Case study:The River Deerness Project: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 56: Line 56:
|Project started=2012/07/01
|Project started=2012/07/01
|Project completed=2015/03/31
|Project completed=2015/03/31
|Funding sources=Defra Catchment Restoration Fund; Durham County Council; Durham University
|Funding sources=Defra Catchment Restoration Fund, Durham County Council, Durham University
}}
}}
{{Motivations
{{Motivations

Latest revision as of 12:17, 1 November 2018

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 54° 46' 35.52" N, 1° 36' 37.90" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site http://www.wear-rivers-trust.org.uk/content/deernessrestoration
Themes Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Water quality
Country England
Main contact forename Steve
Main contact surname Hudson
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Wear Rivers Trust
Contact organisation web site http://www.wear-rivers-trust.org.uk/
Partner organisations Durham County Council, Durham University
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
Hedleyhope Burn, The River Deerness Project 2
Cornsay Colliery culvert

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


The Deerness catchment, located west of Durham City, covers 53 km2 and includes the small colliery towns of Ushaw Moor, Esh Winning and Cornsay. Land use is largely agricultural, with woodland cover and several reclaimed open cast and landfill sites. A significant part of the catchment fails the Water Framework Directive for fish, due to the cumulative effects of barriers to the upstream and downstream movement of all fish species and also because of water quality issues (principally phosphate) reflected in altered phytobenthos.

The outcomes of the project are the following: enhanced habitat connectivity throughout both catchments allowing all fish species, migratory and non-migratory, maximum scope to spawn and feed; improved knowledge of fish populations and behaviours through baseline and post-implementation monitoring and evaluation; progress toward/achievement of Good Ecological Status and focus on any residual water quality issues required to achieve good status; establishment of partnership working and joint delivery to be ex-tended under the auspices of the Wear Catchment Management Plan.

Further funding from the Catchment Restoration Fund as well as Durham County Council and Durham University allowed for the provision of a rock pool fish easement at a road culvert on at Cornsay Colliery located on Hedleyhope Burn (a tributary of the River Deerness), completed in September 2012. Hedleyhope Burn is 9.2km in length. The road culvert has been cutting of fish access to 5km of good quality habitat, as under most flow conditions the culvert becomes impassable. This 30m corrugated steel pipe has rapid and shallow uniform flows when water levels are low, and concentrated high velocity flows at high water levels. An extensive erosion pool at the downstream exit to the culvert exhibits the force of water leaving the culvert. A wide concrete step 15 to 20 cm above the surface of the water also obstructs fish passage into the culvert. The solution was to replace the existing scour pool with a series of rock pools to provide a variety of flows for fish, as well as drowning out the concrete step by increasing water levels back into the culvert and creating a slower and deeper flow, improving fish passage. Flood risk was not increased as the site is in a deep depression with no buildings close by. The site is owned by Durham County who also contributed half of the cost. The Wear Rivers Trust helped with the design of the rock pool easement. Due to the location in a high rainfall upland area, 2-3 tonne rocks were used to form a continuous line of bank protection to protect the site a high flow levels. Larger gravels were also used, and willow spiling is due to be installed at a later stage.

Monitoring surveys and results

Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.


The Wear Rivers Trust operates fish and invertebrate surveys to assess fish populations and water health in both catchments. Under CRF a Durham University PhD student, with WRT and volunteer support, will survey below and above each obstruction both before and after restoration activities to measure impacts on those animal groups. Changes in invertebrate communities are not expected as a direct result of the restoration activities but they can inform on the wider food web for fish feeding opportunities, and provide biotic indices of water quality, giving wider insight into local environmental quality. Waste water management is significant across the Lower Wear system, including these two catchments. Supplementary projects, based on a separate volunteer walkover programme, will be developed under the auspices of the Wear River Catchment Management Plan to identify and address point and diffuse sources of pollution, in order to augment CRF actions for improvement to fish movement within these catchments

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


Cornsay Colliery culvert
Broadgate Ford
ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district Northumbria
River basin Wear

Subcatchment

River name Browney from Smallhope Burn Deerness confl
Area category 100 - 1000 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category 200 - 500 m
Maximum altitude (m) 309309 m <br />0.309 km <br />30,900 cm <br />
Dominant geology Calcareous
Ecoregion Great Britain
Dominant land cover Improved grassland
Waterbody ID GB103024077551



Other case studies in this subcatchment: The River Deerness Project 2


Site

Name Deerness
WFD water body codes GB103024077551; GB103024077290
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name Browney from Smallhope Burn Deerness confl; Hedleyhope Burn from Source to Deerness
Pre-project morphology Closed culvert
Reference morphology Bedrock cascade
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use Intensive agriculture (arable), Improved/semi-improved grassland/pasture
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m) 130130 m <br />0.13 km <br />13,000 cm <br />
Project started 2012/07/01
Works started
Works completed
Project completed 2015/03/31
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources Defra Catchment Restoration Fund, Durham County Council, Durham University

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure Water quality, Barriers to fish migration
Hydromorphology Continuity for organisms, Continuity of sediment transport
Biology Phytobenthos, Fish
Physico-chemical Phosphate
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications creation of rock pools downstream of culvert
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern Remove obstacles in the riverbed, Removing barriers to water organisms migration in the river
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other Establishment of partnership working and joint delivery to be extended under the auspices of the Wear Catchment Management Plan.


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
[[]] No No No No No

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents




Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information