Case study:Letting the Dove Flow 2: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
{{Toggle content start}} | {{Toggle content start}} | ||
{{Case study subcatchment}} | {{Case study subcatchment}} | ||
{{Site}} | {{Site | ||
{{Project background}} | |Name=Dovedale | ||
{{Motivations}} | |WFD water body code=GB104028057780 | ||
{{Measures}} | |WFD (national) typology=Calcareous, | ||
|WFD water body name=River Dove source to River Manifold | |||
|Pre-project morphology=Impounded, Reinforced banks, | |||
|Reference morphology=Actively meandering, Pool-riffle, | |||
|Desired post project morphology=Actively meandering, Pool-riffle, | |||
|Heavily modified water body=No | |||
|Site designation=EU - Special Area of Conservation | |||
|Local site designation=SSSI (Site of Special Scientific Interest), NNR | |||
|Protected species present=Yes | |||
|Invasive species present=Yes | |||
|Species=white clawed crayfish (Austropotamobius pallipes), bullhead (Cottus gobio), | |||
|Dominant substrate=Cobble, Gravel, | |||
|River corridor land use=Broadleaf/mixed woodland (semi natural), Rock/scree or sand dunes, Rough unimproved grassland/pasture, | |||
}} | |||
{{Project background | |||
|Reach length directly affected=10000 | |||
|Project started=2015 | |||
|Investigation and design Lead organisation=Natural England | |||
|Stakeholder engagement Lead organisation=National Trust | |||
}} | |||
{{Motivations | |||
|Specific mitigation=Impoundments (not hydropower), | |||
|Hydromorphological quality elements=Continuity of sediment transport, Quantity & dynamics of flow, | |||
|Biological quality elements=Fish | |||
|Physico-chemical quality elements=, | |||
}} | |||
{{Measures | |||
|Bank and bed modifications measure=removing or breaching weirs and reinforcements, Allowing stone weirs and bank reinforcements to break down, Removal of bank reinforcements, | |||
|Floodplain / River corridor=Improvement of natural flows, Improve longitudinal connectivity, Introducing large woody debris, r | |||
|Planform / Channel pattern=Channel naturalisation, Improvement of channel morphology, Removal of impoundments, | |||
|Management interventions=Monitoring strategy, | |||
|Social measures=Awareness raising, Engagement with a wide range of stakeholders, Improved leisure environment for angling and recreation, | |||
}} | |||
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} | {{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} | ||
{{End table}} | {{End table}} |
Latest revision as of 10:45, 10 July 2018
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Project overview
Status | In progress |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Social benefits |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Tim |
Main contact surname | Brooks |
Main contact user ID | User:TBrooks |
Contact organisation | Environment Agency |
Contact organisation web site | |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
The river Dove in Dovedale and Wolfscote Dale is one of the most renowned river stretches in Britain. In recognition of its ecological value, the river is designated as part of the nationally important Dove Valley and Biggin Dale Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI). The river Dove is further recognised as being internationally important for its wildlife and is designated as part of the Peak District Dales Special Area of Conservation (SAC). Dovedale is also a National Nature Reserve (NNR) managed by the National Trust.
The 2010 Site Improvement Plan (SIP) for the Peak District Dales SAC states that weirs, dams and other structures create pressures on the river Dove for White Clawed Crayfish, Bullhead and Brook Lamprey and prevent natural hydrological processes happening, limiting natural habitat development.It recommends that this should be addressed through a river restoration strategy.
Letting the Dove Flow is the name for the river restoration strategy that builds on the findings of previous studies and aims to develop a long term plan to restore the river and a partnership to implement short, medium and long term.
Monitoring surveys and results
A heritage audit was commissioned to assess the cultural and historic significance of the 177 weirs recorded and heritage assets along the 10km of the riverine SSSI in order to inform restoration proposals. The report provides a record of the built structures and includes an assessment of their historical significance along with recommendations for recording and interpretation.
A River Habitat Survey (RHS) has been undertaken over the last two years to provide an update to the last one undertaken in 2012. This will provide a useful baseline for future RHS post weir removal on a reach basis and throughout the entire SSSI.
A specific ecological monitoring strategy has been put in place to supplement routine EA monitoring locations within the SSSI. Additional fish and invertebrate surveys will be undertaken pre and post weir removal.
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchment
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|