Case study:Howgill Beck Naturalisation Project: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{Case study status |Approval status=Draft }} {{Location |Location=54.9175, -2.6262 }} {{Project overview |Project title=Howgill Beck Naturalisation Project |Status=Complete |Themes=Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Peat, Water quality |Country=England |Main contact forename=Jen |Main contact surname=Selvidge |Contact organisation=RSPB |Contact organisation url=www.rspb.org.uk/ |Multi-site=No }} {{Image gallery}} {{Image gallery end}} {{Toggle button}...")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Case study status
|Approval status=Draft
}}
{{Location
|Location=54.9175, -2.6262
}}
{{Project overview
{{Project overview
|Project title=Howgill Beck Naturalisation Project
|Status=Complete
|Status=Complete
|Themes=Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Peat, Water quality
|Themes=Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Peat, Water quality
Line 15: Line 8:
|Contact organisation url=www.rspb.org.uk/
|Contact organisation url=www.rspb.org.uk/
|Multi-site=No
|Multi-site=No
|Project summary=The work along Howgill Beck extends along much of the rivers length from the headwaters through to the wide valley floor above Tindale Tarn and encompasses both instream, valley floor, valley side and tributary works to re-naturalise the system from its previously modified state. The project was completed in two stages with the ditched straightened channel close to Tindale Tarn being restored in 2022 followed by the upper catchment works in 2024 following the positive reception of the initial scheme. Works across the wide valley floor immediately above the Tarn included the rejuvenation of a previously disconnected anastomosing wetland area which is most likely its former natural state and the reprofiling of the main straight ditched channel draining into the Tarn. The anastomosing channel network interacts with several former scrapes which are now better connected and large dead wood has been used locally to improve pond habitat diversity. Works to the main channel included widenings, bifurcations, riffle reintroduction and gravel bar reinstatement to create a naturally more dynamic active sinuous channel with occasional split flows. Flow then enters a rejuvenated lake fan system which is now composed of a mosaic of distributary channels flowing between reed fen and willow/alder wet woodland. Higher in the system the watercourse steepens, and the bed coarsens, assuming a cobble/boulder character. Previously this too was rationalised into an over-deep monotonous ditched channel and the works along this reach reintroduced boulder rapids and live large wood to enhance local form and process diversity and the narrow valley floor was reconnected through widening and rejuvenation of inset berm areas. The use of live large wood is particularly innovative here, with trees being pushed into the flow to influence the hydraulics and sediment dynamics, whilst maintaining a partial rooted network that stabilises these features in this higher energy environment, allowing the tree to continue to grow in-situ. Ditched and culverted flows into the main channel were also disrupted by strategic blocking to reactivate valley fan areas recreating a multiple channel distributary network. Overall, the project has impacted 1.8 km of watercourse and wetting has extended to influence 15 ha of valley bottom seasonally and over 35 ha in flood conditions. All works were as resource neutral as possible reusing embankment river gravels to form riffle and bar units and utilising excavated scrape and pond arisings to facilitate the ditch blocking.
|Monitoring surveys and results=The minimal intervention system naturalisation approach on the upper and lower Howgill Beck, pioneered through this project, has succeeded in restoring both natural channel and valley bottom form and associated hydrological, hydraulic processes and sediment dynamics. As such the system is now completely self-sustaining, requiring no human intervention to continue to develop and diversify as a dynamic system. This dynamism has been key to the success of the project with the fluvial processes operating to progressively enhance the overall quality and functioning of the system. The proof of the project’s success is provided by the dramatic biotic response. Waders have been monitored around Lower Howgill Beck using standard Brown & Shepherd methodology, and we have recorded the highest number of Redshank since 2016 increasing 1 pair to 5 pairs in the 2024 breeding season. Two pairs of Oystercatchers have successfully bred along Howgill Beck since the completion of project works in 2022 with the last breeding attempt in this compartment being 2016. Two pairs of Common Sandpiper have nested each year since the completion of works: a first for this compartment. Flood events over Winter helped deposit finer gravels in the channels, developed the flowing wetland, and shaped shallow silty edge habitat, all essential bathing and foraging areas, especially for wading birds and chicks. The shallows of the beck and the flowing wetland are used by wading birds and their chicks including Redshank, Lapwing, Curlew, Oystercatcher and Snipe as well as Dipper and Kingfisher.
Incidental records also provide valuable data; a single walked transect (480m) through the Lower Howgill project area during a very dry spell in June 2023 recorded 31 Snipe, illustrating how resilience of the project area. Otter spraint was also recorded on one of the channels along with two Four Spotted Chasers in a newly created pool. 11 species of Odonata have also been recorded within restored project areas including the first records of Broad-bodied Chaser (1 record in 2023 and 1 record in 2024) and the first record of a Black-tailed Skimmer since 2006.
Aquatic vegetation surveys along the new water courses have taken place annually to ascertain species and relative coverage.  Current species present include various pondweeds (Potamogeton spp.), Common Water starwort (Callitriche stagnalis), Common Water-crowfoot (Ranunculus aquatilis) and Brooklime (Veronica beccabunga) with plant numbers and extent increasing significantly from the pre-restoration baseline state.
In January 2025 during an extended period of sub-zero temperatures the flowing wetlands were still functioning. The Upper Howgill Beck area held 21 Snipe in the flowing wetland and associated seepage pools along with 1 Woodcock, 6 Teal and 4 Mallard due to the suitable foraging opportunities. A further 16 were recorded in the Lower Howgill Beck project area (peak count of 55 Snipe was recorded for this compartment in October 2022). 
Nine sightings of Great White Egret have been recorded at Geltsdale within the project area: five of these were in 2024 and all but one have been since the completion of the project.
|Project title=Howgill Beck Naturalisation Project
}}
{{Case study status
|Approval status=Draft
}}
{{Location
|Location=54.9175, -2.6262
}}
}}
{{Image gallery}}
{{Image gallery}}
{{Image gallery end}}
{{Image gallery end}}

Revision as of 04:24, 14 February 2025


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Peat, Water quality
Country England
Main contact forename Jen
Main contact surname Selvidge
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation RSPB
Contact organisation web site http://www.rspb.org.uk/
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


The work along Howgill Beck extends along much of the rivers length from the headwaters through to the wide valley floor above Tindale Tarn and encompasses both instream, valley floor, valley side and tributary works to re-naturalise the system from its previously modified state. The project was completed in two stages with the ditched straightened channel close to Tindale Tarn being restored in 2022 followed by the upper catchment works in 2024 following the positive reception of the initial scheme. Works across the wide valley floor immediately above the Tarn included the rejuvenation of a previously disconnected anastomosing wetland area which is most likely its former natural state and the reprofiling of the main straight ditched channel draining into the Tarn. The anastomosing channel network interacts with several former scrapes which are now better connected and large dead wood has been used locally to improve pond habitat diversity. Works to the main channel included widenings, bifurcations, riffle reintroduction and gravel bar reinstatement to create a naturally more dynamic active sinuous channel with occasional split flows. Flow then enters a rejuvenated lake fan system which is now composed of a mosaic of distributary channels flowing between reed fen and willow/alder wet woodland. Higher in the system the watercourse steepens, and the bed coarsens, assuming a cobble/boulder character. Previously this too was rationalised into an over-deep monotonous ditched channel and the works along this reach reintroduced boulder rapids and live large wood to enhance local form and process diversity and the narrow valley floor was reconnected through widening and rejuvenation of inset berm areas. The use of live large wood is particularly innovative here, with trees being pushed into the flow to influence the hydraulics and sediment dynamics, whilst maintaining a partial rooted network that stabilises these features in this higher energy environment, allowing the tree to continue to grow in-situ. Ditched and culverted flows into the main channel were also disrupted by strategic blocking to reactivate valley fan areas recreating a multiple channel distributary network. Overall, the project has impacted 1.8 km of watercourse and wetting has extended to influence 15 ha of valley bottom seasonally and over 35 ha in flood conditions. All works were as resource neutral as possible reusing embankment river gravels to form riffle and bar units and utilising excavated scrape and pond arisings to facilitate the ditch blocking.

Monitoring surveys and results

Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.


The minimal intervention system naturalisation approach on the upper and lower Howgill Beck, pioneered through this project, has succeeded in restoring both natural channel and valley bottom form and associated hydrological, hydraulic processes and sediment dynamics. As such the system is now completely self-sustaining, requiring no human intervention to continue to develop and diversify as a dynamic system. This dynamism has been key to the success of the project with the fluvial processes operating to progressively enhance the overall quality and functioning of the system. The proof of the project’s success is provided by the dramatic biotic response. Waders have been monitored around Lower Howgill Beck using standard Brown & Shepherd methodology, and we have recorded the highest number of Redshank since 2016 increasing 1 pair to 5 pairs in the 2024 breeding season. Two pairs of Oystercatchers have successfully bred along Howgill Beck since the completion of project works in 2022 with the last breeding attempt in this compartment being 2016. Two pairs of Common Sandpiper have nested each year since the completion of works: a first for this compartment. Flood events over Winter helped deposit finer gravels in the channels, developed the flowing wetland, and shaped shallow silty edge habitat, all essential bathing and foraging areas, especially for wading birds and chicks. The shallows of the beck and the flowing wetland are used by wading birds and their chicks including Redshank, Lapwing, Curlew, Oystercatcher and Snipe as well as Dipper and Kingfisher. Incidental records also provide valuable data; a single walked transect (480m) through the Lower Howgill project area during a very dry spell in June 2023 recorded 31 Snipe, illustrating how resilience of the project area. Otter spraint was also recorded on one of the channels along with two Four Spotted Chasers in a newly created pool. 11 species of Odonata have also been recorded within restored project areas including the first records of Broad-bodied Chaser (1 record in 2023 and 1 record in 2024) and the first record of a Black-tailed Skimmer since 2006. Aquatic vegetation surveys along the new water courses have taken place annually to ascertain species and relative coverage. Current species present include various pondweeds (Potamogeton spp.), Common Water starwort (Callitriche stagnalis), Common Water-crowfoot (Ranunculus aquatilis) and Brooklime (Veronica beccabunga) with plant numbers and extent increasing significantly from the pre-restoration baseline state. In January 2025 during an extended period of sub-zero temperatures the flowing wetlands were still functioning. The Upper Howgill Beck area held 21 Snipe in the flowing wetland and associated seepage pools along with 1 Woodcock, 6 Teal and 4 Mallard due to the suitable foraging opportunities. A further 16 were recorded in the Lower Howgill Beck project area (peak count of 55 Snipe was recorded for this compartment in October 2022). Nine sightings of Great White Egret have been recorded at Geltsdale within the project area: five of these were in 2024 and all but one have been since the completion of the project.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 54° 55' 3.00" N, 2° 37' 34.32" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information