Case study:Bowston Weir Removal: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 146: | Line 146: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Other response table row | {{Other response table row | ||
|Monitored before= | |Element=general assessment of habitat quality and diversity (repeat photography) | ||
|Monitored before=Yes | |||
|Monitored after=No | |Monitored after=No | ||
|Qualitative monitoring=No | |Qualitative monitoring=No | ||
|Quantitative monitoring=No | |Quantitative monitoring=No | ||
|Control site used=No | |Control site used=No | ||
|Result=Awaiting results | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{End table}} | {{End table}} |
Revision as of 14:59, 20 February 2023
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Project overview
Status | In progress |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Social benefits |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Peter |
Main contact surname | Evoy |
Main contact user ID | User:South Cumbria Rivers Trust |
Contact organisation | South Cumbria Rivers Trust |
Contact organisation web site | http://scrt.co.uk |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
Bowston weir is the first weir to be removed on the River Kent Site of Special Scientific Interest and Special Area of Conservation (SSSI/SAC). Bowston weir removal forms part of the Cumbria River Restoration Strategy (CRRS) which aims to restore the three Cumbrian SSSI/SAC rivers to their natural form and function and help them achieve Favourable Condition.
Monitoring surveys and results
1. Baseline data includes fish surveys and other ecological parameters, topographical and bathymetrical surveys, drone surveys and walk over fluvial audits.
2. Post-removal data collection continued immediately after the weir removal to track the immediate change in river processes and hydrological conditions.
3. Continued collection and analysis following geomorphologically effective flow events has provided valuable monitoring data to identify positive changes in the river dynamics, improved sediment flux through the system, enhancement to the now varied ecosystem.
Lessons learnt
SCRT created a Local Community Engagement Plan with local representatives which explained how, what and when we would communicate with local stakeholders and the public. This was extremely effective in setting out our engagement responsibilities and ensured a standardised approached to our communications.
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Other case studies in this subcatchment: Lake District Foundation - Building future environmental investment
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|