Case study:Ladywell Fields (QUERCUS): Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(32 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Case_study_status
{{Case study status
|Approval status=
|Approval status=Approved
   
 
 
   
      Draft
}}
}}
{{Location
{{Location
Line 16: Line 11:
|Status=Complete
|Status=Complete
|Project web site url=www.quercus-project.eu/
|Project web site url=www.quercus-project.eu/
|Themes=Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Monitoring, Social benefits
|Themes=Fisheries, Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Monitoring, Social benefits, Urban
|Country=England
|Country=England
|Main contact forename=Paul
|Main contact forename=Paul
|Main contact surname=Chapman
|Main contact surname=Chapman
|Contact organisation=Environment Agency
|Contact organisation=London Borough of Lewisham
|Contact organisation url=www.environment-agency.gov.uk
|Contact organisation url=www.lewisham.gov.uk/
|Partner organisations=London Borough of Lewisham, Environment Agency, Building Design Partnership, Fergal Contracting
|Partner organisations=EU's LIFE Environment Fund, London Borough of Lewisham, Environment Agency, Building Design Partnership, Fergal Contracting,
|Name of parent multi-site project=Case_study:QUERCUS Ravensbourne
|Multi-site=No
|Multi-site=No
|Project summary=Ladywell Fields has been transformed from its previously characterless and formless landscape into a diverse, popular and accessible public open space, with surveys indicating that the public’s perception of the park in terms of recreational value and safety has improved. Now 78% visitors feel safe, and use of the park has increased over 2 and a half times. The creation of a new gravel-bedded river channel through the centre of the park has also brought about significant improvements in biodiversity, with survey results indicating a near 100% increase in the number of species present in the park (in particular fishing birds), which are benefiting from the greater range of habitat types now present following the restoration works.
|Project picture=P8140069.JPG
|Picture description=Ladywell Fields after restoration
|Project summary=Ladywell Fields has been transformed from its previously characterless and formless landscape into a diverse, popular and accessible public open space. The creation of a new gravel-bedded river channel through the centre of the park has also brought about significant improvements in biodiversity. Ladywell Fields won the best-new-public-space category at London Planning Awards for its rejuvenated park in Lewisham.
 
*Aims - natural flood risk management, land use change
 
*Other aims and benefits - improving ecology, improving hydromorphological conditions
 
*Rainfall (mm) 557
 
*Altitude (m) 22
*Type - Implemented Working with Natural Processes measures 
 
*Measures Flood storage areas, Reconnect rivers to floodplain 
 
*Construction - Concrete removed, soil and stone banks instead and wooden pontoons for viewing
 
*Size (km2) 0.21
 
*Date implemented - 2007
 
*Maintenance checks - channel erosion, sedimentation in ponds, vegetation control
 
*Investment (£) 1,404,500
 
*Additional storage (m3) 15,000
 
*Elevation of defences (m) < 2
 
*Risk reduction - impacts modelled
 
|Monitoring surveys and results=*Surveys indicating that the public’s perception of the park in terms of recreational value and safety has improved. Now 78% visitors feel safe (in comparison to 44% before the restoration), and use of the park has increased over 2 and a half times.  
 
*survey results indicating a near 100% increase in the number of species present in the park (in particular fishing birds), which are benefiting from the greater range of habitat types now present following the restoration works.
|Lessons learn=Performance/Ecosystem benefits - large increase in flood water storage to maintain 1 in 100 year protection, range of environmental benefits including backwaters, riffles and pools
}}
{{Image gallery}}
{{Case study image
|File name=P8130029.JPG
|Caption=Ladywell Fields fully restored, August 2008
}}
}}
{{Case_study_subcatchment
{{Case study image
|Subcatchment=
|File name=P8140070.JPG
   
|Caption=Created backwater, August 2008
   
}}
      Ravensbourne
{{Case study image
|File name=P8140084.JPG
|Caption=Created pond, August 2008
}}
{{Image_gallery_end}}
{{Toggle button}}
{{Toggle content start}}
 
{{Case study subcatchment
|Subcatchment=Ravensbourne (Catford to Deptford)
}}
}}
{{Site
{{Site
|Name=
|Name=Ladywell fields
   
|WFD water body code=GB106039023270
   
|WFD water body name=Ravensbourne (Catford to Deptford)
      Ladywell fields
|Pre-project morphology=Single channel,Straight,Pool-riffle
|WFD water body code=
|Reference morphology=Sinuous,Pool-riffle
     
|Heavily modified water body=Yes
|WFD (national) typology=
|Protected species present=No
     
|Invasive species present=No
|WFD water body name=
|Dominant hydrology=Quick run-off
     
|Dominant substrate=Bedrock,Gravel,Silt
|Pre-project morphology=
|River corridor land use=Urban
      Single channel,Straight,Pool-riffle
|Average bankfull channel width category=2 - 5 m
|Reference morphology=
|Average bankfull channel depth category=0.5 - 2 m
      Sinuous,Pool-riffle
|Mn discharge=0.43
|Heavily modified water body=
      true
|Local site designation=
     
|Site designation=
     
|Protected species present=
     
|Invasive species present=
     
|Species=
     
|Dominant hydrology=
      Quick run-off
|Dominant substrate=
      Bedrock,Gravel,Silt
|River corridor land use=
      Urban
|Average bankfull channel width category=
      2 - 5 m
|Avrg bankfull channel width=
     
|Average bankfull channel depth category=
      0.5 - 2 m
|Avrg1 bankfull channel depth=
     
|Mean discharge category=
     
|Mn discharge=
      0.43
|Average channel gradient category=
     
|Avrg channel gradient=
     
}}
}}
{{Project_background
{{Project background
|Reach length directly affected=
|Reach length directly affected=200 m
   
|Project started=2006/06/01
   
|Works completed=2008/09/01
      200 m
|Total1 cost=500 k€
|Project started=
|Funding sources=London Borough of Lewisham, Chester City Council,
     
|Supplementary funding information=Part-funded through the EU’s LIFE Environment Programme
|Works started=
     
|Works completed=
      2008/09/01
|Project completed=
     
|Total cost category=
     
|Total1 cost=
      400 k€
|Funding sources=
      London Borough of Lewisham,Chester City Council
|Investigation and design cost category=
     
|Invst and design cost=
     
|Investigation and design Lead organisation=
     
|Investigation and design Other contact forename=
     
|Investigation and design Other contact surname=
     
|Stakeholder1 engagement cost category=
     
|stk engagement cost=
     
|Stakeholder engagement Lead organisation=
     
|Stakeholder engagement Other contact forename=
     
|Stakeholder engagement Other contact surname=
     
|Works1 and supervision cost category=
     
|Wrk and supervision cost=
     
|Works and supervision Lead organisation=
     
|Works and supervision Other contact forename=
     
|Works and supervision Other contact surname=
     
|Post-project1 management and maintenance cost category=
     
|Post-project2 management and maintenance cost=
     
|Post-project management and maintenance Lead organisation=
     
|Post-project management and maintenance Other contact forename=
     
|Post-project management and maintenance Other contact surname=
     
|Monitoring1 cost category=
     
|Monitoring2 cost=
     
|Monitoring Lead organisation=
     
|Monitoring Other contact forename=
     
|Monitoring Other contact surname=
     
|Supplementary funding information=
     
}}
}}
{{Motivations
{{Motivations
|Hydromorphological quality elements=
|Specific mitigation=Riparian development
   
|Hydromorphological quality elements=Width & depth variation,Structure & condition of riparian zones
   
|Other motivation=Habitat enhancement, crime prevention
      Width & depth variation,Structure & condition of riparian zones
|Biological quality elements=
     
|Physico-chemical quality elements=
     
|Specific mitigation=
      Riparian development
|Other motivation=
      Habitat enhancement
}}
}}
{{Measures
{{Measures
|Bank and bed modifications measure=
|Bank and bed modifications measure=Planting,Depth variation,Removal of fencing
   
|Floodplain / River corridor=Creation of backwaters,Creation of terraces,New footpaths
   
|Planform / Channel pattern=Creation of meanders
      Planting,Depth variation,Removal of fencing
|Social measures=cafe built and entrances to the park improved
|Floodplain / River corridor=
|Wider stakeholder / citizen engagement=Consultation
      Creation of backwaters,Creation of terraces,New footpaths
|Planform / Channel pattern=
      Creation of meanders
|Other technical measure=
     
|Management interventions=
     
|Social measures=
     
|Wider stakeholder / citizen engagement=
      Consultation
}}
}}
{{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}}
{{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}}
Line 225: Line 151:
}}
}}
{{End_table}}
{{End_table}}
{{Biological_quality_elements_header}}
{{Biological quality elements header}}
{{Biological quality element table row
|Element=Fish
|Monitored before=Yes
|Monitored after=Yes
|Qualitative monitoring=No
|Quantitative monitoring=No
|Control site used=No
}}
{{End_table}}
{{End_table}}
{{Physico-chemical_quality_elements_header}}
{{Physico-chemical_quality_elements_header}}
Line 257: Line 191:
{{Monitoring_documents}}
{{Monitoring_documents}}
{{Monitoring_documents_end}}
{{Monitoring_documents_end}}
{{Image gallery}}
 
{{Image_gallery_end}}
{{Additional Documents}}
{{Additional Documents}}
{{Case study documents
{{Case study documents
Line 267: Line 200:
|File name=Ladywell fields.pdf
|File name=Ladywell fields.pdf
|Description=RRC summary report
|Description=RRC summary report
}}
{{Case study documents
|File name=Ladywell Fields open house.docx
|Description=architectural information
}}
{{Case study documents
|File name=QUERCUS in Lewisham Evaluation Report.pdf
|Description=evaluation report
}}
}}
{{Case study documents
{{Case study documents
Line 275: Line 216:
{{Additional links and references header}}
{{Additional links and references header}}
{{Additional links and references
{{Additional links and references
|Link=www.therrc.co.uk/rrc_case_studies1.php?csid=55
|Link=www.therrc.co.uk/sites/default/files/projects/p1514.pdf
|Description=RRC site description
|Description=RRC site description
}}
}}
{{Additional links and references
{{Additional links and references
|Link=www.lewisham.gov.uk/inmyarea/openspaces/.../ladywell-fields.aspx
|Link=www.lewisham.gov.uk/mayorandcouncil/aboutthecouncil/eu-funding/Pages/QUERCUS.aspx
|Description=Lewisham Council's link
|Description=Lewisham Council's link
}}
{{Additional links and references
|Link=www.lewisham.gov.uk/mayorandcouncil/aboutthecouncil/eu-funding/Documents/QUERCUSProjectReportMarch2009.pdf
|Description=Quercus project final report
}}
{{Additional links and references
|Link=naturalprocesses.jbahosting.com/#12/51.4790/-0.0167
|Description=JBA case studies of natural flood risk management
}}
}}
{{Additional_links_and_references_footer}}
{{Additional_links_and_references_footer}}
{{Supplementary_Information
{{Supplementary_Information
|Information=
|Information=
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
     
}}
}}
{{Case_study_upload}}
{{Case_study_upload}}
{{Toggle content end}}

Latest revision as of 08:57, 3 April 2017

4.00
(one vote)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 51° 27' 16.31" N, 0° 1' 7.68" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site http://www.quercus-project.eu/
Themes Fisheries, Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Monitoring, Social benefits, Urban
Country England
Main contact forename Paul
Main contact surname Chapman
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation London Borough of Lewisham
Contact organisation web site http://www.lewisham.gov.uk/
Partner organisations EU's LIFE Environment Fund, London Borough of Lewisham, Environment Agency, Building Design Partnership, Fergal Contracting
Parent multi-site project

Case_study:QUERCUS Ravensbourne

This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Ladywell Fields after restoration

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


Ladywell Fields has been transformed from its previously characterless and formless landscape into a diverse, popular and accessible public open space. The creation of a new gravel-bedded river channel through the centre of the park has also brought about significant improvements in biodiversity. Ladywell Fields won the best-new-public-space category at London Planning Awards for its rejuvenated park in Lewisham.

  • Aims - natural flood risk management, land use change
  • Other aims and benefits - improving ecology, improving hydromorphological conditions
  • Rainfall (mm) 557
  • Altitude (m) 22
  • Type - Implemented Working with Natural Processes measures
  • Measures Flood storage areas, Reconnect rivers to floodplain
  • Construction - Concrete removed, soil and stone banks instead and wooden pontoons for viewing
  • Size (km2) 0.21
  • Date implemented - 2007
  • Maintenance checks - channel erosion, sedimentation in ponds, vegetation control
  • Investment (£) 1,404,500
  • Additional storage (m3) 15,000
  • Elevation of defences (m) < 2
  • Risk reduction - impacts modelled

Monitoring surveys and results

Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.


  • Surveys indicating that the public’s perception of the park in terms of recreational value and safety has improved. Now 78% visitors feel safe (in comparison to 44% before the restoration), and use of the park has increased over 2 and a half times.
  • survey results indicating a near 100% increase in the number of species present in the park (in particular fishing birds), which are benefiting from the greater range of habitat types now present following the restoration works.

Lessons learnt

Edit project overview to modify the lessons learnt.


Performance/Ecosystem benefits - large increase in flood water storage to maintain 1 in 100 year protection, range of environmental benefits including backwaters, riffles and pools


Image gallery


Ladywell Fields fully restored, August 2008
Created backwater, August 2008
Created pond, August 2008
ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district Thames
River basin London

Subcatchment

River name Ravensbourne (Catford to Deptford)
Area category 100 - 1000 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category 100 - 200 m
Maximum altitude (m) 132132 m <br />0.132 km <br />13,200 cm <br />
Dominant geology Calcareous
Ecoregion Great Britain
Dominant land cover Urban
Waterbody ID GB106039023270



Other case studies in this subcatchment: Broadway Fields/ Seagers Distillary, Catford Greyhound Stadium, Cornmill Gardens (QUERCUS), Ladywell Fields Phase 2, Ladywell Fields to Cornmill Gardens, Ladywell Fields toeboarding, Lewisham College weir, Linear Park, QUERCUS Ravensbourne, Ravensbourne Tescos... further results


Site

Name Ladywell fields
WFD water body codes GB106039023270
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name Ravensbourne (Catford to Deptford)
Pre-project morphology Single channel, Straight, Pool-riffle
Reference morphology Sinuous, Pool-riffle
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body Yes
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology Quick run-off
Dominant substrate Bedrock, Gravel, Silt
River corridor land use Urban
Average bankfull channel width category 2 - 5 m
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category 0.5 - 2 m
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s) 0.430.43 m³/s <br />430 l/s <br />
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m) 200 m0.2 km <br />20,000 cm <br />
Project started 2006/06/01
Works started
Works completed 2008/09/01
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€) 500 k€500,000 € <br />
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources London Borough of Lewisham, Chester City Council

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring

Supplementary funding information

Part-funded through the EU’s LIFE Environment Programme



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure Riparian development
Hydromorphology Width & depth variation, Structure & condition of riparian zones
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project Habitat enhancement, crime prevention


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Planting, Depth variation, Removal of fencing
Floodplain / River corridor Creation of backwaters, Creation of terraces, New footpaths
Planform / Channel pattern Creation of meanders
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement) cafe built and entrances to the park improved
Other Consultation


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Width & depth variation Yes Yes Improvement
Structure & condition of riparian zones Yes Yes Improvement

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Fish Yes Yes No No No

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Public Accessibility Yes Yes Yes Improvement


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description
http://www.therrc.co.uk/sites/default/files/projects/p1514.pdf RRC site description
http://www.lewisham.gov.uk/mayorandcouncil/aboutthecouncil/eu-funding/Pages/QUERCUS.aspx Lewisham Council's link
http://www.lewisham.gov.uk/mayorandcouncil/aboutthecouncil/eu-funding/Documents/QUERCUSProjectReportMarch2009.pdf Quercus project final report
http://naturalprocesses.jbahosting.com/#12/51.4790/-0.0167 JBA case studies of natural flood risk management

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information