Case study:Restoration of the longitudinal continuity along the Canche and its classified tributaries: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{Case study status | ||
|Approval status= | |Approval status=Approved | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Location | {{Location | ||
|Location= | |Location=50.4926677, 1.712214800000051 | ||
}} | |||
{{Project overview | |||
|Status=Complete | |||
|Themes=Habitat and biodiversity, Monitoring, Water quality | |||
|Country=France | |||
|Main contact forename=Herve | |||
|Main contact surname=Regniez | |||
|Contact organisation=Syndicat mixte pour le SAGE de la Canche | |||
|Multi-site=No | |||
|Project picture=4.crequoise.jpg | |||
|Picture description=A weir after restoration of the river bed. | |||
|Project summary=The Canche is a small 90 kilometers long river, which sources are at Gouy-en-Ternois , at an altitude of 135 m. It flows into the English Channel 20 km north of the Somme bay. | |||
Its watershed is mainly composed of meadows and wooded areas. The majority of tributaries (Ternoise , Planquette, Créquoise Bras de Bronne, Course, Dordogne and Huitrepin) lie on its right side. These rivers offer a variety of habitats suitable for spawning and development of migratory fish. They still host salmon, sea trout, eel, river lamprey (Lampetra fluviatilis) and sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus). | |||
The Canche has been classified as "migratory fish watercourse" since 1986 , and its tributaries have been since 1997. However, the Canche basin presents many barriers to flow and fish migration. 151 structures were identified and 77 are impassable by migratory fish. These are weirs of former flour mills, or for irrigation, or sluices. In addition to their effects on blocking fish migration, these barriers contribute to the degradation of aquatic habitats. | |||
Streams classified by the prefect, under Article L.432 -6 of the Environmental Code, had to ensure continuity for fish within a period of five years after the publication of the decree. The departmental angling federation started in 1999 the implementation of measures to make some barriers compliant. At the end of 2002 , the “syndicat mixte pour le SAGE de la Canche" (grouping of local administrations having the responsibility to implement the Canche basin plan) to take a specific jurisdiction to ensure the project management of removal or improvement of barriers along the Canche and its tributaries. These new statutes allow the union to trigger several removal operations, following a list of priorities defined in the 2005. After identifying the owners and upstream/ downstream stakeholders , meetings were held with the water police and Onema to inform residents and owners on their rights and obligations. The organization of field visits identified uses, management approaches, physical condition, historical , tourism and economic value of the structures . For each of them, a comprehensive analysis allowed to define the type of measures to be implemented. | |||
So far, twenty structures without economic interest were tackled by the restoration measures. Most of them consisted in dismantling sluices. When the remaining sill was still an impassable obstacle even without the sluices, additional works, e.g. fish passes, were made. In some cases, restoration of the riverbed was carried out, particularly when the riverbed had been displaced. | |||
|Monitoring surveys and results=The actions carried out so far have increased the potential recolonization lenght by migratory fish by 2.5 km in the Course, 2.8 km in the Baillons stream, 3 km in the Créquoise and several kilometers in the Ternoise. | |||
}} | |||
{{Image gallery}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=1.conchy avant.jpg | |||
|Caption=The Canche at Conchy-sur-Canche before dismantling of the sluice. | |||
}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=2.conchy apres.jpg | |||
|Caption= The Canche at Conchy-sur-Canche after dismantling of the sluice. The banks made bare by the lowering of the water line were quickly vegetated. | |||
}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=3.22443.jpg | |||
|Caption=A weir on the Créquoise at Lebiez before restoration of the river bed. | |||
}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=4.crequoise.jpg | |||
|Caption=A weir on the Créquoise at Lebiez after restoration of the river bed. After restoration, the threshold becomes passable for trout, eels and lampreys. | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{Case study image | ||
| | |File name=8.Ternoise.jpg | ||
|Caption=The sluice of Wavrans-sur-Ternoise after works: opening valves and fish pass. | |||
| | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Image_gallery_end}} | {{Image_gallery_end}} | ||
{{Toggle button}} | {{Toggle button}} | ||
Line 107: | Line 103: | ||
1.5 | 1.5 | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{Project background | ||
|Project started=2006/01/01 | |||
|Total1 cost=265 | |||
|Funding sources=Water Agency,Department of fisheries,Syndicat mixte pour le SAGE de la Canche | |||
|Investigation and design Lead organisation=Syndicat mixte pour le SAGE de la Canche | |||
|Project started= | |Stakeholder engagement Lead organisation=Syndicat mixte pour le SAGE de la Canche | ||
|Works and supervision Lead organisation=Syndicat mixte pour le SAGE de la Canche | |||
|Post-project management and maintenance Lead organisation=Syndicat mixte pour le SAGE de la Canche | |||
|Monitoring Lead organisation=Syndicat mixte pour le SAGE de la Canche | |||
|Total1 cost= | |||
|Funding sources= | |||
|Investigation and design Lead organisation= | |||
|Stakeholder engagement Lead organisation= | |||
|Works and supervision Lead organisation= | |||
|Post-project management and maintenance Lead organisation= | |||
|Monitoring Lead organisation= | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Motivations | {{Motivations | ||
Line 194: | Line 128: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Measures | {{Measures | ||
|Bank and bed modifications measure= | |Bank and bed modifications measure=Removal of obstructions to flow | ||
|Planform / Channel pattern=Creation of fish passes, | |||
|Planform / Channel pattern= | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}} | {{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}} | ||
Line 278: | Line 198: | ||
{{Monitoring_documents}} | {{Monitoring_documents}} | ||
{{Monitoring_documents_end}} | {{Monitoring_documents_end}} | ||
{{ | {{Additional Documents}} | ||
{{Case study documents | |||
|File name=21 7 rex r1 canchebv vbat.pdf | |||
|Description=Case study description by ONEMA (French National Agency for Water and Aquatic Environments) (in French) | |||
}} | |||
{{Additional_Documents_end}} | {{Additional_Documents_end}} | ||
{{Additional_links_and_references_header}} | {{Additional_links_and_references_header}} |
Latest revision as of 09:01, 2 June 2017
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Habitat and biodiversity, Monitoring, Water quality |
Country | France |
Main contact forename | Herve |
Main contact surname | Regniez |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Syndicat mixte pour le SAGE de la Canche |
Contact organisation web site | |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
The Canche is a small 90 kilometers long river, which sources are at Gouy-en-Ternois , at an altitude of 135 m. It flows into the English Channel 20 km north of the Somme bay.
Its watershed is mainly composed of meadows and wooded areas. The majority of tributaries (Ternoise , Planquette, Créquoise Bras de Bronne, Course, Dordogne and Huitrepin) lie on its right side. These rivers offer a variety of habitats suitable for spawning and development of migratory fish. They still host salmon, sea trout, eel, river lamprey (Lampetra fluviatilis) and sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus).
The Canche has been classified as "migratory fish watercourse" since 1986 , and its tributaries have been since 1997. However, the Canche basin presents many barriers to flow and fish migration. 151 structures were identified and 77 are impassable by migratory fish. These are weirs of former flour mills, or for irrigation, or sluices. In addition to their effects on blocking fish migration, these barriers contribute to the degradation of aquatic habitats.
Streams classified by the prefect, under Article L.432 -6 of the Environmental Code, had to ensure continuity for fish within a period of five years after the publication of the decree. The departmental angling federation started in 1999 the implementation of measures to make some barriers compliant. At the end of 2002 , the “syndicat mixte pour le SAGE de la Canche" (grouping of local administrations having the responsibility to implement the Canche basin plan) to take a specific jurisdiction to ensure the project management of removal or improvement of barriers along the Canche and its tributaries. These new statutes allow the union to trigger several removal operations, following a list of priorities defined in the 2005. After identifying the owners and upstream/ downstream stakeholders , meetings were held with the water police and Onema to inform residents and owners on their rights and obligations. The organization of field visits identified uses, management approaches, physical condition, historical , tourism and economic value of the structures . For each of them, a comprehensive analysis allowed to define the type of measures to be implemented.
So far, twenty structures without economic interest were tackled by the restoration measures. Most of them consisted in dismantling sluices. When the remaining sill was still an impassable obstacle even without the sluices, additional works, e.g. fish passes, were made. In some cases, restoration of the riverbed was carried out, particularly when the riverbed had been displaced.
Monitoring surveys and results
The actions carried out so far have increased the potential recolonization lenght by migratory fish by 2.5 km in the Course, 2.8 km in the Baillons stream, 3 km in the Créquoise and several kilometers in the Ternoise.
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|