Case study:Ching Brook at Walthamstow Greyhound Stadium: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(XML import) |
No edit summary |
||
(11 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{Case study status | ||
|Approval status= | |Approval status=Approved | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Location | {{Location | ||
|Location= | |Location=51.6027641296386, -0.0130788739770651 | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{Project overview | ||
|Status= | |Status=Planned | ||
|Themes=Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Social benefits | |||
|Country=England | |||
|Main contact forename=Kevin | |||
|Main contact surname=Reid | |||
|Contact organisation=Greater London Authority | |||
|Themes= | |Contact organisation url=https://www.london.gov.uk/ | ||
|Multi-site=No | |||
|Country= | |Project picture=Gla-1000.png | ||
|Project summary=The restoration of this section will be a significant step in restoring this relatively short brook to a more natural state on its way to its confluence with the River Lee. The brook has been culverted since the development of the stadium in the 1930s. The area has suffered localised flooding from the stream which has an upstream catchment mostly consisting of parkland and Epping Forest. | |||
|Main contact forename= | |||
|Main contact surname= | |||
|Contact organisation= | |||
|Contact organisation url= | |||
|Multi-site= | |||
|Project picture= | |||
|Project summary= | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Image_gallery}} | {{Image_gallery}} | ||
Line 53: | Line 21: | ||
{{Toggle_button}} | {{Toggle_button}} | ||
{{Toggle_content_start}} | {{Toggle_content_start}} | ||
{{ | {{Case study subcatchment | ||
|Subcatchment= | |Subcatchment=Ching Brook | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Site | {{Site | ||
|WFD water body code=GB106038027930 | |||
|WFD water body name=Ching Brook | |||
|Heavily modified water body=No | |||
|Protected species present=No | |||
|WFD water body code= | |Invasive species present=No | ||
|WFD water body name= | |||
|Heavily modified water body= | |||
|Protected species present= | |||
|Invasive species present= | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Project_background | {{Project_background | ||
Line 186: | Line 104: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Motivations | {{Motivations | ||
| | |Specific mitigation=Flood risk management | ||
|Hydromorphological quality elements=Channel pattern/planform, Width & depth variation | |||
| | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Measures | {{Measures | ||
|Bank and bed modifications measure= | |Bank and bed modifications measure=Deculverting | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}} | {{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}} |
Latest revision as of 13:36, 2 January 2019
Location: 51° 36' 9.95" N, 0° 0' 47.08" W
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.
Project overview
Status | Planned |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Social benefits |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Kevin |
Main contact surname | Reid |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Greater London Authority |
Contact organisation web site | http://https://www.london.gov.uk/ |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
Edit project overview to modify the project summary.
The restoration of this section will be a significant step in restoring this relatively short brook to a more natural state on its way to its confluence with the River Lee. The brook has been culverted since the development of the stadium in the 1930s. The area has suffered localised flooding from the stream which has an upstream catchment mostly consisting of parkland and Epping Forest.
Monitoring surveys and results
This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Lessons learnt
This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|