Case study:Firs Farm Wetlands: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 65: | Line 65: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Measures | {{Measures | ||
|Bank and bed modifications measure=Deculverting, | |Bank and bed modifications measure=Deculverting, Ponds and pools inside the wetland | ||
|Floodplain / River corridor=Creation of wetland, Creation of wet woodland, Creation of pond, Creation of side channel, Deculverting, Extensive planting, Sustainable urban drainage ponds (SUDs), Floodplain creation, | |Floodplain / River corridor=Creation of wetland, Creation of wet woodland, Creation of pond, Creation of side channel, Deculverting, Extensive planting, Sustainable urban drainage ponds (SUDs), Floodplain creation, | ||
|Social measures= | |Social measures=Public amenity and perception, Community involvement, Community Education, Engagement with schools, | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} | {{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} |
Latest revision as of 14:42, 5 June 2017
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Location: 51° 37' 41.59" N, 0° 5' 12.88" W
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.
Project overview
Status | In progress |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Environmental flows and water resources, Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Monitoring, Social benefits, Water quality, Urban |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Ian |
Main contact surname | Russell |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | London Borough of Enfield |
Contact organisation web site | http://enfield.gov.uk/ |
Partner organisations | Environment Agency, Thames Water, Greater London Authority, Thames 21, Friends of Firs Farm |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.
Project summary
This case study hasn’t got any project summary, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Monitoring surveys and results
This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Lessons learnt
This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Other case studies in this subcatchment: Pymmes Park Wetlands
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|