
|Main contact surname=Heisse | |||
|Contact organisation=Environment Agency | |||
|Themes= | |Contact organisation url=www.gov.uk/government/organisations/environment-agency | ||
|Partner organisations=Environment Agency, Merton Council | |||
|Country= | |Multi-site=No | ||
|Project summary=Bank naturalisation and enhancements; tree works; backwater enhancement. The river through the park has hard edges which could be enhanced to create more of a marginal edge. Several channels run through the park which could be enhanced to improve their value as wildlife corridors. | |||
|Main contact forename= | |||
|Main contact surname= | |||
|Contact organisation= | |||
|Contact organisation url= | |||
|Partner organisations= | |||
|Multi-site= | |||
|Project summary= | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Image_gallery}} | {{Image_gallery}} | ||
Line 50: | Line 28: | ||
{{Toggle_button}} | {{Toggle_button}} | ||
{{Toggle_content_start}} | {{Toggle_content_start}} | ||
{{ | {{Case study subcatchment | ||
|Subcatchment= | |Subcatchment=Wandle (Croydon to Wandsworth) and the R. Gravney | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Site | {{Site | ||
|WFD water body code=GB106039023460 | |||
|WFD water body name=Wandle (Croydon to Wandsworth) and the R. Gravney | |||
|Heavily modified water body=No | |||
|Protected species present=No | |||
|WFD water body code= | |Invasive species present=No | ||
|WFD water body name= | |||
|Heavily modified water body= | |||
|Protected species present= | |||
|Invasive species present= | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{Project background | ||
|Reach length directly affected= | |Reach length directly affected=300 m | ||
|Project started=2008/01/01 | |||
|Funding sources=Viridor funding, Thames Water rehabilitation fund | |||
|Project started= | |||
|Funding sources= | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Motivations | {{Motivations | ||
|Specific mitigation=Riparian development | |||
|Specific mitigation= | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Measures | {{Measures | ||
|Bank and bed modifications measure= | |Bank and bed modifications measure=Bank reprofiling | ||
|Floodplain / River corridor=Tree management | |||
|Planform / Channel pattern=Creation of backwater | |||
|Floodplain / River corridor= | |||
|Planform / Channel pattern= | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}} | {{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}} |
Latest revision as of 13:46, 1 November 2018
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Project overview
Status | Planned |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Fisheries, Social benefits |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Joanna |
Main contact surname | Heisse |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Environment Agency |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/environment-agency |
Partner organisations | Environment Agency, Merton Council |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
Bank naturalisation and enhancements; tree works; backwater enhancement. The river through the park has hard edges which could be enhanced to create more of a marginal edge. Several channels run through the park which could be enhanced to improve their value as wildlife corridors.
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Other case studies in this subcatchment: Beddington Park, Beddington Park Enhancements, Boulder Pool and Plough Lane, Durand Close, EDF Weir removal, Eel Pass over tilting weir at Ravensbury Park, Garratt Park, Hackbridge Restoration, Hackbridge weir notch, King Georges Park... further results
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|