Case study:Reopening of Mjølløst stream: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(12 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
|Main contact surname=Segarra Valls | |Main contact surname=Segarra Valls | ||
|Contact organisation=Vannområde Horten-Larvik | |Contact organisation=Vannområde Horten-Larvik | ||
|Contact organisation url= | |Contact organisation url=www.vannportalen.no/vannregioner/vestfold-og-telemark/vannomrader/horten---larvik/ | ||
|Partner organisations=Sandefjord kommune, Sandefjord Forvaltningsråd for Anadrom Laksefisk | |Partner organisations=Sandefjord kommune, Sandefjord Forvaltningsråd for Anadrom Laksefisk | ||
|Multi-site=No | |Multi-site=No | ||
|Project picture=Mjollostbekken 1959-79 (venstre) 2017 (hoyre).jpg | |Project picture=Mjollostbekken 1959-79 (venstre) 2017 (hoyre).jpg | ||
|Project summary=Mjølløst stream is part of a 17 km long stream system. | |Project summary=Mjølløst stream is part of a 17 km long stream system. | ||
Mjølløst stream has since the 1960s had a 270 meter long stream closure that prevents sea trout from accessing a 1.4 km stream stretch. The concrete pipe is getting closer to the end of its lifetime, | Mjølløst stream has since the 1960s had a 270 meter long stream closure that prevents sea trout from accessing a 1.4 km stream stretch. The concrete pipe is getting closer to the end of its lifetime and might collapse in the next years if nothing is done. Landowner, local and regional authorities are positive to remove the culvert and restore the original stream. This project got funding from Norwegian Environment Agency (Miljødirektoratet) in 2020 and we intend to implement it in 2021, if it is technically possible (see "Lessons learnt"). | ||
|Monitoring surveys and results=Results electrofishing October 2020 (before reopening of the stream): | |Monitoring surveys and results=Results electrofishing October 2020 (before reopening of the stream): | ||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
Station 3 (200 m ustreams closuse): 57 trout / 100m2. | Station 3 (200 m ustreams closuse): 57 trout / 100m2. | ||
Fish from upstream stations is | Fish from upstream stations (2 and 3) is stationary trout introduced by local people from other locations. | ||
|Lessons learn=1. Because of its proximity to the railway (< 30 m) it is required an approval from the railway authorities (Bane-Nor) in order to be able to daylight / deculvert the stream. | |Lessons learn=1. Because of its proximity to the railway (< 30 m) it is required an approval from the railway authorities (Bane-Nor) in order to be able to daylight / deculvert the stream. | ||
2. There can be quick clay (kvikkleire) according to NVE (Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate). This makes necessary to explore the ground stability before digging the pipe out of the ground. This will increase considerably the costs of the project. | 2. There can be quick clay (kvikkleire) in the area of restoration according to NVE (Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate). This makes necessary to explore the ground stability before digging the pipe out of the ground. This will increase considerably the costs of the project. | ||
|Project title=Reopening of Mjølløst stream | |Project title=Reopening of Mjølløst stream | ||
}} | }} | ||
Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
|Reach length directly affected=270 | |Reach length directly affected=270 | ||
|Project started=2020/03/01 | |Project started=2020/03/01 | ||
|Total1 cost=100 | |||
|Funding sources=The Norwegian Environmental Agency (Miljødirektoratet), | |Funding sources=The Norwegian Environmental Agency (Miljødirektoratet), | ||
|Invst and design cost=20 | |||
|Wrk and supervision cost=70 | |||
|Post-project2 management and maintenance cost=5 | |||
|Monitoring2 cost=5 | |||
|Supplementary funding information=Preliminary estimates. | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Motivations | {{Motivations | ||
Line 89: | Line 95: | ||
{{Monitoring documents end}} | {{Monitoring documents end}} | ||
{{Additional Documents}} | {{Additional Documents}} | ||
{{Case study documents | |||
|File name=Project deculverting Mjollost stream.pdf | |||
|Description=Description of the culverted stream, and initial technical proposal for deculverting (in Norwegian) | |||
}} | |||
{{Case study documents | |||
|File name=GJEaaPNING AV MJoLoSTBEKKEN - kommentarer NLR.pdf | |||
|Description=Kommentarer fra NLR | |||
}} | |||
{{Additional Documents end}} | {{Additional Documents end}} | ||
{{Additional links and references header}} | {{Additional links and references header}} |
Latest revision as of 10:39, 16 February 2021
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Project overview
Status | Planned |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Habitat and biodiversity, Land use management - agriculture, Monitoring |
Country | Norway |
Main contact forename | Miguel A. |
Main contact surname | Segarra Valls |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Vannområde Horten-Larvik |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.vannportalen.no/vannregioner/vestfold-og-telemark/vannomrader/horten---larvik/ |
Partner organisations | Sandefjord kommune, Sandefjord Forvaltningsråd for Anadrom Laksefisk |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
Mjølløst stream is part of a 17 km long stream system.
Mjølløst stream has since the 1960s had a 270 meter long stream closure that prevents sea trout from accessing a 1.4 km stream stretch. The concrete pipe is getting closer to the end of its lifetime and might collapse in the next years if nothing is done. Landowner, local and regional authorities are positive to remove the culvert and restore the original stream. This project got funding from Norwegian Environment Agency (Miljødirektoratet) in 2020 and we intend to implement it in 2021, if it is technically possible (see "Lessons learnt").
Monitoring surveys and results
Results electrofishing October 2020 (before reopening of the stream):
Station 1 (downstreams closure): 141 trout / 100 m2. Station 2 (upstreams closure): 1 trout / 100m2. Station 3 (200 m ustreams closuse): 57 trout / 100m2.
Fish from upstream stations (2 and 3) is stationary trout introduced by local people from other locations.
Lessons learnt
1. Because of its proximity to the railway (< 30 m) it is required an approval from the railway authorities (Bane-Nor) in order to be able to daylight / deculvert the stream.
2. There can be quick clay (kvikkleire) in the area of restoration according to NVE (Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate). This makes necessary to explore the ground stability before digging the pipe out of the ground. This will increase considerably the costs of the project.
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchment
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Supplementary funding informationPreliminary estimates.
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|