Case study:River Nar Restoration Project: Difference between revisions
Hazel Wilson (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
|Picture description=Large woody debris - River Nar, West Acre | |Picture description=Large woody debris - River Nar, West Acre | ||
|Project summary=Chalk streams are a globally rare and threatened habitat. The Nar is 42 km long, the second longest chalk stream in Norfolk and designated a SSSI. This river catchment is in a rural area with intensive arable farming being the main land use. The upper half of the river flows over chalk, whilst the lower half descends into drained fenland, making the river catchment particularly diverse in form. The river fails to meet the standards of the Water Framework Directive for fish abundance, quantity and dynamics of flow. Poor morphology and poor water quality underpin this failure and require addressing. This project aims to deliver three large-scale reach restorations, improving morphology, water quality, biodiversity and hence ecosystem function. | |Project summary=Chalk streams are a globally rare and threatened habitat. The Nar is 42 km long, the second longest chalk stream in Norfolk and designated a SSSI. This river catchment is in a rural area with intensive arable farming being the main land use. The upper half of the river flows over chalk, whilst the lower half descends into drained fenland, making the river catchment particularly diverse in form. The river fails to meet the standards of the Water Framework Directive for fish abundance, quantity and dynamics of flow. Poor morphology and poor water quality underpin this failure and require addressing. This project aims to deliver three large-scale reach restorations, improving morphology, water quality, biodiversity and hence ecosystem function. | ||
Community Involvement:<br> | |||
- Some maintenance of completed restored sections is carried out by local fisherman. This allows them to contribute to the health of the catchment. A sense of wider public ownership is fostered by river walks, talks and consultations. A River Nar Conservation Group has also been organised to encourage community involvement in the River Nar restoration project, where we have discussed ideas such as getting school children involved with monitoring fresh water invertebrates <br> | |||
- The Project Officer is working with farmers to help them put in place measures to retain soils and prevent run-off of nutrients and pesticides | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Image gallery}} | {{Image gallery}} | ||
Line 47: | Line 51: | ||
|WFD water body name=Nar to confl with Blackborough Drain | |WFD water body name=Nar to confl with Blackborough Drain | ||
|Heavily modified water body=No | |Heavily modified water body=No | ||
|Site designation=UK - Site of Special Scientific Interest | |||
|Protected species present=No | |Protected species present=No | ||
|Invasive species present=No | |Invasive species present=No | ||
Line 52: | Line 57: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Project background | {{Project background | ||
|Project started=2012/05/01 | |||
|Project completed=2014/10/31 | |||
|Total cost category=500 - 1000 k€ | |Total cost category=500 - 1000 k€ | ||
|Total1 cost= | |Total1 cost=965 | ||
|Funding sources=Catchment Restoration | |Funding sources=Defra Catchment Restoration Fund | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Motivations | {{Motivations | ||
Line 65: | Line 72: | ||
{{Measures | {{Measures | ||
|Floodplain / River corridor=Floodplain reconnection | |Floodplain / River corridor=Floodplain reconnection | ||
|Planform / Channel pattern=Channel naturalisation | |Planform / Channel pattern=Re-meandering, Channel naturalisation, | ||
|Social measures= | |Social measures=Community involvement, Heritage walks, Community consultation, Engagement with schools, | ||
|Wider stakeholder / citizen engagement= | |Wider stakeholder / citizen engagement=Work with farmers and land managers, Local support, Monitoring and survey projects, | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} | {{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} |
Latest revision as of 08:47, 6 June 2017
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Economic aspects, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Social benefits, Water quality |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Mark |
Main contact surname | Watson |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | WWF-UK |
Contact organisation web site | |
Partner organisations | Coca-Cola, Natural England, Environment Agency, Norfolk Rivers Drainage Board, Castle Acre Fishing Syndicate, West Acre Fishing Syndicate, private landowners, Norfolk Wildlife Trust, Mileham Common Charity Trustees |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
River Nar Castle Acre Common WEG project |
Project summary
Chalk streams are a globally rare and threatened habitat. The Nar is 42 km long, the second longest chalk stream in Norfolk and designated a SSSI. This river catchment is in a rural area with intensive arable farming being the main land use. The upper half of the river flows over chalk, whilst the lower half descends into drained fenland, making the river catchment particularly diverse in form. The river fails to meet the standards of the Water Framework Directive for fish abundance, quantity and dynamics of flow. Poor morphology and poor water quality underpin this failure and require addressing. This project aims to deliver three large-scale reach restorations, improving morphology, water quality, biodiversity and hence ecosystem function.
Community Involvement:
- Some maintenance of completed restored sections is carried out by local fisherman. This allows them to contribute to the health of the catchment. A sense of wider public ownership is fostered by river walks, talks and consultations. A River Nar Conservation Group has also been organised to encourage community involvement in the River Nar restoration project, where we have discussed ideas such as getting school children involved with monitoring fresh water invertebrates
- The Project Officer is working with farmers to help them put in place measures to retain soils and prevent run-off of nutrients and pesticides
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Other case studies in this subcatchment: Castle Acre Rehabilitation Project, Nar SSSI project, Narborough Rehabilitation Project, River Nar Castle Acre Common WEG project, River Nar, Mileham River Restoration Project, West Lexham Rehabilitation Project
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|