Case study:Beckenham Place Park River Restoration: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Site | |||
|Name=Beckenham Place Park | |||
|WFD water body code=GB106039023260 | |||
|WFD water body name=Ravensbourne (Keston to Catford) | |||
|Pre-project morphology=Pool-riffle, Straightened, Sinuous, Reinforced banks, Over deepened, Single channel, Over-widened, Artificial bed, Artificial channel | |||
|Heavily modified water body=Yes | |||
|Local site designation=Site of Metropolitan Importance for Nature, Local Nature Reserve | |||
|Protected species present=No | |||
|Invasive species present=Yes | |||
|Dominant hydrology=Quick run-off | |||
|Dominant substrate=Cobble, Pebble, Silt, Gravel, Sand | |||
|River corridor land use=Parklands garden, Broadleaf/mixed woodland (semi natural), Urban | |||
}} | |||
{{Case study subcatchment | {{Case study subcatchment | ||
|Subcatchment=Ravensbourne (Keston to Catford) | |Subcatchment=Ravensbourne (Keston to Catford) | ||
| Line 25: | Line 38: | ||
{{Toggle content start}} | {{Toggle content start}} | ||
{{Project background}} | {{Project background}} | ||
{{Motivations}} | {{Motivations}} | ||
Latest revision as of 16:52, 28 January 2025
Site
| Name | Beckenham Place Park |
|---|---|
| WFD water body codes | GB106039023260 |
| WFD (national) typology | |
| WFD water body name | Ravensbourne (Keston to Catford) |
| Pre-project morphology | Pool-riffle, Straightened, Sinuous, Reinforced banks, Over deepened, Single channel, Over-widened, Artificial bed, Artificial channel |
| Reference morphology | |
| Desired post project morphology | |
| Heavily modified water body | Yes |
| National/international site designation | |
| Local/regional site designations | Site of Metropolitan Importance for Nature, Local Nature Reserve |
| Protected species present | No |
| Invasive species present | Yes |
| Species of interest | |
| Dominant hydrology | Quick run-off |
| Dominant substrate | Cobble, Pebble, Silt, Gravel, Sand |
| River corridor land use | Parklands garden, Broadleaf/mixed woodland (semi natural), Urban |
| Average bankfull channel width category | |
| Average bankfull channel width (m) | |
| Average bankfull channel depth category | |
| Average bankfull channel depth (m) | |
| Mean discharge category | |
| Mean annual discharge (m3/s) | |
| Average channel gradient category | |
| Average channel gradient | |
| Average unit stream power (W/m2) |
Catchment and subcatchment
Select a catchment/subcatchment
Edit the catchment and subcatchment details
(affects all case studies in this subcatchment)
Catchment
| River basin district | Thames |
|---|---|
| River basin | London |
Subcatchment
| River name | Ravensbourne (Keston to Catford) |
|---|---|
| Area category | 10 - 100 km² |
| Area (km2) | |
| Maximum altitude category | 200 - 500 m |
| Maximum altitude (m) | 274274 m <br />0.274 km <br />27,400 cm <br /> |
| Dominant geology | Calcareous |
| Ecoregion | Great Britain |
| Dominant land cover | Suburban |
| Waterbody ID | GB106039023260 |
Other case studies in this subcatchment: Downham Playing Fields, Fordmill weir, Norman Park Bromley., Ravensbourne at Queensmead
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Location: 51° 25' 23.81" N, 0° 0' 52.99" W
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.
Project overview
| Status | Complete |
|---|---|
| Project web site | |
| Themes | Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Social benefits, Urban |
| Country | England |
| Main contact forename | Tyler |
| Main contact surname | Randall |
| Main contact user ID | User:TylerThames21 |
| Contact organisation | Thames21 |
| Contact organisation web site | http://www.Thames21.org.uk |
| Partner organisations | |
| Parent multi-site project | |
| This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.
Project summary
This case study hasn’t got any project summary, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Monitoring surveys and results
This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Lessons learnt
This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Image gallery
|
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
