Case study:Beverley Park: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 115: | Line 115: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Measures | {{Measures | ||
|Bank and bed modifications measure=Bank | |Bank and bed modifications measure=Bank reprofiling, | ||
|Floodplain / River corridor=Habitat creation, Cut back of trees, Creation of wetland, Floodplain reconnection, Restoring riparian vegetation, | |Floodplain / River corridor=Habitat creation, Cut back of trees, Creation of wetland, Floodplain reconnection, Restoring riparian vegetation, | ||
|Planform / Channel pattern=Channel realignment, | |Planform / Channel pattern=Channel realignment, | ||
|Social measures= | |Social measures=Public amenity and perception, Improved public access, Community Education, | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}} | {{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}} |
Latest revision as of 16:00, 2 January 2019
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Project overview
Status | Planned |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Social benefits, Water quality, Urban |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Joanna |
Main contact surname | Heisse |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Environment Agency |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/environment-agency |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
Potential for realignment/restoration/enhancement works to the river and floodplain. Potential for establishment of the marginal/bankside habitat by reducing shading from excessive tree cover and regrading the banks and removing the fencing along the river. This would improve the ecological value of river and river corridor, visibility of the river and access to the river. There is also the potential for wetland creation with the park, and habitat for bats in the culvert to the north of the park. Reconnect river to it’s floodplain; improve water quality by introducing riparian vegetation and establishing currently nonexistent bankside and emergent habitats; provide access to nature and improve amenity value of the park.
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Other case studies in this subcatchment: Anton Crescent Wetlands Regeneration, Ashlone Wharf FCRM scheme, Barn Elms Sports Ground, Barn Elms Wetland Centre, South West London, Barnes Common, Barnes Common improvements, Beverley Brook Flow control structures, Beverley Brook d/s of Rock’s Lane, Cuddington Park, Horne Way Weir... further results
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|