Case study:RSPB Fowlmere Nature Reserve: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(XML import)
 
No edit summary
 
(17 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Case_study_status
{{Case study status
|Approval status=
|Approval status=Approved
   
 
 
   
      Draft
}}
}}
{{Location
{{Location
Line 13: Line 8:
       52.09063,0.049913
       52.09063,0.049913
}}
}}
{{Project_overview
{{Project overview
|Status=
|Status=Complete
   
|Themes=Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Social benefits, Water quality
   
|Country=England
      Complete
|Main contact forename=Jenny
|Project web site url=
|Main contact surname=Mant
     
|Contact organisation=River Restoration Centre
|Themes=
|Contact organisation url=www.therrc.co.uk
      Habitat and biodiversity,Social benefits,Hydromorphology,Water quality
|Partner organisations=Environment Agency
|Country=
|Multi-site=No
      England
|Project picture=Fowlmere brushwood and faggots.jpg
|Main contact forename=
|Picture description=Faggots on the restored Fowlmere
     
|Project summary=The river had been heavily dredged in the past, resulting in a distinct lack of gravel within the river, and the channel was over-deep and filled with silt. Long profile surveys also indicated that the natural profile of the river had been significantly altered. Habitat restoration work progressed in three phases:
|Main contact surname=
 
     
- Riffle creation in March 2006 (~30m)
|Main contact id=
- Marginal habitat enhancement in 2007 (~150m)
     
- Bed raising combined with channel narrowing in 2009 (~250m)
|Contact organisation=
}}
     
{{Image gallery}}
|Contact organisation url=
{{Case study image
     
|File name=Fowlmere narrowing the channel detail.jpg
|Partner organisations=
|Caption=Narrowing of the channel at Fowlmere, April 2008
     
}}
|Multi-site=
{{Case study image
     
|File name=Fowlmere narrowing the overwide channel.jpg
|Name of parent multi-site project=
|Caption=Narrowing channel at Fowlmere, April 2008
     
|Project picture=
     
|Picture description=
     
|Project summary=
     
}}
}}
{{Image_gallery_end}}
{{Toggle button}}
{{Toggle content start}}
{{Case_study_subcatchment
{{Case_study_subcatchment
|Subcatchment=
|Subcatchment=
Line 54: Line 45:
}}
}}
{{Site
{{Site
|Name=
|Name=Fowlmere Nature Reserve
   
|WFD water body code=GB105033038080
   
|WFD water body name=Shep
      Fowlmere Nature Reserve
|Pre-project morphology=High width:depth,Single channel,Straight
|WFD water body code=
|Reference morphology=Sinuous,Pool-riffle
     
|Heavily modified water body=Yes
|WFD (national) typology=
|Protected species present=No
     
|Invasive species present=No
|WFD water body name=
|Dominant hydrology=Quick run-off
     
|Dominant substrate=Silt,Sand
|Pre-project morphology=
|River corridor land use=Grassland
      High width:depth,Single channel,Straight
|Average bankfull channel width category=2 - 5 m
|Reference morphology=
|Average bankfull channel depth category=2 - 5 m
      Sinuous,Pool-riffle
|Heavily modified water body=
      true
|Local site designation=
     
|Site designation=
     
|Protected species present=
     
|Invasive species present=
     
|Species=
     
|Dominant hydrology=
      Quick run-off
|Dominant substrate=
      Silt,Sand
|River corridor land use=
      Grassland
|Average bankfull channel width category=
      2 - 5 m
|Avrg bankfull channel width=
     
|Average bankfull channel depth category=
      2 - 5 m
|Avrg1 bankfull channel depth=
     
|Mean discharge category=
     
|Mn discharge=
     
|Average channel gradient category=
     
|Avrg channel gradient=
     
}}
}}
{{Project_background
{{Project background
|Reach length directly affected=
|Reach length directly affected=600 m
   
|Project started=2006/03/01
   
|Works completed=2009/12/01
      600 m
|Total cost category=10 - 50 k€
|Project started=
|Total1 cost=14 k€
      2006/03/01
|Funding sources=Environment Agency
|Works started=
     
|Works completed=
      2009/12/01
|Project completed=
     
|Total cost category=
      10 - 50 k€
|Total1 cost=
      14 k€
|Funding sources=
     
|Investigation and design cost category=
     
|Invst and design cost=
     
|Investigation and design Lead organisation=
     
|Investigation and design Other contact forename=
     
|Investigation and design Other contact surname=
     
|Stakeholder1 engagement cost category=
     
|stk engagement cost=
     
|Stakeholder engagement Lead organisation=
     
|Stakeholder engagement Other contact forename=
     
|Stakeholder engagement Other contact surname=
     
|Works1 and supervision cost category=
     
|Wrk and supervision cost=
     
|Works and supervision Lead organisation=
     
|Works and supervision Other contact forename=
     
|Works and supervision Other contact surname=
     
|Post-project1 management and maintenance cost category=
     
|Post-project2 management and maintenance cost=
     
|Post-project management and maintenance Lead organisation=
     
|Post-project management and maintenance Other contact forename=
     
|Post-project management and maintenance Other contact surname=
     
|Monitoring1 cost category=
     
|Monitoring2 cost=
     
|Monitoring Lead organisation=
     
|Monitoring Other contact forename=
     
|Monitoring Other contact surname=
     
|Supplementary funding information=
     
}}
}}
{{Motivations
{{Motivations
Line 190: Line 82:
}}
}}
{{Measures
{{Measures
|Bank and bed modifications measure=
|Bank and bed modifications measure=Cut back of plants,Riffle creation,Placement of log steps to prevent erosion from deer,Bed raising,Placement of faggots
   
|Floodplain / River corridor=Protect/restore riparian zone,
   
|Planform / Channel pattern=Channel narrowing, Adding sinuosity,
      Cut back of plants,Riffle creation,Placement of log steps to prevent erosion from deer,Bed raising,Placement of faggots
|Management interventions=Easier management
|Floodplain / River corridor=
      Riparian enhancement
|Planform / Channel pattern=
      Increase in sinuosity,Narrowing of channel
|Other technical measure=
     
|Management interventions=
      Easier management
|Social measures=
     
|Wider stakeholder / citizen engagement=
     
}}
}}
{{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}}
{{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}}
Line 350: Line 230:
{{Monitoring_documents}}
{{Monitoring_documents}}
{{Monitoring_documents_end}}
{{Monitoring_documents_end}}
{{Image_gallery}}
{{Image_gallery_end}}
{{Additional_Documents}}
{{Additional_Documents}}
{{Additional_Documents_end}}
{{Additional_Documents_end}}
{{Additional_links_and_references_header}}
{{Additional links and references header}}
{{Additional links and references
|Link=publications.environment-agency.gov.uk/PDF/GEAN0910BSPO-E-E.pdf
|Description=WFD Classification for River Shep - See page 231.
}}
{{Additional links and references
|Link=http://www.therrc.co.uk/case_studies/rrc%20fact%20sheet_shep%20at%20rspb%20fowlmere.pdf
|Description=River Restoration Centre Case Study
}}
{{Additional_links_and_references_footer}}
{{Additional_links_and_references_footer}}
{{Supplementary_Information
{{Supplementary_Information
Line 372: Line 258:
}}
}}
{{Case_study_upload}}
{{Case_study_upload}}
{{Toggle content end}}

Latest revision as of 15:17, 1 June 2017

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 52° 5' 26.27" N, 0° 2' 59.69" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Social benefits, Water quality
Country England
Main contact forename Jenny
Main contact surname Mant
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation River Restoration Centre
Contact organisation web site http://www.therrc.co.uk
Partner organisations Environment Agency
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Faggots on the restored Fowlmere

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


The river had been heavily dredged in the past, resulting in a distinct lack of gravel within the river, and the channel was over-deep and filled with silt. Long profile surveys also indicated that the natural profile of the river had been significantly altered. Habitat restoration work progressed in three phases:

- Riffle creation in March 2006 (~30m) - Marginal habitat enhancement in 2007 (~150m) - Bed raising combined with channel narrowing in 2009 (~250m)

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


Narrowing of the channel at Fowlmere, April 2008
Narrowing channel at Fowlmere, April 2008
ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district Anglian
River basin Cam and Ely Ouse (including South Level)

Subcatchment

River name Shep
Area category 10 - 100 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category 100 - 200 m
Maximum altitude (m) 167167 m <br />0.167 km <br />16,700 cm <br />
Dominant geology Calcareous
Ecoregion Great Britain
Dominant land cover Arable and Horticulture
Waterbody ID GB105033038080



Site

Name Fowlmere Nature Reserve
WFD water body codes GB105033038080
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name Shep
Pre-project morphology High width:depth, Single channel, Straight
Reference morphology Sinuous, Pool-riffle
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body Yes
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology Quick run-off
Dominant substrate Silt, Sand
River corridor land use Grassland
Average bankfull channel width category 2 - 5 m
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category 2 - 5 m
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m) 600 m0.6 km <br />60,000 cm <br />
Project started 2006/03/01
Works started
Works completed 2009/12/01
Project completed
Total cost category 10 - 50 k€
Total cost (k€) 14 k€14,000 € <br />
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources Environment Agency

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology Width & depth variation, Quantity & dynamics of flow, Substrate conditions
Biology Fish: Abundance, Invertebrates, Macrophytes
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project Landscape enhancement, Nature development, Recreation


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Cut back of plants, Riffle creation, Placement of log steps to prevent erosion from deer, Bed raising, Placement of faggots
Floodplain / River corridor Protect/restore riparian zone
Planform / Channel pattern Channel narrowing, Adding sinuosity
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions Easier management
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Width & depth variation Yes Yes Improvement
Quantity & dynamics of flow Yes Yes Improvement
Substrate conditions Yes Yes Improvement

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Fish: Abundance Yes Yes Yes Yes Improvement
Invertebrates Yes Yes Yes Improvement
Macrophytes Yes Yes Yes Improvement

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Public awareness of river Yes Yes Yes Improvement


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description
http://publications.environment-agency.gov.uk/PDF/GEAN0910BSPO-E-E.pdf WFD Classification for River Shep - See page 231.
http://http://www.therrc.co.uk/case studies/rrc%20fact%20sheet shep%20at%20rspb%20fowlmere.pdf River Restoration Centre Case Study

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information