Case study:The Babina Restoration Project: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(20 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{Case study status | ||
|Approval status= | |Approval status=Approved | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Location | {{Location | ||
|Location= | |Location=45.424763, 29.411763 | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Project overview | {{Project overview | ||
Line 14: | Line 11: | ||
|Main contact forename=Marian | |Main contact forename=Marian | ||
|Main contact surname=Tudor | |Main contact surname=Tudor | ||
|Contact organisation=The Danube Delta National Institute for Research and Development, Tulcea | |Contact organisation=The Danube Delta National Institute for Research and Development, Tulcea | ||
|Contact organisation url=www.ddni.ro | |Contact organisation url=www.ddni.ro | ||
|Partner organisations=The Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve Authority | |||
|Multi-site=No | |Multi-site=No | ||
|Project picture=Babina polder - present situation.JPG | |Project picture=Babina polder - present situation.JPG | ||
|Picture description=The Babina - present situation | |Picture description=The Babina - present situation | ||
|Project summary=Until the 20th century vast areas of the Danube Delta faced only minimal human impacts | |||
through extensive fishery and reed harvesting. Since then the Danube Delta has undergone | |||
multiple human impacts like embankment, channelization and drainage. Moreover, large | |||
areas were diked and the polders used for agriculture. | |||
The Babina polder (2.100 ha) was reconnected to the Danube in 1994 and recovery has been monitored by the Danube Delta National Institute for Research and Development. | |||
Within a few years a redevelopment of the site-specific biodiversity occurred and ecosystem services like nutrient retention and fish recruitment became obvious. Additionally, the reconnected polder enable reed harvesting, grazing, fishing and ecotourism. | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Image gallery}} | {{Image gallery}} | ||
{{Case study image | {{Case study image | ||
Line 348: | Line 58: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Image_gallery_end}} | {{Image_gallery_end}} | ||
{{ | {{Toggle button}} | ||
{{Toggle content start}} | |||
{{Case study subcatchment | |||
|Subcatchment=Chilia Branch | |||
}} | |||
{{Site | |||
|Name=Agricultural polder Babina | |||
|WFD water body code=RORW14.1_B6 | |||
|WFD (national) typology=RO15 | |||
|Pre-project morphology=Embanked, Agricultural land | |||
|Reference morphology=Sinuous, Artificial channel | |||
|Heavily modified water body=No | |||
|Site designation=International - RAMSAR site | |||
|Local site designation=Biosphere Reserves | |||
|Protected species present=No | |||
|Invasive species present=No | |||
|Dominant hydrology=Artificially regulated, Floodplain area | |||
|Dominant substrate=Sand,Clay | |||
|River corridor land use=Grassland, Wetland | |||
|Average bankfull channel width category=10 - 50 m | |||
|Average bankfull channel depth category=0.5 - 2 m | |||
|Avrg1 bankfull channel depth=1.95 | |||
|Mean discharge category=more than 1000 m³/s | |||
|Mn discharge=3606 | |||
|Average channel gradient category=0.01 - 0.1 | |||
|Avrg channel gradient=0.015 | |||
}} | |||
{{Project background | |||
|Project started=1991/01/01 | |||
|Works started=1994/04/01 | |||
|Works completed=1994/05/01 | |||
|Total cost category=10 - 50 k€ | |||
|Total1 cost=2407 | |||
|Funding sources=GEF biodiversity preservation project in the Danube Delta | |||
|Investigation and design Lead organisation=The Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve Authority, Tulcea | |||
|Investigation and design Other contact forename=Marian | |||
|Investigation and design Other contact surname=Tudor | |||
|Stakeholder engagement Lead organisation=The Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve Authority, Tulcea | |||
|Stakeholder engagement Other contact forename=Marian | |||
|Stakeholder engagement Other contact surname=Tudor | |||
|Works and supervision Lead organisation=The Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve Authority, Tulcea | |||
|Post-project management and maintenance Lead organisation=The Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve Authority, Tulcea | |||
|Monitoring Lead organisation=The Danube Delta National Institute for Research and Development, Tulcea (office@indd.tim.ro) | |||
|Monitoring Other contact forename=Marian | |||
|Monitoring Other contact surname=Tudor | |||
}} | |||
{{Motivations | |||
|Specific mitigation=Flood risk management | |||
|Hydromorphological quality elements=Continuity for organisms | |||
|Biological quality elements=Fish: Species composition | |||
|Physico-chemical quality elements=Nutrient concentrations | |||
|Other motivation=Landscape enhancement,Recreation | |||
}} | |||
{{Measures | |||
|Bank and bed modifications measure=Create breaches in the bank | |||
|Floodplain / River corridor=Creation of wetland | |||
|Planform / Channel pattern=Reconnecting polder, | |||
}} | |||
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} | |||
{{Hydromorphological quality element table row | |||
|Element=Quantity & dynamics of flow | |||
|Monitored before=No | |||
|Monitored after=Yes | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=No | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=No | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
|Result=Improvement | |||
}} | |||
{{Hydromorphological quality element table row | |||
|Element=Continuity of sediment transport | |||
|Monitored before=No | |||
|Monitored after=No | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=No | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=No | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
|Result=Improvement | |||
}} | |||
{{End_table}} | |||
{{Biological quality elements header}} | |||
{{Biological quality element table row | |||
|Element=Fish: Species composition | |||
|Monitored before=Yes | |||
|Monitored after=No | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=No | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=No | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
|Result=Improvement | |||
}} | |||
{{Biological quality element table row | |||
|Element=Phytoplankton: Taxonomic composition | |||
|Monitored before=No | |||
|Monitored after=No | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=No | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=No | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
|Result=Improvement | |||
}} | |||
{{Biological quality element table row | |||
|Element=Invertebrates | |||
|Monitored before=No | |||
|Monitored after=Yes | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=No | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=No | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
}} | |||
{{Biological quality element table row | |||
|Element=Macrophytes | |||
|Monitored before=No | |||
|Monitored after=No | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=No | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=No | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
}} | |||
{{End_table}} | |||
{{Physico-chemical quality elements header}} | |||
{{Physico-chemical quality element table row | |||
|Element=Salinity | |||
|Monitored before=No | |||
|Monitored after=Yes | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=No | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=No | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
|Result=Improvement | |||
}} | |||
{{Physico-chemical quality element table row | |||
|Element=PH | |||
|Monitored before=No | |||
|Monitored after=No | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=No | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=No | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
}} | |||
{{Physico-chemical quality element table row | |||
|Element=Oxygen balance | |||
|Monitored before=No | |||
|Monitored after=No | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=No | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=No | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
}} | |||
{{Physico-chemical quality element table row | |||
|Element=Temperature | |||
|Monitored before=No | |||
|Monitored after=No | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=No | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=No | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
}} | |||
{{End_table}} | |||
{{Other responses header}} | |||
{{Other response table row | |||
|Element=Ecological tourism development | |||
|Monitored before=No | |||
|Monitored after=No | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=No | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=No | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
|Result=Improvement | |||
}} | |||
{{Other response table row | |||
|Element=Fish | |||
|Monitored before=No | |||
|Monitored after=Yes | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=No | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=No | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
}} | |||
{{Other response table row | |||
|Element=Reed | |||
|Monitored before=No | |||
|Monitored after=Yes | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=No | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=No | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
}} | |||
{{Other response table row | |||
|Element=Pasture | |||
|Monitored before=No | |||
|Monitored after=Yes | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=No | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=No | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
}} | |||
{{Other response table row | |||
|Element=Medicinal plants | |||
|Monitored before=No | |||
|Monitored after=Yes | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=No | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=No | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
}} | |||
{{End_table}} | |||
{{Monitoring documents}} | |||
{{Case study monitoring documents | |||
|Monitoring document=Development of zoobenthos in the restored polders Babina and Cernovca.pdf | |||
|Description=Development of zoobenthos in the restored polder Babina | |||
}} | |||
{{Case study monitoring documents | |||
|Monitoring document=The evolution of Babina polder after restoration works.pdf | |||
|Description=The evolution of Babina polder after restoration work | |||
}} | |||
{{Monitoring_documents_end}} | |||
{{Additional Documents}} | |||
{{Case study documents | |||
|File name=Babina and Cernovca Islands.pdf | |||
|Description=Babina and Cernovca Islands | |||
}} | |||
{{Additional_Documents_end}} | {{Additional_Documents_end}} | ||
{{ | {{Additional links and references header}} | ||
{{Additional links and references | |||
|Link=www.ddni.ro | |||
|Description=The website of The Danube Delta National Institute for Research and Development, Tulcea, Romania | |||
}} | |||
{{Additional_links_and_references_footer}} | {{Additional_links_and_references_footer}} | ||
{{Supplementary_Information | {{Supplementary_Information | ||
|Information= | |Information= | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Case_study_upload}} | {{Case_study_upload}} | ||
{{Toggle content end}} |
Latest revision as of 09:45, 2 June 2017
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Habitat and biodiversity |
Country | Romania |
Main contact forename | Marian |
Main contact surname | Tudor |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | The Danube Delta National Institute for Research and Development, Tulcea |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.ddni.ro |
Partner organisations | The Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve Authority |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
Until the 20th century vast areas of the Danube Delta faced only minimal human impacts
through extensive fishery and reed harvesting. Since then the Danube Delta has undergone
multiple human impacts like embankment, channelization and drainage. Moreover, large
areas were diked and the polders used for agriculture.
The Babina polder (2.100 ha) was reconnected to the Danube in 1994 and recovery has been monitored by the Danube Delta National Institute for Research and Development.
Within a few years a redevelopment of the site-specific biodiversity occurred and ecosystem services like nutrient retention and fish recruitment became obvious. Additionally, the reconnected polder enable reed harvesting, grazing, fishing and ecotourism.
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Other case studies in this subcatchment: The Cernovca Restoration Project
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|