Case study:Dagenham Brook de-silting: Difference between revisions
(XML import) |
No edit summary |
||
(15 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{Case study status | ||
|Approval status= | |Approval status=Approved | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Location | {{Location | ||
|Location= | |Location=51.5767669677734, -0.0405098907649517 | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{Project overview | ||
|Status= | |Status=Complete | ||
|Themes=Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity | |||
|Country=England | |||
|Main contact forename=Colin | |||
|Main contact surname=Street | |||
|Contact organisation=Environment Agency | |||
|Themes= | |Contact organisation url=www.gov.uk/government/organisations/environment-agency | ||
|Multi-site=No | |||
|Country= | |Project picture=Dagenham-Brook-Dredge-Land-Water-Case-Study.jpg | ||
|Project summary=Reduce flood risk improve channel conveyancing, improve health and safety for light water course maintenance. Reduce flood risk and channel capacity, remove dangerous deep pockets of heavily contaminated silts. WFD driven. | |||
|Main contact forename= | |||
A 1.5km long ditch, which historically had been over dredged and subsequently not been maintained for years due to difficult access and inconsistent deep silt, required an over haul. | |||
|Main contact surname= | |||
It was anticipated that there was 4,400t of silt to be removed, half of which was expected to be hazardous Land and Water Services could see flaws in the historic silt test results and therefore undertook additional sampling and detailed testing which enabled the silt to be reclassified as 100% non-hazardous. Furthermore rather than dredging down to the previously over dredged hard bed level, Land & Water designed a solution which reduced the volume of silt to be removed, and therefore the cost of the works, but provided the Environment Agency with a firm and level bed for future access and maintenance (*1) | |||
|Contact organisation= | |||
|Contact organisation url= | |||
|Multi-site= | |||
|Project picture= | |||
| | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Image_gallery}} | {{Image_gallery}} | ||
Line 53: | Line 25: | ||
{{Toggle_button}} | {{Toggle_button}} | ||
{{Toggle_content_start}} | {{Toggle_content_start}} | ||
{{ | {{Case study subcatchment | ||
|Subcatchment= | |Subcatchment=Lee (from Tottenham Locks to the Tideway) | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Site | {{Site | ||
|WFD water body code=GB106038077852 | |||
|WFD water body name=Lee (from Tottenham Locks to the Tideway) | |||
|Heavily modified water body=No | |||
|Protected species present=No | |||
|WFD water body code= | |Invasive species present=No | ||
|WFD water body name= | |||
|Heavily modified water body= | |||
|Protected species present= | |||
|Invasive species present= | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{Project background | ||
|Reach length directly affected= | |Reach length directly affected=2000 m | ||
|Project started=2009/01/01 | |||
|Works completed=2009/01/01 | |||
|Total cost category=100 - 500 k€ | |||
|Project started= | |Funding sources=Environment Agency Flood and Coastal Risk Management, | ||
|Works completed= | |||
|Total cost category= | |||
|Funding sources= | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Motivations | {{Motivations | ||
| | |Specific mitigation=Flood risk management | ||
|Physico-chemical quality elements=Specific non-synthetic pollutants, Specific synthetic pollutants | |||
|Physico-chemical quality elements= | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Measures | {{Measures | ||
|Bank and bed modifications measure= | |Bank and bed modifications measure=Removal of sediment | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}} | {{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}} | ||
Line 229: | Line 61: | ||
{{Additional_Documents}} | {{Additional_Documents}} | ||
{{Additional_Documents_end}} | {{Additional_Documents_end}} | ||
{{ | {{Additional links and references header}} | ||
{{Additional links and references | |||
|Link=http://www.land-water.co.uk/dredging-dagenham-brook | |||
|Description=1 | |||
}} | |||
{{Additional_links_and_references_footer}} | {{Additional_links_and_references_footer}} | ||
{{Supplementary_Information | {{Supplementary_Information |
Latest revision as of 12:43, 1 November 2018
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Colin |
Main contact surname | Street |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Environment Agency |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/environment-agency |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
Reduce flood risk improve channel conveyancing, improve health and safety for light water course maintenance. Reduce flood risk and channel capacity, remove dangerous deep pockets of heavily contaminated silts. WFD driven.
A 1.5km long ditch, which historically had been over dredged and subsequently not been maintained for years due to difficult access and inconsistent deep silt, required an over haul.
It was anticipated that there was 4,400t of silt to be removed, half of which was expected to be hazardous Land and Water Services could see flaws in the historic silt test results and therefore undertook additional sampling and detailed testing which enabled the silt to be reclassified as 100% non-hazardous. Furthermore rather than dredging down to the previously over dredged hard bed level, Land & Water designed a solution which reduced the volume of silt to be removed, and therefore the cost of the works, but provided the Environment Agency with a firm and level bed for future access and maintenance (*1)
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Other case studies in this subcatchment: Blackhorse Lane Waterfront Park, Essex Wharf, Hackney Marsh recreation grounds, Hackney Marshes - Wick Field recreation ground, Lea Bridge Waterway Wall Improvements, Lee Navigation by Walthamstow Marshes, Springfield Marina, Tottenham Lock Floating Ecosystem
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|