Case study:River Dart (Totnes) hydropower: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 26: Line 26:
|River corridor land use=Broadleaf/mixed woodland (semi natural), Intensive agriculture (arable), Urban,  
|River corridor land use=Broadleaf/mixed woodland (semi natural), Intensive agriculture (arable), Urban,  
}}
}}
{{Project background}}
{{Project background
|Total cost category=more than 10000 k€
}}
{{Motivations
{{Motivations
|Specific mitigation=weir/hydropower  
|Specific mitigation=weir/hydropower  

Revision as of 10:47, 21 November 2012

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 50° 26' 19.90" N, 3° 41' 25.66" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Planned
Project web site
Themes Hydropower
Country England
Main contact forename Nick
Main contact surname Elbourne
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation River Restoration Centre
Contact organisation web site
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

This case study hasn’t got any project summary, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Catchment and subcatchment

Select a catchment/subcatchment


Edit the catchment and subcatchment details
(affects all case studies in this subcatchment)

Catchment

River basin district South West
River basin South Devon

Subcatchment

River name Dart
Area category 100 - 1000 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category 200 - 500 m
Maximum altitude (m) 477477 m <br />0.477 km <br />47,700 cm <br />
Dominant geology Siliceous
Ecoregion Great Britain
Dominant land cover Improved grassland
Waterbody ID GB108046008350



Site

Edit site
Name Totnes weir
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology Low gradient passively meandering, Broad and long weir
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use Broadleaf/mixed woodland (semi natural), Intensive agriculture (arable), Urban
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Edit project background
Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category more than 10000 k€
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Edit reasons for restoration
Mitigation of a pressure weir/hydropower
Hydromorphology Continuity for organisms
Biology Fish, Invertebrates
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project hydropower generation


Measures

Edit Measures
Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications existing pool-and-traverse fish pass repair/alteration and new Larinier fish pass
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement) Local college (King Edward VI) will be powered by hydropower scheme
Other Building classroom next to project site as part of KEVICC educational project


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Edit Hydromorphological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Edit biological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Edit Physico-chemical
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Edit Other responses
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents

Upload monitoring documents



Image gallery



Additional documents and videos

Upload additional documents


Additional links and references

Edit links and references
Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information