Case study:Stony Stratford Sluices Bypass Channel: Difference between revisions
Robclapham (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Case study status | {{Case study status | ||
|Approval status= | |Approval status=Approved | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Location | {{Location | ||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
{{Site | {{Site | ||
|Name=Stony Stratford | |Name=Stony Stratford | ||
|WFD water body code=GB105033037920, | |WFD water body code=GB105033037920, | ||
|WFD water body name=Ouse (Buckingham to Cosgrove) | |WFD water body name=Ouse (Buckingham to Cosgrove) | ||
|Pre-project morphology= | |Pre-project morphology=Sinuous, | ||
|Desired post project morphology=Sinuous | |Desired post project morphology=Sinuous, | ||
|Heavily modified water body=Yes | |Heavily modified water body=Yes | ||
|Protected species present=No | |Protected species present=No | ||
|Invasive species present=Yes | |Invasive species present=Yes | ||
|Dominant substrate=Clay | |Dominant substrate=Clay | ||
|River corridor land use=Improved/semi-improved grassland/pasture, | |River corridor land use=Improved/semi-improved grassland/pasture, | ||
|Average bankfull channel width category=2 - 5 m | |Average bankfull channel width category=2 - 5 m | ||
|Average bankfull channel depth category=0.5 - 2 m | |Average bankfull channel depth category=0.5 - 2 m | ||
Line 65: | Line 65: | ||
|Project completed=2016/03/31 | |Project completed=2016/03/31 | ||
|Total cost category=50 - 100 k€ | |Total cost category=50 - 100 k€ | ||
|Funding sources= | |Funding sources=FCRM GiA, Milton Keynes Parks Trust, Environment Agency Grant in Aid, | ||
|Investigation and design cost category=1 - 10 k€ | |Investigation and design cost category=1 - 10 k€ | ||
|Investigation and design Lead organisation=Fishtek Consulting | |Investigation and design Lead organisation=Fishtek Consulting | ||
Line 83: | Line 83: | ||
|Monitoring Other contact surname=Clapham | |Monitoring Other contact surname=Clapham | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Motivations}} | {{Motivations | ||
{{Measures}} | |Specific mitigation=Impoundments (not hydropower), | ||
|Hydromorphological quality elements=substrate conditions, Continuity for organisms, Quantity & dynamics of flow, | |||
|Biological quality elements=Fish, | |||
}} | |||
{{Measures | |||
|Planform / Channel pattern=Creation of fish passes, | |||
|Social measures=Partnerships, | |||
}} | |||
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} | {{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} | ||
{{End table}} | {{End table}} |
Latest revision as of 13:46, 1 November 2018
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Rob |
Main contact surname | Clapham |
Main contact user ID | User:Robclapham |
Contact organisation | Environment Agency |
Contact organisation web site | |
Partner organisations | Milton Keynes Park's Trust |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
The Great Ouse between Milton Keynes and Buckingham is a section of river that has historically suffered deterioration in, part due to the number of man-made structures on the watercourse. Following floods, these large structures prevent re-colonization of displaced fish and impound the river, reducing flows and sediment movement, with impacts on habitat quality and diversity.
To mitigate these pressures, a partnership project was formed by the Environment Agency and Milton Keynes Parks Trust. The works installed a fish friendly flow control structure at the upstream end of a previously disconnected paleo-channel allowing water to flow through it and around Stony Stratford Sluices which are currently impassable to fish.
Monitoring surveys and results
Electric Fishing surveys to be carried out in the first summer following completion.
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchment
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|