Case study:Trawden Natural Flood Management Scoping Study: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{Case study status |Approval status=Draft }} {{Location |Location=53.84841789999999, -2.13682730000005 }} {{Project overview |Project title=Trawden Natural Flood Management S...")
 
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
}}
}}
{{Project overview
{{Project overview
|Project title=Trawden Natural Flood Management Scoping Study
|Status=Planned
|Status=Planned
|Project web site url=www.therrc.co.uk/sites/default/files/projects/45_trawden.pdf
|Themes=Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Land use management - agriculture, Land use management - forestry, Social benefits, Water quality
|Themes=Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Land use management - agriculture, Land use management - forestry, Social benefits, Water quality
|Country=England
|Country=England
Line 14: Line 14:
|Contact organisation=Environment Agency
|Contact organisation=Environment Agency
|Contact organisation url=www.gov.uk/government/organisations/environment-agency
|Contact organisation url=www.gov.uk/government/organisations/environment-agency
|Partner organisations=Moors for the Future, Ribble Rivers Trust, Edenvale Young Associates, AECOM,
|Multi-site=No
|Multi-site=No
|Project picture=45 Trawden.png
|Project summary=The project will scope out and model NFM interventions that could establish a reduction in flood risk to Trawden, a village at risk of flooding, near Colne in the Ribble catchment in Lancashire (Map 1). The aim is to inform the Trawden Capital Project and identify catchment scale interventions which could add climate change resilience to this scheme.  This will be achieved through: 
• Hydraulic modelling: updating the current flood model to establish potential for Natural Flood Management (NFM). This will done by: carrying out a review of the hydraulic and hydrological modifications that could be made within the modelling to represent the effects of NFM; establishing the reduction in peak flows that may be afforded by NFM, or failing that the climate change resilience that may be offered.
• NFM aspirational scoping: carrying out a geomorphology baseline assessment and a landscape scale assessment of the evidence-based NFM solutions that are possible within the catchment surrounding Trawden, including the modelling of each intervention.
• NFM prioritisation: identifying opportunities and methods for priority areas for delivery including social, economic and environmental multiple benefits, match funding and current constraints.
The results of the scoping study are due for publication in June 2017. The key findings will be whether it is possible to reduce flood risk to Trawden through NFM alone, in combination with a proposed traditional capital scheme, or to add climate change resilience to a traditional capital scheme. To date a landscape scale and geomorphological assessment of the Trawden catchment has identified over 150 potential NFM interventions.
|Project title=Trawden Natural Flood Management Scoping Study
}}
}}
{{Image gallery}}
{{Image gallery}}

Revision as of 13:41, 8 November 2018

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 53° 50' 54.30" N, 2° 8' 12.58" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Planned
Project web site http://www.therrc.co.uk/sites/default/files/projects/45_trawden.pdf
Themes Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Land use management - agriculture, Land use management - forestry, Social benefits, Water quality
Country England
Main contact forename Alison
Main contact surname Whalley
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Environment Agency
Contact organisation web site http://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/environment-agency
Partner organisations Moors for the Future, Ribble Rivers Trust, Edenvale Young Associates, AECOM
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Project picture

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


The project will scope out and model NFM interventions that could establish a reduction in flood risk to Trawden, a village at risk of flooding, near Colne in the Ribble catchment in Lancashire (Map 1). The aim is to inform the Trawden Capital Project and identify catchment scale interventions which could add climate change resilience to this scheme. This will be achieved through: • Hydraulic modelling: updating the current flood model to establish potential for Natural Flood Management (NFM). This will done by: carrying out a review of the hydraulic and hydrological modifications that could be made within the modelling to represent the effects of NFM; establishing the reduction in peak flows that may be afforded by NFM, or failing that the climate change resilience that may be offered. • NFM aspirational scoping: carrying out a geomorphology baseline assessment and a landscape scale assessment of the evidence-based NFM solutions that are possible within the catchment surrounding Trawden, including the modelling of each intervention. • NFM prioritisation: identifying opportunities and methods for priority areas for delivery including social, economic and environmental multiple benefits, match funding and current constraints. The results of the scoping study are due for publication in June 2017. The key findings will be whether it is possible to reduce flood risk to Trawden through NFM alone, in combination with a proposed traditional capital scheme, or to add climate change resilience to a traditional capital scheme. To date a landscape scale and geomorphological assessment of the Trawden catchment has identified over 150 potential NFM interventions.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information