Case study:Ouzel habitat improvement: Difference between revisions
Robclapham (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(13 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Case study status | {{Case study status | ||
|Approval status= | |Approval status=Approved | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Location | {{Location | ||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
|Contact organisation=Environment Agency | |Contact organisation=Environment Agency | ||
|Multi-site=No | |Multi-site=No | ||
|Project picture=IMG 4629.JPG | |||
|Picture description=upstream deflector | |||
|Project summary=Section of the Ouzel in Milton Keynes. The river has modified in the past, for example, channelization works have created a more uniform channel cutting off meanders and reducing hydromorphological diversity in flow and channel bed forms. | |Project summary=Section of the Ouzel in Milton Keynes. The river has modified in the past, for example, channelization works have created a more uniform channel cutting off meanders and reducing hydromorphological diversity in flow and channel bed forms. | ||
Works over an 80m section included 3 single and 1 paired deflector. The aim of these works was to increase diversity of flows and bed profile over this section. It is anticipated that over time, underlying gravels, currently overlaid by fine sediment will be kicked up by localised scour (from deflectors) and also improve habitat quality for invertebrates and for fish spawning. | Works over an 80m section included 3 single and 1 paired deflector. The aim of these works was to increase diversity of flows and bed profile over this section. It is anticipated that over time, underlying gravels, currently overlaid by fine sediment will be kicked up by localised scour (from deflectors) and also improve habitat quality for invertebrates and for fish spawning. | ||
|Monitoring surveys and results=*Pre-enhancement fish survey undertaken. | |||
|Monitoring surveys and results=Pre-enhancement fish survey undertaken. Post-enhancement surveys planned. | *Post-enhancement surveys planned. | ||
*River habitat assessment survey (Central Habitat Assessment) | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Image gallery}} | {{Image gallery}} | ||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=IMG 4629.JPG | |||
|Caption=Upstream deflector installation | |||
}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=IMG 4641.JPG | |||
|Caption=Downstream paired deflectors | |||
}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=IMG 4637.JPG | |||
|Caption=Downstream single deflector | |||
}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=Ouzel OU plan.pdf | |||
}} | |||
{{Image gallery end}} | {{Image gallery end}} | ||
{{Toggle button}} | {{Toggle button}} | ||
{{Toggle content start}} | {{Toggle content start}} | ||
{{Case study subcatchment}} | {{Case study subcatchment | ||
{{Site}} | |Subcatchment=Ouzel US Caldecote Mill | ||
{{Project background}} | }} | ||
{{Site | |||
|Name=River Ouzel (Open University) | |||
|WFD water body code=GB105033037971 | |||
|WFD (national) typology=Low, Medium, Calcareous | |||
|WFD water body name=Ouzel US Caldecote Mill | |||
|Heavily modified water body=Yes | |||
|Protected species present=No | |||
|Invasive species present=Yes | |||
|River corridor land use=Recreational grassland / grazed | |||
|Average bankfull channel width category=5 - 10 m | |||
|Average bankfull channel depth category=0.5 - 2 m | |||
}} | |||
{{Project background | |||
|Reach length directly affected=80 | |||
|Project started=2014/08/10 | |||
|Works started=2014/09/10 | |||
|Works completed=2014/09/10 | |||
|Project completed=2014/09/10 | |||
|Total cost category=Less than 1 k€ | |||
|Funding sources=Environment Agency Grant in Aid, | |||
|Investigation and design Lead organisation=Environment Agency | |||
|Investigation and design Other contact forename=Rob | |||
|Investigation and design Other contact surname=Clapham | |||
|Works1 and supervision cost category=Less than 1 k€ | |||
|Works and supervision Lead organisation=Environment Agency | |||
|Works and supervision Other contact forename=Rob | |||
|Works and supervision Other contact surname=Clapham | |||
|Post-project1 management and maintenance cost category=Less than 1 k€ | |||
|Post-project management and maintenance Lead organisation=Environment Agency | |||
|Post-project management and maintenance Other contact forename=Rob | |||
|Post-project management and maintenance Other contact surname=Clapham | |||
|Monitoring1 cost category=Less than 1 k€ | |||
|Monitoring Lead organisation=Environment Agency | |||
|Monitoring Other contact forename=Rob | |||
|Monitoring Other contact surname=Clapham | |||
}} | |||
{{Motivations}} | {{Motivations}} | ||
{{Measures}} | {{Measures | ||
|Planform / Channel pattern=Increase in-channel hydromorphological diversity | |||
}} | |||
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} | {{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} | ||
{{Hydromorphological quality element table row | |||
|Element=Quantity & dynamics of flow | |||
|Monitored before=Yes | |||
|Monitored after=No | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=Yes | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=Yes | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
}} | |||
{{Hydromorphological quality element table row | |||
|Element=Substrate conditions | |||
|Monitored before=Yes | |||
|Monitored after=No | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=Yes | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=Yes | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
}} | |||
{{End table}} | {{End table}} | ||
{{Biological quality elements header}} | {{Biological quality elements header}} | ||
{{Biological quality element table row | |||
|Element=Fish | |||
|Monitored before=Yes | |||
|Monitored after=No | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=No | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=Yes | |||
|Control site used=Yes | |||
}} | |||
{{End table}} | {{End table}} | ||
{{Physico-chemical quality elements header}} | {{Physico-chemical quality elements header}} | ||
{{End table}} | {{End table}} | ||
{{Other responses header}} | {{Other responses header}} | ||
{{Other response table row | |||
|Element=Habitat mapping | |||
|Monitored before=Yes | |||
|Monitored after=No | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=Yes | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=Yes | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
}} | |||
{{End table}} | {{End table}} | ||
{{Monitoring documents}} | {{Monitoring documents}} |
Latest revision as of 13:46, 1 November 2018
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Rob |
Main contact surname | Clapham |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Environment Agency |
Contact organisation web site | |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
Section of the Ouzel in Milton Keynes. The river has modified in the past, for example, channelization works have created a more uniform channel cutting off meanders and reducing hydromorphological diversity in flow and channel bed forms.
Works over an 80m section included 3 single and 1 paired deflector. The aim of these works was to increase diversity of flows and bed profile over this section. It is anticipated that over time, underlying gravels, currently overlaid by fine sediment will be kicked up by localised scour (from deflectors) and also improve habitat quality for invertebrates and for fish spawning.
Monitoring surveys and results
- Pre-enhancement fish survey undertaken.
- Post-enhancement surveys planned.
- River habitat assessment survey (Central Habitat Assessment)
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Other case studies in this subcatchment: Woughton on the Green bank stabilization
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|