Case study:The River Deerness Project: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(38 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Case study status | {{Case study status | ||
|Approval status= | |Approval status=Approved | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Location | {{Location | ||
|Location=54. | |Location=54.776533980091, -1.6105270385742 | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Project overview | {{Project overview | ||
|Status= | |Status=Complete | ||
|Project web site url=www.wear-rivers-trust.org.uk/content/deernessrestoration | |Project web site url=www.wear-rivers-trust.org.uk/content/deernessrestoration | ||
|Themes=Habitat and biodiversity, Water quality | |Themes=Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Water quality | ||
|Country=England | |Country=England | ||
|Main contact forename=Steve | |Main contact forename=Steve | ||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
|Contact organisation url=www.wear-rivers-trust.org.uk/ | |Contact organisation url=www.wear-rivers-trust.org.uk/ | ||
|Partner organisations=Durham County Council, Durham University | |Partner organisations=Durham County Council, Durham University | ||
|Multi-site=Yes | |Multi-site=Yes | ||
|Project summary=The Deerness catchment, located west of Durham City, covers 53 km2 and includes the small colliery towns of Ushaw Moor, Esh Winning and Cornsay. Land use is largely agricultural, with woodland cover and several reclaimed open cast and landfill sites. A significant part of the catchment fails the Water Framework Directive for fish, due to the cumulative effects of barriers to the upstream and downstream movement of all fish | |Project picture=Cornsay Colliery culvert.jpg | ||
|Picture description=Cornsay Colliery culvert | |||
|Project summary=The Deerness catchment, located west of Durham City, covers 53 km2 and includes the small colliery towns of Ushaw Moor, Esh Winning and Cornsay. Land use is largely agricultural, with woodland cover and several reclaimed open cast and landfill sites. A significant part of the catchment fails the Water Framework Directive for fish, due to the cumulative effects of barriers to the upstream and downstream movement of all fish species and also because of water quality issues (principally phosphate) reflected in altered phytobenthos. | |||
The | The outcomes of the project are the following: enhanced habitat connectivity throughout both catchments allowing all fish species, migratory and non-migratory, maximum scope to spawn and feed; improved knowledge of fish populations and behaviours through baseline and post-implementation monitoring and evaluation; progress toward/achievement of Good Ecological Status and focus on any residual water quality issues required to achieve good status; establishment of partnership working and joint delivery to be ex-tended under the auspices of the Wear Catchment Management Plan. | ||
The Wear Rivers Trust operates fish and invertebrate surveys to assess fish populations and water health in both catchments. Under CRF a Durham University PhD student, with WRT and volunteer support, will survey below and above each obstruction both before and after restoration activities to measure impacts on those animal groups. Changes in invertebrate communities are not expected as a direct result of the restoration activities but they can inform on the wider food web for fish feeding opportunities, and provide biotic indices of water quality, giving wider insight into local environmental quality. Waste water management is significant across the Lower Wear system, including these two catchments. Supplementary projects, based on a separate volunteer walkover programme, will be developed under the auspices of the Wear River Catchment Management Plan to identify and address point and diffuse sources of pollution, in order to augment CRF actions for improvement to fish movement within these catchments. | Further funding from the Catchment Restoration Fund as well as Durham County Council and Durham University allowed for the provision of a rock pool fish easement at a road culvert on at Cornsay Colliery located on Hedleyhope Burn (a tributary of the River Deerness), completed in September 2012. Hedleyhope Burn is 9.2km in length. The road culvert has been cutting of fish access to 5km of good quality habitat, as under most flow conditions the culvert becomes impassable. This 30m corrugated steel pipe has rapid and shallow uniform flows when water levels are low, and concentrated high velocity flows at high water levels. An extensive erosion pool at the downstream exit to the culvert exhibits the force of water leaving the culvert. A wide concrete step 15 to 20 cm above the surface of the water also obstructs fish passage into the culvert. The solution was to replace the existing scour pool with a series of rock pools to provide a variety of flows for fish, as well as drowning out the concrete step by increasing water levels back into the culvert and creating a slower and deeper flow, improving fish passage. Flood risk was not increased as the site is in a deep depression with no buildings close by. The site is owned by Durham County who also contributed half of the cost. The Wear Rivers Trust helped with the design of the rock pool easement. Due to the location in a high rainfall upland area, 2-3 tonne rocks were used to form a continuous line of bank protection to protect the site a high flow levels. Larger gravels were also used, and willow spiling is due to be installed at a later stage. | ||
|Monitoring surveys and results=The Wear Rivers Trust operates fish and invertebrate surveys to assess fish populations and water health in both catchments. Under CRF a Durham University PhD student, with WRT and volunteer support, will survey below and above each obstruction both before and after restoration activities to measure impacts on those animal groups. Changes in invertebrate communities are not expected as a direct result of the restoration activities but they can inform on the wider food web for fish feeding opportunities, and provide biotic indices of water quality, giving wider insight into local environmental quality. Waste water management is significant across the Lower Wear system, including these two catchments. Supplementary projects, based on a separate volunteer walkover programme, will be developed under the auspices of the Wear River Catchment Management Plan to identify and address point and diffuse sources of pollution, in order to augment CRF actions for improvement to fish movement within these catchments | |||
}} | |||
{{Image gallery}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=Cornsay Colliery culvert.jpg | |||
|Caption=Cornsay Colliery culvert | |||
}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=Broadgate Ford.jpg | |||
|Caption=Broadgate Ford | |||
}} | |||
{{Image gallery end}} | |||
{{Toggle button}} | |||
{{Toggle content start}} | |||
{{Case study subcatchment | |||
|Subcatchment=Browney from Smallhope Burn Deerness confl | |||
}} | |||
{{Site | |||
|Name=Deerness | |||
|WFD water body code=GB103024077551; GB103024077290 | |||
|WFD water body name=Browney from Smallhope Burn Deerness confl; Hedleyhope Burn from Source to Deerness | |||
|Pre-project morphology=Closed culvert, | |||
|Reference morphology=Bedrock cascade, | |||
|Heavily modified water body=No | |||
|Protected species present=No | |||
|Invasive species present=No | |||
|River corridor land use=Intensive agriculture (arable), Improved/semi-improved grassland/pasture, | |||
}} | |||
{{Project background | |||
|Reach length directly affected=130 | |||
|Project started=2012/07/01 | |||
|Project completed=2015/03/31 | |||
|Funding sources=Defra Catchment Restoration Fund, Durham County Council, Durham University | |||
}} | |||
{{Motivations | |||
|Specific mitigation=Water quality, Barriers to fish migration | |||
|Hydromorphological quality elements=Continuity for organisms, Continuity of sediment transport, | |||
|Biological quality elements=Phytobenthos, Fish | |||
|Physico-chemical quality elements=Phosphate | |||
}} | |||
{{Measures | |||
|Bank and bed modifications measure=creation of rock pools downstream of culvert, | |||
|Planform / Channel pattern=Remove obstacles in the riverbed, Removing barriers to water organisms migration in the river | |||
|Wider stakeholder / citizen engagement=Establishment of partnership working and joint delivery to be extended under the auspices of the Wear Catchment Management Plan. | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} | {{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} | ||
{{End table}} | {{End table}} | ||
{{Biological quality elements header}} | {{Biological quality elements header}} | ||
{{Biological quality element table row | |||
|Monitored before=No | |||
|Monitored after=No | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=No | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=No | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
}} | |||
{{End table}} | {{End table}} | ||
{{Physico-chemical quality elements header}} | {{Physico-chemical quality elements header}} | ||
Line 38: | Line 85: | ||
{{End table}} | {{End table}} | ||
{{Monitoring documents}} | {{Monitoring documents}} | ||
{{Case study monitoring documents | |||
|Monitoring document=NO006 monitoring framework table.docx | |||
|Description=RRC Monitoring table - Deerness | |||
}} | |||
{{Monitoring documents end}} | {{Monitoring documents end}} | ||
{{Additional Documents}} | {{Additional Documents}} | ||
{{Case study documents | |||
|File name=CRF020 Project Briefing Note - Deerness.pdf | |||
|Description=CRF Project briefing note - Deerness | |||
}} | |||
{{Additional Documents end}} | {{Additional Documents end}} | ||
{{Additional links and references header}} | {{Additional links and references header}} | ||
{{Additional links and references footer}} | {{Additional links and references footer}} | ||
{{Supplementary Information}} | {{Supplementary Information}} | ||
{{Toggle content end}} |
Latest revision as of 12:17, 1 November 2018
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | http://www.wear-rivers-trust.org.uk/content/deernessrestoration |
Themes | Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Water quality |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Steve |
Main contact surname | Hudson |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Wear Rivers Trust |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.wear-rivers-trust.org.uk/ |
Partner organisations | Durham County Council, Durham University |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
Hedleyhope Burn, The River Deerness Project 2 |
Project summary
The Deerness catchment, located west of Durham City, covers 53 km2 and includes the small colliery towns of Ushaw Moor, Esh Winning and Cornsay. Land use is largely agricultural, with woodland cover and several reclaimed open cast and landfill sites. A significant part of the catchment fails the Water Framework Directive for fish, due to the cumulative effects of barriers to the upstream and downstream movement of all fish species and also because of water quality issues (principally phosphate) reflected in altered phytobenthos.
The outcomes of the project are the following: enhanced habitat connectivity throughout both catchments allowing all fish species, migratory and non-migratory, maximum scope to spawn and feed; improved knowledge of fish populations and behaviours through baseline and post-implementation monitoring and evaluation; progress toward/achievement of Good Ecological Status and focus on any residual water quality issues required to achieve good status; establishment of partnership working and joint delivery to be ex-tended under the auspices of the Wear Catchment Management Plan.
Further funding from the Catchment Restoration Fund as well as Durham County Council and Durham University allowed for the provision of a rock pool fish easement at a road culvert on at Cornsay Colliery located on Hedleyhope Burn (a tributary of the River Deerness), completed in September 2012. Hedleyhope Burn is 9.2km in length. The road culvert has been cutting of fish access to 5km of good quality habitat, as under most flow conditions the culvert becomes impassable. This 30m corrugated steel pipe has rapid and shallow uniform flows when water levels are low, and concentrated high velocity flows at high water levels. An extensive erosion pool at the downstream exit to the culvert exhibits the force of water leaving the culvert. A wide concrete step 15 to 20 cm above the surface of the water also obstructs fish passage into the culvert. The solution was to replace the existing scour pool with a series of rock pools to provide a variety of flows for fish, as well as drowning out the concrete step by increasing water levels back into the culvert and creating a slower and deeper flow, improving fish passage. Flood risk was not increased as the site is in a deep depression with no buildings close by. The site is owned by Durham County who also contributed half of the cost. The Wear Rivers Trust helped with the design of the rock pool easement. Due to the location in a high rainfall upland area, 2-3 tonne rocks were used to form a continuous line of bank protection to protect the site a high flow levels. Larger gravels were also used, and willow spiling is due to be installed at a later stage.
Monitoring surveys and results
The Wear Rivers Trust operates fish and invertebrate surveys to assess fish populations and water health in both catchments. Under CRF a Durham University PhD student, with WRT and volunteer support, will survey below and above each obstruction both before and after restoration activities to measure impacts on those animal groups. Changes in invertebrate communities are not expected as a direct result of the restoration activities but they can inform on the wider food web for fish feeding opportunities, and provide biotic indices of water quality, giving wider insight into local environmental quality. Waste water management is significant across the Lower Wear system, including these two catchments. Supplementary projects, based on a separate volunteer walkover programme, will be developed under the auspices of the Wear River Catchment Management Plan to identify and address point and diffuse sources of pollution, in order to augment CRF actions for improvement to fish movement within these catchments
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Other case studies in this subcatchment: The River Deerness Project 2
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|