Case study:The Lowther catchment water vole project: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(XML import)
 
No edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:
       54.582527,-2.7477668
       54.582527,-2.7477668
}}
}}
{{Project_overview
{{Project overview
|Status=
|Status=Complete
   
|Project web site url=www.edenriverstrust.org.uk/readying-the-return-of-ratty-back-to-edens-riverbanks/
   
|Themes=Habitat and biodiversity
      Complete
|Country=England
|Project web site url=
|Main contact forename=Environment
     
|Main contact surname=Agency
|Themes=
|Contact organisation=Environment Agency
     
|Partner organisations=Eden Rivers Trust,
|Country=
|Multi-site=No
      England
|Project summary=Water voles were once widespread in Cumbria but are now almost absent from the county except for isolated populations in the eastern part of the Eden catchment. The holes that would have once been their burrows are still visible on some of our riverbanks. But we rarely see a water vole in them now.
|Main contact forename=
 
      Environment
To secure the future of this native species, river conservation charity, the Eden Rivers Trust has recently launched an £80k partnership project funded by the Environment Agency and The Hadfield Trust that will hopefully see this much-loved small mammal return to Cumbrian rivers in the future.
|Main contact surname=
 
      Agency
We are joining forces with the RSPB, Lowther Estates, United Utilities, Cumbria Wildlife Trust, Penrith Anglers and local farmers through our Lowther and Leith Facilitation Fund farmer group to put in place long-term, ongoing control of American mink (the invasive species that preys on water voles) and create the ideal habitat into which captive-bred water voles can be released, hopefully from 2023 onwards.
|Main contact id=
     
|Contact organisation=
      Environment Agency
|Contact organisation url=
     
|Partner organisations=
     
|Multi-site=
     
|Name of parent multi-site project=
     
|Project picture=
     
|Picture description=
     
|Project summary=
     
}}
}}
{{Image_gallery}}
{{Image_gallery}}

Revision as of 12:41, 2 August 2022

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 54° 34' 57.10" N, 2° 44' 51.96" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site http://www.edenriverstrust.org.uk/readying-the-return-of-ratty-back-to-edens-riverbanks/
Themes Habitat and biodiversity
Country England
Main contact forename Environment
Main contact surname Agency
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Environment Agency
Contact organisation web site
Partner organisations Eden Rivers Trust
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


Water voles were once widespread in Cumbria but are now almost absent from the county except for isolated populations in the eastern part of the Eden catchment. The holes that would have once been their burrows are still visible on some of our riverbanks. But we rarely see a water vole in them now.

To secure the future of this native species, river conservation charity, the Eden Rivers Trust has recently launched an £80k partnership project funded by the Environment Agency and The Hadfield Trust that will hopefully see this much-loved small mammal return to Cumbrian rivers in the future.

We are joining forces with the RSPB, Lowther Estates, United Utilities, Cumbria Wildlife Trust, Penrith Anglers and local farmers through our Lowther and Leith Facilitation Fund farmer group to put in place long-term, ongoing control of American mink (the invasive species that preys on water voles) and create the ideal habitat into which captive-bred water voles can be released, hopefully from 2023 onwards.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district Eden and Esk
River basin

Subcatchment

River name River Eden
Area category
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category
Maximum altitude (m)
Dominant geology
Ecoregion
Dominant land cover
Waterbody ID



Other case studies in this subcatchment: Eden crayfish eDNA project, Farming with water - Ullswater Catchment, Pow Beck Water Quality Improvement Programme, Scales Farm


Site

Name
WFD water body codes GB102076071010
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information