Case study:Beverley Brook Flow control structures: Difference between revisions
Hazel Wilson (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
|Contact organisation=Environment Agency | |Contact organisation=Environment Agency | ||
|Contact organisation url=www.gov.uk/government/organisations/environment-agency | |Contact organisation url=www.gov.uk/government/organisations/environment-agency | ||
|Partner organisations=Friends of Barnes Common, London Borough of Richmond upon Thames, | |Partner organisations=Friends of Barnes Common, London Borough of Richmond upon Thames, | ||
|Multi-site=No | |Multi-site=No | ||
|Project summary=Model the effects of altering the two flow control structures with a view to sending more low flows down the natural channel and taking excess flow downs the two culverts when water levels rise. The Beverley Brook natural channel only takes 20% of the flow during normal flow rates, which impacts the geomorphology, silt carrying capacity and habitat value of the brook downstream of the flow control structures. | |Project summary=Model the effects of altering the two flow control structures with a view to sending more low flows down the natural channel and taking excess flow downs the two culverts when water levels rise. The Beverley Brook natural channel only takes 20% of the flow during normal flow rates, which impacts the geomorphology, silt carrying capacity and habitat value of the brook downstream of the flow control structures. | ||
Line 111: | Line 111: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Motivations | {{Motivations | ||
| | |Specific mitigation=Impoundments (not hydropower), | ||
|Hydromorphological quality elements=Channel pattern/planform, Freshwater flow regime, | |||
| | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Measures | {{Measures | ||
|Management interventions=Modelling, Monitoring strategy, | |||
|Management interventions= | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}} | {{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}} |
Latest revision as of 15:16, 6 June 2017
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Environmental flows and water resources, Fisheries, Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Joanna |
Main contact surname | Heisse |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Environment Agency |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/environment-agency |
Partner organisations | Friends of Barnes Common, London Borough of Richmond upon Thames |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
Model the effects of altering the two flow control structures with a view to sending more low flows down the natural channel and taking excess flow downs the two culverts when water levels rise. The Beverley Brook natural channel only takes 20% of the flow during normal flow rates, which impacts the geomorphology, silt carrying capacity and habitat value of the brook downstream of the flow control structures.
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Other case studies in this subcatchment: Anton Crescent Wetlands Regeneration, Ashlone Wharf FCRM scheme, Barn Elms Sports Ground, Barn Elms Wetland Centre, South West London, Barnes Common, Barnes Common improvements, Beverley Brook d/s of Rock’s Lane, Beverley Park, Cuddington Park, Horne Way Weir... further results
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|