Case study:Rainham Marshes: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(10 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
|Location=51.5075187683105, 0.184523373842239 | |Location=51.5075187683105, 0.184523373842239 | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{Project overview | ||
|Status= | |Status=Planned | ||
|Themes=Habitat and biodiversity, Social benefits | |||
|Country=England | |||
|Main contact forename=Jennifer | |||
|Main contact surname=Norman | |||
|Multi-site=No | |||
|Themes= | |Project summary=Creation of junction nodes for Water Voles and re-wetting sections of the ditch network within the SSSI. Survey of Water Vole population on the site. The Inner Thames Marshes is a stronghold for Water Vole. The condition of the SSSI is poor and is currently unmanaged. The ditch network is also unmanged and some ditches are becoming silted up and dry. | ||
|Country= | |||
|Main contact forename= | |||
|Main contact surname= | |||
|Multi-site= | |||
| | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Image_gallery}} | {{Image_gallery}} | ||
Line 50: | Line 25: | ||
{{Toggle_button}} | {{Toggle_button}} | ||
{{Toggle_content_start}} | {{Toggle_content_start}} | ||
{{ | {{Case study subcatchment | ||
|Subcatchment= | |Subcatchment=Southall Sewer and Runningwater Brook (Ingrebourne) | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Site | {{Site | ||
|WFD water body code=GB106037028090 | |||
|WFD water body name=Southall Sewer and Runningwater Brook (Ingrebourne) | |||
|Heavily modified water body=No | |||
|Protected species present=No | |||
|WFD water body code= | |Invasive species present=No | ||
|WFD water body name= | |||
|Heavily modified water body= | |||
|Protected species present= | |||
|Invasive species present= | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{Project background | ||
|Reach length directly affected= | |Reach length directly affected=300 m | ||
|Project started=2010/01/01 | |||
|Total cost category=50 - 100 k€ | |||
|Funding sources=£42k secured from NEAS led EA tidal sluice upgrade project, mitigation money. | |||
|Project started= | |||
|Total cost category= | |||
|Funding sources= | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Motivations | {{Motivations | ||
|Hydromorphological quality elements= | |Hydromorphological quality elements=Quantity & dynamics of flow | ||
|Biological quality elements=Vertebrates | |||
|Biological quality elements= | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Measures | {{Measures | ||
|Floodplain / River corridor=Habitat enhancement, | |||
|Wider stakeholder / citizen engagement=Survey work, Wildlife surveys, | |||
|Floodplain / River corridor= | |||
|Wider stakeholder / citizen engagement= | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}} | {{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}} |
Latest revision as of 08:48, 28 June 2017
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Location: 51° 30' 27.07" N, 0° 11' 4.28" E
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.
Project overview
Status | Planned |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Habitat and biodiversity, Social benefits |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Jennifer |
Main contact surname | Norman |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | |
Contact organisation web site | |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.
Project summary
Edit project overview to modify the project summary.
Creation of junction nodes for Water Voles and re-wetting sections of the ditch network within the SSSI. Survey of Water Vole population on the site. The Inner Thames Marshes is a stronghold for Water Vole. The condition of the SSSI is poor and is currently unmanaged. The ditch network is also unmanged and some ditches are becoming silted up and dry.
Monitoring surveys and results
This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Lessons learnt
This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Other case studies in this subcatchment: Ferry Lane North drainage realignment
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|