Case study:The Babina Restoration Project: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(XML import)
 
No edit summary
 
(28 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Case_study_status
{{Case study status
|Approval status=Draft
|Approval status=Approved
}}
}}
{{Location
{{Location
|Location=
|Location=45.424763, 29.411763
   
   
      45.424763,29.411763
}}
}}
{{Project_overview
{{Project overview
|Status=
|Status=Complete
   
|Themes=Habitat and biodiversity
   
|Country=Romania
      Complete
|Main contact forename=Marian
|Project web site url=
|Main contact surname=Tudor
     
|Contact organisation=The Danube Delta National Institute for Research and Development, Tulcea
|Themes=
|Contact organisation url=www.ddni.ro
      Habitat and biodiversity
|Partner organisations=The Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve Authority
|Country=
|Multi-site=No
      Romania
|Project picture=Babina polder - present situation.JPG
|Main contact forename=
|Picture description=The Babina - present situation
      Marian
|Project summary=Until the 20th century vast areas of the Danube Delta faced only minimal human impacts
|Main contact surname=
through extensive fishery and reed harvesting. Since then the Danube Delta has undergone
      Tudor
multiple human impacts like embankment, channelization and drainage. Moreover, large
|Main contact id=
areas were diked and the polders used for agriculture.
     
The Babina polder (2.100 ha) was reconnected to the Danube in 1994 and recovery has been monitored by the Danube Delta National Institute for Research and Development.
|Contact organisation=
Within a few years a redevelopment of the site-specific biodiversity occurred and ecosystem services like nutrient retention and fish recruitment became obvious. Additionally, the reconnected polder enable reed harvesting, grazing, fishing and ecotourism.
      The Danube Delta National Institute for Research and Development, Tulcea (office@indd.tim.ro)
|Contact organisation url=
     
|Partner organisations=
     
|Multi-site=
     
|Name of parent multi-site project=
     
|Project picture=
     
|Picture description=
     
|Project summary=
     
}}
}}
{{Case_study_subcatchment
{{Image gallery}}
|Subcatchment=
{{Case study image
   
|File name=Babina area before restoration.jpg
   
|Caption=The Babina polder before restoration
      Chilia Branch
}}
{{Case study image
|File name=The Babina polder - after restoration works.JPG
|Caption=The Babina polder after restoration
}}
{{Case study image
|File name=Restored lake and Babina island.JPG
|Caption=Restored lake and Babina Island
}}
{{Case study image
|File name=European mink - Mustela lutreola in the restored area.JPG
|Caption=European mink (Mustela lutreola) in the restored area
}}
{{Case study image
|File name=European otter - Lutra lutra in the restored area.JPG
|Caption=European otter (Lutra lutra) in the restored area
}}
{{Case study image
|File name=Little Egret- Egretta garzetta in the restored area.JPG
|Caption=Little egret (Egretta garzetta) in the restored area
}}
{{Case study image
|File name=Satellite image of Babina area 1993.jpg
|Caption=Satellite image of Babina area (1993)
}}
{{Case study image
|File name=Satellite image of Babina area 1996.jpg
|Caption=Satellite image of Babina area (1996)
}}
{{Image_gallery_end}}
{{Toggle button}}
{{Toggle content start}}
 
{{Case study subcatchment
|Subcatchment=Chilia Branch
}}
}}
{{Site
{{Site
|Name=
|Name=Agricultural polder Babina
   
|WFD water body code=RORW14.1_B6
   
|WFD (national) typology=RO15
      Agricultural polder Babina
|Pre-project morphology=Embanked, Agricultural land
|WFD water body code=
|Reference morphology=Sinuous, Artificial channel
      RORW14.1_B6
|Heavily modified water body=No
|WFD (national) typology=
|Site designation=International - RAMSAR site
      RO15
|Local site designation=Biosphere Reserves
|WFD water body name=
|Protected species present=No
     
|Invasive species present=No
|Pre-project morphology=
|Dominant hydrology=Artificially regulated, Floodplain area
      Embanked
|Dominant substrate=Sand,Clay
|Reference morphology=
|River corridor land use=Grassland, Wetland
      Sinuous
|Average bankfull channel width category=10 - 50 m
|Heavily modified water body=
|Average bankfull channel depth category=0.5 - 2 m
     
|Avrg1 bankfull channel depth=1.95
|Local site designation=
|Mean discharge category=more than 1000 m³/s
      RAMSAR site
|Mn discharge=3606
|Site designation=
|Average channel gradient category=0.01 - 0.1
     
|Avrg channel gradient=0.015
|Protected species present=
     
|Invasive species present=
     
|Species=
     
|Dominant hydrology=
      Artificially regulated
|Dominant substrate=
      Sand,Clay
|River corridor land use=
      Grassland
|Average bankfull channel width category=
      more than 50 m
|Avrg bankfull channel width=
      340
|Average bankfull channel depth category=
     
|Avrg1 bankfull channel depth=
     
|Mean discharge category=
     
|Mn discharge=
     
|Average channel gradient category=
     
|Avrg channel gradient=
      0.015
}}
}}
{{Project_background
{{Project background
|Reach length directly affected=
|Project started=1991/01/01
   
|Works started=1994/04/01
   
|Works completed=1994/05/01
     
|Total cost category=10 - 50 k€
|Project started=
|Total1 cost=2407
      1991/01/01
|Funding sources=GEF biodiversity preservation project in the Danube Delta
|Works started=
|Investigation and design Lead organisation=The Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve Authority, Tulcea
      1994/04/01
|Investigation and design Other contact forename=Marian
|Works completed=
|Investigation and design Other contact surname=Tudor
      1994/05/01
|Stakeholder engagement Lead organisation=The Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve Authority, Tulcea
|Project completed=
|Stakeholder engagement Other contact forename=Marian
     
|Stakeholder engagement Other contact surname=Tudor
|Total cost category=
|Works and supervision Lead organisation=The Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve Authority, Tulcea
      10 - 50 k€
|Post-project management and maintenance Lead organisation=The Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve Authority, Tulcea
|Total1 cost=
|Monitoring Lead organisation=The Danube Delta National Institute for Research and Development, Tulcea (office@indd.tim.ro)
     
|Monitoring Other contact forename=Marian
|Funding sources=
|Monitoring Other contact surname=Tudor
     
|Investigation and design cost category=
     
|Invst and design cost=
     
|Investigation and design Lead organisation=
     
|Investigation and design Other contact forename=
     
|Investigation and design Other contact surname=
     
|Stakeholder1 engagement cost category=
     
|stk engagement cost=
     
|Stakeholder engagement Lead organisation=
      The Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve Authority, Tulcea
|Stakeholder engagement Other contact forename=
     
|Stakeholder engagement Other contact surname=
     
|Works1 and supervision cost category=
     
|Wrk and supervision cost=
     
|Works and supervision Lead organisation=
     
|Works and supervision Other contact forename=
     
|Works and supervision Other contact surname=
     
|Post-project1 management and maintenance cost category=
     
|Post-project2 management and maintenance cost=
     
|Post-project management and maintenance Lead organisation=
      The Danube Delta National Institute for Research and Development, Tulcea (office@indd.tim.ro)
|Post-project management and maintenance Other contact forename=
      Marian
|Post-project management and maintenance Other contact surname=
      Tudor
|Monitoring1 cost category=
     
|Monitoring2 cost=
     
|Monitoring Lead organisation=
      The Danube Delta National Institute for Research and Development, Tulcea (office@indd.tim.ro)
|Monitoring Other contact forename=
      Marian
|Monitoring Other contact surname=
      Tudor
|Supplementary funding information=
     
}}
}}
{{Motivations
{{Motivations
|Hydromorphological quality elements=
|Specific mitigation=Flood risk management
   
|Hydromorphological quality elements=Continuity for organisms
   
|Biological quality elements=Fish: Species composition
      Continuity for organisms
|Physico-chemical quality elements=Nutrient concentrations
|Biological quality elements=
|Other motivation=Landscape enhancement,Recreation
      Fish: Species composition
|Physico-chemical quality elements=
      Nutrient concentrations
|Specific mitigation=
      Flood risk management
|Other motivation=
      Landscape enhancement,Recreation
}}
}}
{{Measures
{{Measures
|Bank and bed modifications measure=
|Bank and bed modifications measure=Create breaches in the bank
   
|Floodplain / River corridor=Creation of wetland
   
|Planform / Channel pattern=Reconnecting polder,
     
|Floodplain / River corridor=
      Creation of wetlands
|Planform / Channel pattern=
      Reconnecting Babina polder to
the Danube flooded regime
|Other technical measure=
     
|Management interventions=
     
|Social measures=
     
|Wider stakeholder / citizen engagement=
     
}}
}}
{{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}}
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}}
{{Hydromorphological_quality_element_table_row
{{Hydromorphological quality element table row
|Element=
|Element=Quantity & dynamics of flow
   
|Monitored before=No
   
|Monitored after=Yes
   
|Qualitative monitoring=No
      Quantity & dynamics of flow
|Quantitative monitoring=No
|Monitored before=
|Control site used=No
     
|Result=Improvement
|Monitored after=
     
|Qualitative monitoring=
     
|Quantitative monitoring=
     
|Control site used=
     
|Result=
      Improvement
}}
}}
{{Hydromorphological_quality_element_table_row
{{Hydromorphological quality element table row
|Element=
|Element=Continuity of sediment transport
   
|Monitored before=No
   
|Monitored after=No
      Continuity of sediment transport
|Qualitative monitoring=No
|Monitored before=
|Quantitative monitoring=No
     
|Control site used=No
|Monitored after=
|Result=Improvement
     
|Qualitative monitoring=
     
|Quantitative monitoring=
     
|Control site used=
     
|Result=
      Improvement
}}
}}
{{End_table}}
{{End_table}}
{{Biological_quality_elements_header}}
{{Biological quality elements header}}
{{Biological_quality_element_table_row
{{Biological quality element table row
|Element=
|Element=Fish: Species composition
   
|Monitored before=Yes
   
|Monitored after=No
   
|Qualitative monitoring=No
   
|Quantitative monitoring=No
      Fish: Species composition
|Control site used=No
|Monitored before=
|Result=Improvement
     
}}
|Monitored after=
{{Biological quality element table row
     
|Element=Phytoplankton: Taxonomic composition
|Qualitative monitoring=
|Monitored before=No
     
|Monitored after=No
|Quantitative monitoring=
|Qualitative monitoring=No
     
|Quantitative monitoring=No
|Control site used=
|Control site used=No
     
|Result=Improvement
|Result=
      Improvement
}}
}}
{{Biological_quality_element_table_row
{{Biological quality element table row
|Element=
|Element=Invertebrates
   
|Monitored before=No
   
|Monitored after=Yes
      Phytoplankton: Taxonomic composition
|Qualitative monitoring=No
|Monitored before=
|Quantitative monitoring=No
     
|Control site used=No
|Monitored after=
}}
     
{{Biological quality element table row
|Qualitative monitoring=
|Element=Macrophytes
     
|Monitored before=No
|Quantitative monitoring=
|Monitored after=No
     
|Qualitative monitoring=No
|Control site used=
|Quantitative monitoring=No
     
|Control site used=No
|Result=
      Improvement
}}
}}
{{End_table}}
{{End_table}}
{{Physico-chemical_quality_elements_header}}
{{Physico-chemical quality elements header}}
{{Physico-chemical_quality_element_table_row
{{Physico-chemical quality element table row
|Element=
|Element=Salinity
   
|Monitored before=No
   
|Monitored after=Yes
   
|Qualitative monitoring=No
   
|Quantitative monitoring=No
      Nutrient concentrations
|Control site used=No
|Monitored before=
|Result=Improvement
     
}}
|Monitored after=
{{Physico-chemical quality element table row
     
|Element=PH
|Qualitative monitoring=
|Monitored before=No
     
|Monitored after=No
|Quantitative monitoring=
|Qualitative monitoring=No
     
|Quantitative monitoring=No
|Control site used=
|Control site used=No
     
}}
|Result=
{{Physico-chemical quality element table row
      Improvement
|Element=Oxygen balance
|Monitored before=No
|Monitored after=No
|Qualitative monitoring=No
|Quantitative monitoring=No
|Control site used=No
}}
{{Physico-chemical quality element table row
|Element=Temperature
|Monitored before=No
|Monitored after=No
|Qualitative monitoring=No
|Quantitative monitoring=No
|Control site used=No
}}
}}
{{End_table}}
{{End_table}}
{{Other_responses_header}}
{{Other responses header}}
{{Other_response_table_row
{{Other response table row
|Element=
|Element=Ecological tourism development
   
|Monitored before=No
   
|Monitored after=No
   
|Qualitative monitoring=No
   
|Quantitative monitoring=No
      Ecological tourism development
|Control site used=No
|Monitored before=
|Result=Improvement
     
}}
|Monitored after=
{{Other response table row
     
|Element=Fish
|Qualitative monitoring=
|Monitored before=No
     
|Monitored after=Yes
|Quantitative monitoring=
|Qualitative monitoring=No
     
|Quantitative monitoring=No
|Control site used=
|Control site used=No
     
}}
|Result=
{{Other response table row
      Improvement
|Element=Reed
|Monitored before=No
|Monitored after=Yes
|Qualitative monitoring=No
|Quantitative monitoring=No
|Control site used=No
}}
{{Other response table row
|Element=Pasture
|Monitored before=No
|Monitored after=Yes
|Qualitative monitoring=No
|Quantitative monitoring=No
|Control site used=No
}}
{{Other response table row
|Element=Medicinal plants
|Monitored before=No
|Monitored after=Yes
|Qualitative monitoring=No
|Quantitative monitoring=No
|Control site used=No
}}
}}
{{End_table}}
{{End_table}}
{{Monitoring_documents}}
{{Monitoring documents}}
{{Case study monitoring documents
|Monitoring document=Development of zoobenthos in the restored polders Babina and Cernovca.pdf
|Description=Development of zoobenthos in the restored polder Babina
}}
{{Case study monitoring documents
|Monitoring document=The evolution of Babina polder after restoration works.pdf
|Description=The evolution of Babina polder after restoration work
}}
{{Monitoring_documents_end}}
{{Monitoring_documents_end}}
{{Image_gallery}}
{{Additional Documents}}
{{Image_gallery_end}}
{{Case study documents
{{Additional_Documents}}
|File name=Babina and Cernovca Islands.pdf
|Description=Babina and Cernovca Islands
}}
{{Additional_Documents_end}}
{{Additional_Documents_end}}
{{Additional_links_and_references_header}}
{{Additional links and references header}}
{{Additional links and references
|Link=www.ddni.ro
|Description=The website of The Danube Delta National Institute for Research and Development, Tulcea, Romania
}}
{{Additional_links_and_references_footer}}
{{Additional_links_and_references_footer}}
{{Supplementary_Information
{{Supplementary_Information
|Information=
|Information=
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
     
}}
}}
{{Case_study_upload}}
{{Case_study_upload}}
{{Toggle content end}}

Latest revision as of 09:45, 2 June 2017

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 45° 25' 29.15" N, 29° 24' 42.35" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Habitat and biodiversity
Country Romania
Main contact forename Marian
Main contact surname Tudor
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation The Danube Delta National Institute for Research and Development, Tulcea
Contact organisation web site http://www.ddni.ro
Partner organisations The Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve Authority
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
The Babina - present situation

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


Until the 20th century vast areas of the Danube Delta faced only minimal human impacts through extensive fishery and reed harvesting. Since then the Danube Delta has undergone multiple human impacts like embankment, channelization and drainage. Moreover, large areas were diked and the polders used for agriculture. The Babina polder (2.100 ha) was reconnected to the Danube in 1994 and recovery has been monitored by the Danube Delta National Institute for Research and Development. Within a few years a redevelopment of the site-specific biodiversity occurred and ecosystem services like nutrient retention and fish recruitment became obvious. Additionally, the reconnected polder enable reed harvesting, grazing, fishing and ecotourism.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


The Babina polder before restoration
The Babina polder after restoration
Restored lake and Babina Island
European mink (Mustela lutreola) in the restored area
European otter (Lutra lutra) in the restored area
Little egret (Egretta garzetta) in the restored area
Satellite image of Babina area (1993)
Satellite image of Babina area (1996)
ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district Danube
River basin Danube Delta

Subcatchment

River name Chilia Branch
Area category Less than 10 km²
Area (km2) 2.102.1 km² <br />210 ha <br />
Maximum altitude category Less than 100 m
Maximum altitude (m) 2.42.4 m <br />0.0024 km <br />240 cm <br />
Dominant geology Organic (i.e. Peat)
Ecoregion Pontic Province
Dominant land cover Grassland, Reed
Waterbody ID



Other case studies in this subcatchment: The Cernovca Restoration Project


Site

Name Agricultural polder Babina
WFD water body codes RORW14.1_B6
WFD (national) typology RO15
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology Embanked, Agricultural land
Reference morphology Sinuous, Artificial channel
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation International - RAMSAR site
Local/regional site designations Biosphere Reserves
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology Artificially regulated, Floodplain area
Dominant substrate Sand, Clay
River corridor land use Grassland, Wetland
Average bankfull channel width category 10 - 50 m
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category 0.5 - 2 m
Average bankfull channel depth (m) 1.951.95 m <br />0.00195 km <br />195 cm <br />
Mean discharge category more than 1000 m³/s
Mean annual discharge (m3/s) 36063,606 m³/s <br />3,606,000 l/s <br />
Average channel gradient category 0.01 - 0.1
Average channel gradient 0.015
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started 1991/01/01
Works started 1994/04/01
Works completed 1994/05/01
Project completed
Total cost category 10 - 50 k€
Total cost (k€) 24072,407 k€ <br />2,407,000 € <br />
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources GEF biodiversity preservation project in the Danube Delta

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design The Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve Authority, Tulcea Marian Tudor
Stakeholder engagement and communication The Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve Authority, Tulcea Marian Tudor
Works and works supervision The Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve Authority, Tulcea
Post-project management and maintenance The Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve Authority, Tulcea
Monitoring The Danube Delta National Institute for Research and Development, Tulcea (office@indd.tim.ro) Marian Tudor



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure Flood risk management
Hydromorphology Continuity for organisms
Biology Fish: Species composition
Physico-chemical Nutrient concentrations
Other reasons for the project Landscape enhancement, Recreation


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Create breaches in the bank
Floodplain / River corridor Creation of wetland
Planform / Channel pattern Reconnecting polder
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Quantity & dynamics of flow No Yes No No No Improvement
Continuity of sediment transport No No No No No Improvement

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Fish: Species composition Yes No No No No Improvement
Phytoplankton: Taxonomic composition No No No No No Improvement
Invertebrates No Yes No No No
Macrophytes No No No No No

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Salinity No Yes No No No Improvement
PH No No No No No
Oxygen balance No No No No No
Temperature No No No No No

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Ecological tourism development No No No No No Improvement
Fish No Yes No No No
Reed No Yes No No No
Pasture No Yes No No No
Medicinal plants No Yes No No No


Monitoring documents





Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description
http://www.ddni.ro The website of The Danube Delta National Institute for Research and Development, Tulcea, Romania

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information