Case study:Cuddington Park: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
{{Project overview | {{Project overview | ||
|Status=Planned | |Status=Planned | ||
|Themes=Habitat and biodiversity, Spatial planning | |||
|Country=England | |Country=England | ||
|Main contact forename=Grahame | |Main contact forename=Grahame | ||
Line 24: | Line 25: | ||
{{Toggle_button}} | {{Toggle_button}} | ||
{{Toggle_content_start}} | {{Toggle_content_start}} | ||
{{ | {{Case study subcatchment | ||
|Subcatchment= | |Subcatchment=Beverley Brook (Motspur Park to Thames) and Pyl Brook at West Barnes | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Site | {{Site | ||
|WFD water body code=GB106039022850 | |||
|WFD water body name=Beverley Brook (Motspur Park to Thames) and Pyl Brook at West Barnes | |||
|Heavily modified water body=No | |||
|Protected species present=No | |||
|WFD water body code= | |Invasive species present=No | ||
|WFD water body name= | |||
|Heavily modified water body= | |||
|Protected species present= | |||
|Invasive species present= | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Project_background | {{Project_background | ||
Line 157: | Line 108: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Motivations | {{Motivations | ||
|Other motivation=Landscape enhancement | |||
|Other motivation= | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Measures}} | |||
{{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}} | {{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}} | ||
{{End_table}} | {{End_table}} |
Latest revision as of 13:11, 28 June 2017
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Location: 51° 22' 1.88" N, 0° 14' 24.80" W
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.
Project overview
Status | Planned |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Habitat and biodiversity, Spatial planning |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Grahame |
Main contact surname | Mark |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | |
Contact organisation web site | |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.
Project summary
Edit project overview to modify the project summary.
Asset management planning identifying environmental enhancements.
Monitoring surveys and results
This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Lessons learnt
This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Other case studies in this subcatchment: Anton Crescent Wetlands Regeneration, Ashlone Wharf FCRM scheme, Barn Elms Sports Ground, Barn Elms Wetland Centre, South West London, Barnes Common, Barnes Common improvements, Beverley Brook Flow control structures, Beverley Brook d/s of Rock’s Lane, Beverley Park, Horne Way Weir... further results
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|