Case study:Uxbridge Moor Backwater: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 14: Line 14:
{{Project overview
{{Project overview
|Status=Planned
|Status=Planned
|Themes=Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Social benefits
|Country=England
|Country=England
|Main contact forename=Stewart
|Main contact forename=Stewart
|Main contact surname=Pomeroy
|Main contact surname=Pomeroy
|Contact organisation=Groundwork London
|Contact organisation=Groundwork London
|Partner organisations=Colne valley partnership, LB Hillingdon, groundwork, Lock community
|Multi-site=No
|Multi-site=No
|Project summary=Creation of backwater ponds Reasons for enhancements:<br>Enhance/promote green lung adjacent to Uxbridge industrial estate<br>Erosion of paths<br>Water vole colony appears to have died out<br>Unmanaged and deteriorating
|Project summary=Creation of backwater ponds Reasons for enhancements:<br>Enhance/promote green lung adjacent to Uxbridge industrial estate<br>Erosion of paths<br>Water vole colony appears to have died out<br>Unmanaged and deteriorating
Line 25: Line 27:
{{Toggle_button}}
{{Toggle_button}}
{{Toggle_content_start}}
{{Toggle_content_start}}
{{Case_study_subcatchment
{{Case study subcatchment
|Subcatchment=
|Subcatchment=Colne and GUC (from confluence with Chess to Ash)
   
   
   
   
   
   
     
}}
}}
{{Site
{{Site
|Name=
|WFD water body code=GB106039023090
   
|WFD water body name=Colne and GUC (from confluence with Chess to Ash)
   
|Heavily modified water body=No
     
|Protected species present=No
|WFD water body code=
|Invasive species present=No
     
|WFD (national) typology=
     
|WFD water body name=
     
|Pre-project morphology=
     
|Reference morphology=
     
|Heavily modified water body=
     
|Local site designation=
     
|Site designation=
     
|Protected species present=
     
|Invasive species present=
     
|Species=
     
|Dominant hydrology=
     
|Dominant substrate=
     
|River corridor land use=
     
|Average bankfull channel width category=
     
|Avrg bankfull channel width=
     
|Average bankfull channel depth category=
     
|Avrg1 bankfull channel depth=
     
|Mean discharge category=
     
|Mn discharge=
     
|Average channel gradient category=
     
|Avrg channel gradient=
     
}}
}}
{{Project_background
{{Project background
|Reach length directly affected=
|Reach length directly affected=2000 m
   
|Project started=2008/01/01
   
|Funding sources=Part of Colne valley park access to nature, Environment Agency, Local business
      2000 m
|Project started=
      2008/01/01
|Works started=
     
|Works completed=
     
|Project completed=
     
|Total cost category=
     
|Total1 cost=
     
|Funding sources=
     
|Investigation and design cost category=
     
|Invst and design cost=
     
|Investigation and design Lead organisation=
     
|Investigation and design Other contact forename=
     
|Investigation and design Other contact surname=
     
|Stakeholder1 engagement cost category=
     
|stk engagement cost=
     
|Stakeholder engagement Lead organisation=
     
|Stakeholder engagement Other contact forename=
     
|Stakeholder engagement Other contact surname=
     
|Works1 and supervision cost category=
     
|Wrk and supervision cost=
     
|Works and supervision Lead organisation=
     
|Works and supervision Other contact forename=
     
|Works and supervision Other contact surname=
     
|Post-project1 management and maintenance cost category=
     
|Post-project2 management and maintenance cost=
     
|Post-project management and maintenance Lead organisation=
     
|Post-project management and maintenance Other contact forename=
     
|Post-project management and maintenance Other contact surname=
     
|Monitoring1 cost category=
     
|Monitoring2 cost=
     
|Monitoring Lead organisation=
     
|Monitoring Other contact forename=
     
|Monitoring Other contact surname=
     
|Supplementary funding information=
     
}}
}}
{{Motivations
{{Motivations
|Hydromorphological quality elements=
|Biological quality elements=Vertebrates
   
|Other motivation=Recreation
   
     
|Biological quality elements=
     
|Physico-chemical quality elements=
     
|Specific mitigation=
     
|Other motivation=
     
}}
}}
{{Measures
{{Measures
|Bank and bed modifications measure=
|Planform / Channel pattern=Creation of backwater
   
   
     
|Floodplain / River corridor=
     
|Planform / Channel pattern=
     
|Other technical measure=
     
|Management interventions=
     
|Social measures=
     
|Wider stakeholder / citizen engagement=
     
}}
}}
{{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}}
{{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}}

Latest revision as of 12:28, 1 November 2018

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 51° 32' 26.48" N, 0° 29' 40.39" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Planned
Project web site
Themes Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Social benefits
Country England
Main contact forename Stewart
Main contact surname Pomeroy
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Groundwork London
Contact organisation web site
Partner organisations Colne valley partnership, LB Hillingdon, groundwork, Lock community
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


Creation of backwater ponds Reasons for enhancements:
Enhance/promote green lung adjacent to Uxbridge industrial estate
Erosion of paths
Water vole colony appears to have died out
Unmanaged and deteriorating

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district Thames
River basin Colne

Subcatchment

River name Colne and GUC (from confluence with Chess to Ash)
Area category 100 - 1000 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category 100 - 200 m
Maximum altitude (m) 181181 m <br />0.181 km <br />18,100 cm <br />
Dominant geology Calcareous
Ecoregion Great Britain
Dominant land cover Improved grassland
Waterbody ID GB106039023090



Other case studies in this subcatchment: Colne Brook, Fishery/habitat enhancement on the Grand Union Canal, Habitat Improvements on the River Colne at West Drayton


Site

Name
WFD water body codes GB106039023090
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name Colne and GUC (from confluence with Chess to Ash)
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m) 2000 m2 km <br />200,000 cm <br />
Project started 2008/01/01
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources Part of Colne valley park access to nature, Environment Agency, Local business

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology Vertebrates
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project Recreation


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern Creation of backwater
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information