Case study:Beverley Brook d/s of Rock’s Lane: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
{{Project background | {{Project background | ||
|Reach length directly affected=200 m | |Reach length directly affected=200 m | ||
|Funding sources=Environment Agency, SITA, Landfill Funding, Grantscape | |Funding sources=Environment Agency, SITA Trust, Landfill Funding, Grantscape | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Motivations | {{Motivations |
Latest revision as of 12:08, 1 November 2018
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Project overview
Status | Planned |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Fisheries, Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Social benefits, Urban |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Joanna |
Main contact surname | Heisse |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Environment Agency |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/environment-agency |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
Structural tree line/invertebrate productivity for foraging bats, plus bat roost potential; backwater; scalloped bays for marginal plants. See also the project ‘Barnes Common’, a specific reedbed creation project.
Best practice management plan for commuting, foraging and roosting bats; watervoles, fisheries benefits and flood defence benefits; improvement of bankside for marginal plants and/or fringing reeds, strengthening wild life corridor along brook for birds, water voles, grass snakes, rats etc; enhance bankside marginal vegetation and provide suitable habitat for birds, invertebrates, plus potential for dispersal for the BAP species from London wetland centre e.g. water vole, grass snake; readily accessible to the public; forage area for bats.
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Other case studies in this subcatchment: Anton Crescent Wetlands Regeneration, Ashlone Wharf FCRM scheme, Barn Elms Sports Ground, Barn Elms Wetland Centre, South West London, Barnes Common, Barnes Common improvements, Beverley Brook Flow control structures, Beverley Park, Cuddington Park, Horne Way Weir... further results
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|