Case study:River Burn, North Creake: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 41: Line 41:
}}
}}
{{Measures
{{Measures
|Floodplain / River corridor=Introduction of livestock fencing, Tree planting,  
|Floodplain / River corridor=Livestock fencing, Tree planting,
|Social measures=Community involvement, volunteer engagement,  
|Social measures=Community involvement, volunteer engagement,
}}
}}
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}}
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}}

Revision as of 10:14, 2 June 2017

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 52° 52' 17.85" N, 0° 45' 44.54" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site http://www.norfolkriverstrust.org/trust_project/river-burn/
Themes Social benefits
Country England
Main contact forename the
Main contact surname RRC
Main contact user ID User:JoshRRC
Contact organisation Norfolk Rivers Trust
Contact organisation web site
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Project picture

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


It is part of the Norfolk Rivers Trust’s mission to gain the active participation of the community. Stakeholders help us to set objectives, keep us informed about issues on the ground such as pollution and actively volunteer to make many more worthwhile projects possible.

Norfolk Rivers Trust have recently started to work in the Burn catchment, and we were very pleased to receive over 80 people at our latest event at North Creake Village Hall.

An opportunity to restore a section of the River Burn by fencing off livestock and tree planting has already been identified with the aid of the landowner, and this project will be greatly helped by the help of volunteers. Norfolk Rivers Trust are grateful for the help which The Creake Abbey Trust has given to make this project happen, and hope that more projects will be initiated in the near future.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name
WFD water body codes GB105034055750
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started 2014/01/01
Works started
Works completed
Project completed 2015/03/31
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project Stakeholder engagement


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor Livestock fencing, Tree planting
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement) Community involvement, volunteer engagement
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information