Case study:River Kennet Restoration at Durnsford: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(18 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Case_study_status
{{Case study status
|Approval status=
|Approval status=Approved
   
 
 
   
      Draft
}}
}}
{{Location
{{Location
Line 17: Line 12:
|Themes=Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Monitoring
|Themes=Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Monitoring
|Country=England
|Country=England
|Main contact forename=Nick
|Main contact forename=Judy
|Main contact surname=Elbourne
|Main contact surname=England
|Main contact id=NickRRC
|Contact organisation=Environment Agency
|Contact organisation=River Restoration Centre
|Contact organisation url=www.environment-agency.gov.uk
|Contact organisation url=www.therrc.co.uk
|Partner organisations=Natural England,
|Partner organisations=Natural England,
|Multi-site=No
|Multi-site=No
|Project picture=Kennet Eddington.png
|Project picture=Kennet Eddington.png
|Picture description=Courtesy of Google Earth (2013)
|Picture description=Overwide section immediately upstream of where works were completed. Courtesy of Google Earth (2013)
|Project summary=<b>Restoration measures implemented along a 2000m section.</b>
|Project summary=Restoration measures implemented along a 2000m section included profile regrading, introduction of large woody debris, removal of invasive species, placement of gravels, cutting trees back, re-connection to adjacent floodplain, creation of wetlands and narrowing of the channel to reintroduce sinuousity.
Regrading, Introduction of LWD and CWD, Removal of invasive species, Placement of gravels, Cut back of trees, Depth variation<br>
}}
Floodplain / River corridor<br>
{{Image_gallery}}
Re-connection to adjacent floodplain, Creation of wetlands<br>
{{Image_gallery_end}}
Planform / Channel pattern<br>
{{Toggle button}}
Narrowing, Introduction of sinuousity<br>
{{Toggle content start}}


}}
{{Case study subcatchment
{{Case_study_subcatchment
|Subcatchment=Middle Kennet (Marlborough to Newbury)
|Subcatchment=
   
   
      Kennet
}}
}}
{{Site
{{Site
|Name=
|Name=Denford Common
   
|WFD water body code=GB106039023172
   
|Pre-project morphology=Straight,Embanked,High width:depth
      Denford Common
|Reference morphology=Pool-riffle,Sinuous
|WFD water body code=
|Heavily modified water body=Yes
     
|Local site designation=Area of Special Conservation Interest
|WFD (national) typology=
|Protected species present=No
     
|Invasive species present=No
|WFD water body name=
|Dominant hydrology=Quick run-off
     
|Dominant substrate=Cobble,Estuarine mud,Silt
|Pre-project morphology=
|River corridor land use=Extensive agriculture
      Straight,Embanked,High width:depth
|Average bankfull channel width category=10 - 50 m
|Reference morphology=
|Average bankfull channel depth category=5 - 10 m
      Pool-riffle,Sinuous
|Mn discharge=9.75
|Heavily modified water body=
      true
|Local site designation=
      Area of Special Conservation Interest
|Site designation=
     
|Protected species present=
     
|Invasive species present=
     
|Species=
     
|Dominant hydrology=
      Quick run-off
|Dominant substrate=
      Cobble,Estuarine mud,Silt
|River corridor land use=
      Extensive agriculture
|Average bankfull channel width category=
      10 - 50 m
|Avrg bankfull channel width=
     
|Average bankfull channel depth category=
      5 - 10 m
|Avrg1 bankfull channel depth=
     
|Mean discharge category=
     
|Mn discharge=
      9.75
|Average channel gradient category=
     
|Avrg channel gradient=
     
}}
}}
{{Project_background
{{Project_background
Line 177: Line 133:
}}
}}
{{Measures
{{Measures
|Bank and bed modifications measure=
|Bank and bed modifications measure=Regrading,Removal of invasive species,Cut back of trees,Depth variation, Introducing large woody debris, Introduction of gravel,
   
|Floodplain / River corridor=Connection to wider floodplain, Creation of wetland
   
|Planform / Channel pattern=Channel narrowing, Adding sinuosity,
      Regrading,Introduction of LWD and CWD,Removal of invasive species,Placement of gravels,Cut back of trees,Depth variation
|Management interventions=Management of organic and inorganic sediments
|Floodplain / River corridor=
|Social measures=Improved public access
      Re-connection to adjacent floodplain,Creation of wetlands
|Planform / Channel pattern=
      Narrowing,Introduction of sinuousity
|Other technical measure=
     
|Management interventions=
      Management of organic and inorganic sediments
|Social measures=
      Improved public access
|Wider stakeholder / citizen engagement=
     
}}
}}
{{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}}
{{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}}
Line 297: Line 242:
{{Monitoring_documents}}
{{Monitoring_documents}}
{{Monitoring_documents_end}}
{{Monitoring_documents_end}}
{{Image_gallery}}
 
{{Image_gallery_end}}
{{Additional_Documents}}
{{Additional_Documents}}
{{Additional_Documents_end}}
{{Additional_Documents_end}}
Line 306: Line 250:
|Information=
|Information=
      
      
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
     
}}
}}
{{Case_study_upload}}
{{Case_study_upload}}
{{Toggle content end}}

Latest revision as of 15:13, 1 June 2017

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 51° 25' 4.44" N, 1° 30' 27.86" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Monitoring
Country England
Main contact forename Judy
Main contact surname England
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Environment Agency
Contact organisation web site http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk
Partner organisations Natural England
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Overwide section immediately upstream of where works were completed. Courtesy of Google Earth (2013)

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


Restoration measures implemented along a 2000m section included profile regrading, introduction of large woody debris, removal of invasive species, placement of gravels, cutting trees back, re-connection to adjacent floodplain, creation of wetlands and narrowing of the channel to reintroduce sinuousity.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district Thames
River basin Kennet and Pang

Subcatchment

River name Middle Kennet (Marlborough to Newbury)
Area category 100 - 1000 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category 200 - 500 m
Maximum altitude (m) 264264 m <br />0.264 km <br />26,400 cm <br />
Dominant geology Calcareous
Ecoregion Great Britain
Dominant land cover Arable and Horticulture
Waterbody ID GB106039023172



Other case studies in this subcatchment: Eastridge Estate restoration project, Habitat Improvement: Stonebridge River Reserve, Og and Marlborough Fish Migration


Site

Name Denford Common
WFD water body codes GB106039023172
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology Straight, Embanked, High width:depth
Reference morphology Pool-riffle, Sinuous
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body Yes
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations Area of Special Conservation Interest
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology Quick run-off
Dominant substrate Cobble, Estuarine mud, Silt
River corridor land use Extensive agriculture
Average bankfull channel width category 10 - 50 m
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category 5 - 10 m
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s) 9.759.75 m³/s <br />9,750 l/s <br />
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m) 2000 m2 km <br />200,000 cm <br />
Project started 2009/10/01
Works started
Works completed 2010/03/01
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure Invasive species
Hydromorphology Flow velocities, Substrate conditions, Channel pattern/planform, Continuity for organisms
Biology Fish: Species composition, Fish: Abundance, Invertebrates
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project Recreation, Habitat enhancement


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Regrading, Removal of invasive species, Cut back of trees, Depth variation, Introducing large woody debris, Introduction of gravel
Floodplain / River corridor Connection to wider floodplain, Creation of wetland
Planform / Channel pattern Channel narrowing, Adding sinuosity
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions Management of organic and inorganic sediments
Social measures (incl. engagement) Improved public access
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Flow velocities Yes Yes Awaiting results
Substrate conditions Yes Yes Awaiting results

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Fish: Abundance Yes Yes Improvement
Fish: Species composition Yes Yes Improvement
Invertebrates Yes Yes Improvement

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information