Case study:Wansbeck 100: Difference between revisions
(Replaced content with "{{Case study subcatchment |Subcatchment=Wansbeck from Source to Ray Burn }}") |
No edit summary |
||
(10 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Case study status | |||
|Approval status=Approved | |||
}} | |||
{{Location | |||
|Location=55.78062774182665, -2.078990936279297 | |||
}} | |||
{{Project overview | |||
|Status=Complete | |||
|Themes=Water quality | |||
|Country=England | |||
|Main contact forename=Peter | |||
|Main contact surname=Kerr | |||
|Contact organisation=Northumberland Rivers Trust | |||
|Partner organisations=National Trust, Environment Agency, Community Foundation | |||
|Name of parent multi-site project=Case_study:Wansbeck 100 | |||
|Multi-site=Yes | |||
|Project summary=The Wansbeck and many of its tributaries are currently viewed as ‘failing’ under the requirements of the Water Framework Directive (WFD). The main reason for failure is numbers of fish. | |||
The main issue behind this appears to be the amount of silt, sediment and nutrients that are washed into the rivers and streams from farmland and forests. Other factors include weirs that hold up fish migration, and a lack of bank-side and in-stream habitat. | |||
This ambitious community project aims to help address these issues, and improve the quality, WFD status and local enjoyment of 100km of river and stream. | |||
The rivers and streams that are part of the project include:The Upper Wansbeck; The Font; The Hartburn; The Delf Burn; The Ray Burn. | |||
The project will work closely with schools and communities to help renew local interest and ‘ownership’ of the rivers in this rural part of Northumberland. | |||
Outputs will include: improvements to fish passage; lengths of fenced buffer strip to filter out sediments; new and improved wetland features to settle out sediment and nutrients; improvements to vehicle crossings; new native woodland; work with farmers and land managers to reduce run-off in ways that reduce their costs; engagement and communications activity with schools, communities and angling clubs. | |||
}} | |||
{{Image gallery}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=Wansbeck.JPG | |||
|Caption=During works | |||
}} | |||
{{Image gallery end}} | |||
{{Toggle button}} | |||
{{Toggle content start}} | |||
{{Case study subcatchment | {{Case study subcatchment | ||
|Subcatchment=Wansbeck from Source to Ray Burn | |Subcatchment=Wansbeck from Source to Ray Burn | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Site | |||
|Name=Wansbeck | |||
|WFD water body code=GB103022076960 | |||
|WFD water body name=Wansbeck from Source to Ray Burn | |||
|Heavily modified water body=No | |||
|Protected species present=No | |||
|Invasive species present=No | |||
}} | |||
{{Project background | |||
|Reach length directly affected=100,000 | |||
|Project started=2012/07/01 | |||
|Project completed=2015/03/31 | |||
|Total cost category=100 - 500 k€ | |||
|Total1 cost=465 | |||
|Funding sources=Defra Catchment Restoration Fund, | |||
}} | |||
{{Motivations | |||
|Specific mitigation=Water quality, | |||
|Hydromorphological quality elements=Continuity for organisms | |||
|Biological quality elements=Fish | |||
|Physico-chemical quality elements=Nutrient concentrations | |||
|Other motivation=Improved farming practices; Improved community involvement, knowledge and ownership. | |||
}} | |||
{{Measures | |||
|Bank and bed modifications measure=Fenced off riverbank, Weir removal, | |||
|Floodplain / River corridor=Creation of wet woodland, Creation of wetland, Riparian planting, | |||
|Other technical measure=Hardened crossing points | |||
|Social measures=Community involvement, Engagement with schools, | |||
|Wider stakeholder / citizen engagement=Work with farmers and land managers | |||
}} | |||
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} | |||
{{End table}} | |||
{{Biological quality elements header}} | |||
{{End table}} | |||
{{Physico-chemical quality elements header}} | |||
{{End table}} | |||
{{Other responses header}} | |||
{{End table}} | |||
{{Monitoring documents}} | |||
{{Case study monitoring documents | |||
|Monitoring document=NO004 monitoring framework table.docx | |||
|Description=RRC Monitoring table - Wansbeck | |||
}} | |||
{{Monitoring documents end}} | |||
{{Additional Documents}} | |||
{{Case study documents | |||
|File name=CRF019 Project Briefing Note - Wansbeck 100.pdf | |||
|Description=Project briefing note | |||
}} | |||
{{Additional Documents end}} | |||
{{Additional links and references header}} | |||
{{Additional links and references footer}} | |||
{{Supplementary Information}} | |||
{{Toggle content end}} |
Latest revision as of 13:52, 5 June 2017
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Water quality |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Peter |
Main contact surname | Kerr |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Northumberland Rivers Trust |
Contact organisation web site | |
Partner organisations | National Trust, Environment Agency, Community Foundation |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
Wansbeck 100 |
Project summary
The Wansbeck and many of its tributaries are currently viewed as ‘failing’ under the requirements of the Water Framework Directive (WFD). The main reason for failure is numbers of fish.
The main issue behind this appears to be the amount of silt, sediment and nutrients that are washed into the rivers and streams from farmland and forests. Other factors include weirs that hold up fish migration, and a lack of bank-side and in-stream habitat.
This ambitious community project aims to help address these issues, and improve the quality, WFD status and local enjoyment of 100km of river and stream.
The rivers and streams that are part of the project include:The Upper Wansbeck; The Font; The Hartburn; The Delf Burn; The Ray Burn.
The project will work closely with schools and communities to help renew local interest and ‘ownership’ of the rivers in this rural part of Northumberland.
Outputs will include: improvements to fish passage; lengths of fenced buffer strip to filter out sediments; new and improved wetland features to settle out sediment and nutrients; improvements to vehicle crossings; new native woodland; work with farmers and land managers to reduce run-off in ways that reduce their costs; engagement and communications activity with schools, communities and angling clubs.
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|