Case study:Bures Mill fish by-pass: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Case study status | {{Case study status | ||
|Approval status= | |Approval status=Approved | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Location | {{Location | ||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
|Project summary=The Bures Mill fish by-pass was installed to allow fish passage upstream of the Bures Mill automatic gate on the River Stour downstream of Lamarsh | |Project summary=The Bures Mill fish by-pass was installed to allow fish passage upstream of the Bures Mill automatic gate on the River Stour downstream of Lamarsh | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Image gallery}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=27022013630.jpg | |||
|Caption=The Bures Mill Automatic Gate | |||
}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=27022013631.jpg | |||
|Caption=Looking downstream of the automatic gate | |||
}} | |||
{{Image gallery end}} | |||
{{Toggle button}} | |||
{{Toggle content start}} | |||
{{Case study subcatchment | {{Case study subcatchment | ||
|Subcatchment=Stour | |Subcatchment=Stour DS Lamarsh | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Site | {{Site | ||
Line 35: | Line 47: | ||
|River corridor land use=Intensive agriculture (arable), | |River corridor land use=Intensive agriculture (arable), | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Project background}} | {{Project background | ||
{{Motivations}} | |Works completed=2010/05/01 | ||
{{Measures}} | }} | ||
{{Motivations | |||
|Specific mitigation=Barriers to fish migration, | |||
}} | |||
{{Measures | |||
|Other technical measure=Fish by-pass channel | |||
}} | |||
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} | {{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} | ||
{{End table}} | {{End table}} | ||
Line 48: | Line 66: | ||
{{Monitoring documents}} | {{Monitoring documents}} | ||
{{Monitoring documents end}} | {{Monitoring documents end}} | ||
{{Additional Documents}} | {{Additional Documents}} | ||
{{Additional Documents end}} | {{Additional Documents end}} | ||
Line 63: | Line 71: | ||
{{Additional links and references footer}} | {{Additional links and references footer}} | ||
{{Supplementary Information}} | {{Supplementary Information}} | ||
{{Toggle content end}} |
Latest revision as of 11:27, 15 October 2013
Location: 51° 58' 1.59" N, 0° 46' 51.97" E
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Fisheries |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Darren |
Main contact surname | Tansley |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Essex Wildlife Trust |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.essexwt.org.uk/ |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
Edit project overview to modify the project summary.
The Bures Mill fish by-pass was installed to allow fish passage upstream of the Bures Mill automatic gate on the River Stour downstream of Lamarsh
Monitoring surveys and results
This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Lessons learnt
This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|