Case study:Hadfield Weir Fish Pass: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 37: Line 37:
|Biological quality elements=Fish,  
|Biological quality elements=Fish,  
}}
}}
{{Measures}}
{{Measures
|Bank and bed modifications measure=Fish pass,
}}
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}}
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}}
{{End table}}
{{End table}}

Revision as of 13:57, 27 March 2013

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

5.00
(one vote)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 53° 24' 51.85" N, 1° 24' 52.20" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Economic aspects, Fisheries, Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity
Country England
Main contact forename Karen
Main contact surname Eynon
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Don Catchment Rivers Trust
Contact organisation web site http://www.dcrt.org.uk
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

This case study hasn’t got any project summary, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Catchment and subcatchment

Select a catchment/subcatchment



Site

Edit site
Name Meadowhall
WFD water body codes GB104027057413
WFD (national) typology Mid, Medium, Calcareous
WFD water body name River Don
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body Yes
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present Yes
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use Urban, Retail
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Edit project background
Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started 2012/08/22
Works completed 2013/02/11
Project completed 2013/02/11
Total cost category 100 - 500 k€
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources DEFRA, Environment Agency

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Edit reasons for restoration
Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology Fish
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Edit Measures
Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Fish pass
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Edit Hydromorphological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Edit biological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Edit Physico-chemical
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Edit Other responses
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents

Upload monitoring documents



Image gallery



Additional documents and videos

Upload additional documents


Additional links and references

Edit links and references
Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information