Case study:Deculverting Djupsund stream: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(13 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Image gallery}} | {{Image gallery}} | ||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=Djupsund stram after daylighting 2.jpg | |||
|Caption=Djupsund stream after deculvering. Picture: Miguel A. Segarra Valls | |||
}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=Djupsund stram after daylighting 1.jpg | |||
|Caption=Djupsund stream after deculvering. Picture: Miguel A. Segarra Valls | |||
}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=New pipe under way that crosses Djupsund stream.jpg | |||
|Caption=New pipe under way that crosses Djupsund stream. Picture by Miguel A. Segarra Valls | |||
}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=Sea tout at the opening of the old culvert in Djupsund stream.jpg | |||
|Caption=Sea tout at the opening of the old culvert in Djupsund stream (before restauration).Picture by Miguel A. Segarra Valls | |||
}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=Description restauration project in Djupsund Stream.png | |||
|Caption=Description restauration project in Djupsund Stream. Record: Norconsult | |||
}} | |||
{{Image gallery end}} | {{Image gallery end}} | ||
{{Toggle button}} | {{Toggle button}} | ||
{{Toggle content start}} | {{Toggle content start}} | ||
{{Case study subcatchment}} | {{Case study subcatchment}} | ||
{{Site}} | {{Site | ||
{{Project background}} | |Name=Djupsundbekken | ||
{{Motivations}} | |WFD water body code=EU-ID:NO015-1467-R | ||
{{Measures}} | |WFD (national) typology=R110 | ||
|WFD water body name=Djupsundbekken | |||
|Heavily modified water body=No | |||
|Protected species present=No | |||
|Invasive species present=No | |||
}} | |||
{{Project background | |||
|Project started=2020/01/15 | |||
|Works started=2021/02/15 | |||
|Funding sources=Miljødirektoratet | |||
|Invst and design cost=1.2 | |||
|Wrk and supervision cost=9 | |||
|Post-project2 management and maintenance cost=3 | |||
|Monitoring2 cost=5 | |||
}} | |||
{{Motivations | |||
|Hydromorphological quality elements=Continuity for organisms, | |||
|Biological quality elements=Fish, | |||
}} | |||
{{Measures | |||
|Bank and bed modifications measure=Re-introducing spawning gravel, | |||
|Floodplain / River corridor=Bigger diameter pipe under way | |||
|Other technical measure=Deculverting, | |||
}} | |||
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} | {{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} | ||
{{End table}} | {{End table}} | ||
Line 43: | Line 86: | ||
{{Monitoring documents end}} | {{Monitoring documents end}} | ||
{{Additional Documents}} | {{Additional Documents}} | ||
{{Case study documents | |||
|File name=Not Djupsundbekken gjennapning J02.pdf | |||
|Description=Description of the culverted stream, and initial technical proposals for deculverting (in Norwegian) | |||
}} | |||
{{Case study documents | |||
|File name=SFFAL rapport dugnadsarbeid Djupsund.pdf | |||
}} | |||
{{Additional Documents end}} | {{Additional Documents end}} | ||
{{Additional links and references header}} | {{Additional links and references header}} |
Latest revision as of 09:22, 16 February 2021
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Project overview
Status | In progress |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Habitat and biodiversity, Social benefits, Spatial planning |
Country | Norway |
Main contact forename | Miguel Angel |
Main contact surname | Segarra Valls |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Vannområde Horten-Larvik |
Contact organisation web site | http://https://www.vannportalen.no/vannregioner/vestfold-og-telemark/vannomrader/horten---larvik/ |
Partner organisations | Sandefjord Forvaltningsråd for Anadrom Laksefisk |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
The Djupsund stream is a very small but very important stram for sea trout in the fjord Mefjorden (Sandefjord municipality), and it has been described as "a small sea trout machine". The upper part of the stream was culverted with pipes that were too small, and this caused problems for crossing way when strong rainfall episodes occurred. Around 80 m of the stream were daylighted, and a new 1 m diameter pipe was installed under the way in December 2020. Gravel was used to cover parts of daylighted stream and the bottom of the pipe under the crossing way.
We intend to restore the riparian vegetation along the daylighted stream during spring 2021, in cooperation with pupils from a nearby school.
Monitoring surveys and results
The recolonization of the new stream stretch by sea trout will be monitored from 2021.
Lessons learnt
New research shows that the ideal amount of spawning gravel in a stream is 20 % of the habitat (https://lakseelver.no/nb/news-2019/utlegg-av-gytegrus). We covered much more of the reopened stream, and will consider to take measures in order to increase the habitat variation.
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchment
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videosDescription of the culverted stream, and initial technical proposals for deculverting (in Norwegian)
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|