Case study:Tanners Brook: Difference between revisions
Hazel Wilson (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Project overview | {{Project overview | ||
|Status=Complete | |Status=Complete | ||
|Project web site url=www.ecrr.org/Portals/27/Tanners%20Brook,%20Southampton.pdf | |||
|Themes=Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Social benefits | |Themes=Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Social benefits | ||
|Country=England | |Country=England | ||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
|Main contact surname=Peacock | |Main contact surname=Peacock | ||
|Contact organisation=Environment Agency | |Contact organisation=Environment Agency | ||
|Partner organisations=Southampton Council, Arup, Southampton Golf Club | |||
|Multi-site=No | |Multi-site=No | ||
|Project summary=Holly Brook is a tributary of Tanner’s Brook, a heavily urbanised watercourse which flows through Millbrook and into Southampton Water. Both watercourses are heavily modified in their lower reaches due to urban development | |||
and are subject to fluvial flooding at various locations. The Holly Brook channel has been straightened and culverted in some sections. Flow in the Holly Brook is predominantly uniform glides with a meandering planform and localised riffles and pools – overall it has limited geomorphological diversity. Further downstream it is constrained by urban development. In Southampton Golf Club the channel had been culverted, resulting in poor drainage. The 27 hole golf course is characterised by a highly managed undulating landscape with frequent copses of mature trees throughout the course. Holly Brook is currently culverted through the middle of the course, with the exception of a short stretch through a large woodland copse in the very centre of the course (designated as a Site of Importance for Nature Conservation). To the north of the golf course, the brook flows naturally through a mature woodland copse. To the south, the brook is culverted underneath Southampton Sports Centre. | |||
|Project title=Tanners Brook | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Image gallery}} | {{Image gallery}} |
Revision as of 13:18, 3 January 2019
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | http://www.ecrr.org/Portals/27/Tanners%20Brook,%20Southampton.pdf |
Themes | Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Social benefits |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Josh |
Main contact surname | Peacock |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Environment Agency |
Contact organisation web site | |
Partner organisations | Southampton Council, Arup, Southampton Golf Club |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
Holly Brook is a tributary of Tanner’s Brook, a heavily urbanised watercourse which flows through Millbrook and into Southampton Water. Both watercourses are heavily modified in their lower reaches due to urban development
and are subject to fluvial flooding at various locations. The Holly Brook channel has been straightened and culverted in some sections. Flow in the Holly Brook is predominantly uniform glides with a meandering planform and localised riffles and pools – overall it has limited geomorphological diversity. Further downstream it is constrained by urban development. In Southampton Golf Club the channel had been culverted, resulting in poor drainage. The 27 hole golf course is characterised by a highly managed undulating landscape with frequent copses of mature trees throughout the course. Holly Brook is currently culverted through the middle of the course, with the exception of a short stretch through a large woodland copse in the very centre of the course (designated as a Site of Importance for Nature Conservation). To the north of the golf course, the brook flows naturally through a mature woodland copse. To the south, the brook is culverted underneath Southampton Sports Centre.
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|