Case study:Nar SSSI project: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(17 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{Case study status | ||
|Approval status= | |Approval status=Approved | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Location | {{Location | ||
Line 17: | Line 12: | ||
|Themes=Hydromorphology, Monitoring, Spatial planning | |Themes=Hydromorphology, Monitoring, Spatial planning | ||
|Country=England | |Country=England | ||
|Main contact forename= | |Main contact forename=James | ||
|Main contact surname= | |Main contact surname=Holloway | ||
|Contact organisation=River Restoration Centre | |Contact organisation=River Restoration Centre | ||
|Contact organisation url=www.therrc.co.uk | |Contact organisation url=www.therrc.co.uk | ||
Line 27: | Line 21: | ||
|Project summary=The existing river was an artificially wide channel with virtually no gradient. The existing wooden flow deflectors installed between 2002 and 2003 were insufficient in their attempts to enhance flow diversity. The project successfully narrowed the river through the construction of artificial berms mimicking those found naturally and the excavation of pools. | |Project summary=The existing river was an artificially wide channel with virtually no gradient. The existing wooden flow deflectors installed between 2002 and 2003 were insufficient in their attempts to enhance flow diversity. The project successfully narrowed the river through the construction of artificial berms mimicking those found naturally and the excavation of pools. | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{Image gallery}} | ||
| | {{Case study image | ||
|File name=Shoulder Mar 11.JPG | |||
|Caption=Deflector transformed to shoulder, March 2011 | |||
}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=Shoulder Jul 11.JPG | |||
|Caption=Deflector transformed to shoulder, July 2011 | |||
}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=Sinous Mar 11.JPG | |||
|Caption=Added sinuosity to the river, March 2011 | |||
}} | |||
{{Image_gallery_end}} | |||
{{Toggle button}} | |||
{{Toggle content start}} | |||
{{Case study subcatchment | |||
|Subcatchment=Nar to confl with Blackborough Drain | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Site | {{Site | ||
|Name=Narbough Trout Fishery | |Name=Narbough Trout Fishery | ||
|WFD water body code=GB105033047791 | |||
|WFD water body name=Nar to confl with Blackborough Drain | |||
|Pre-project morphology=Single channel, Straight, Embanked, High width:depth | |Pre-project morphology=Single channel, Straight, Embanked, High width:depth | ||
|Reference morphology=Sinuous, Pool-riffle | |Reference morphology=Sinuous, Pool-riffle | ||
Line 43: | Line 53: | ||
|Species=Water Vole | |Species=Water Vole | ||
|Dominant hydrology=Groundwater | |Dominant hydrology=Groundwater | ||
|Dominant substrate=Silt, Sand, | |Dominant substrate=Silt, Sand, | ||
|River corridor land use=Urban, Woodland, Grassland, | |River corridor land use=Urban, Woodland, Grassland, | ||
|Average bankfull channel width category=10 - 50 m | |Average bankfull channel width category=10 - 50 m | ||
|Average bankfull channel depth category=5 - 10 m | |Average bankfull channel depth category=5 - 10 m | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{Project background | ||
|Reach length directly affected= | |Reach length directly affected=1000 m | ||
|Project started=2011/02/01 | |||
|Works completed=2011/03/01 | |||
|Total1 cost=3 k€ | |||
|Project started= | |Supplementary funding information=The entire project, covering 1 km of channel, was delivered by a team of 3 people in less than 3 days and for under 3 thousand pounds. Accordingly, although early days, it seems that the Nar SSSI project can be viewed as a successful low-cost ‘quick win’ project in a constrained site. | ||
|Works completed= | |||
|Total1 cost= | |||
| | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Motivations | {{Motivations | ||
Line 135: | Line 80: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Measures | {{Measures | ||
|Bank and bed modifications measure=Creation of shoulders, | |Bank and bed modifications measure=Creation of shoulders, Embankment creation, Creation of pools, | ||
|Floodplain / River corridor=Ensure floodplains left unmodified | |Floodplain / River corridor=Ensure floodplains left unmodified | ||
|Planform / Channel pattern= | |Planform / Channel pattern=Channel narrowing, | ||
|Other technical measure=Maintain water vole habitat | |Other technical measure=Maintain water vole habitat | ||
}} | }} | ||
Line 187: | Line 132: | ||
{{Monitoring_documents}} | {{Monitoring_documents}} | ||
{{Monitoring_documents_end}} | {{Monitoring_documents_end}} | ||
{{ | {{Additional Documents}} | ||
{{Additional_Documents_end}} | {{Additional_Documents_end}} | ||
{{Additional links and references header}} | {{Additional links and references header}} | ||
{{Additional links and references | {{Additional links and references | ||
|Link= | |Link=www.therrc.co.uk/case_studies/rrc%20case%20study%20-%20narborough%202011.pdf | ||
|Description=River Restoration Centre Case Study | |Description=River Restoration Centre Case Study | ||
}} | |||
{{Additional links and references | |||
|Link=www.youtube.com/watch?v=aej4PTzf_0U&feature=plcp | |||
|Description=River Nar berm creation video | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Additional_links_and_references_footer}} | {{Additional_links_and_references_footer}} | ||
Line 219: | Line 167: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Case_study_upload}} | {{Case_study_upload}} | ||
{{Toggle content end}} |
Latest revision as of 15:04, 1 June 2017
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Hydromorphology, Monitoring, Spatial planning |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | James |
Main contact surname | Holloway |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | River Restoration Centre |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.therrc.co.uk |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
The existing river was an artificially wide channel with virtually no gradient. The existing wooden flow deflectors installed between 2002 and 2003 were insufficient in their attempts to enhance flow diversity. The project successfully narrowed the river through the construction of artificial berms mimicking those found naturally and the excavation of pools.
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Other case studies in this subcatchment: Castle Acre Rehabilitation Project, Narborough Rehabilitation Project, River Nar Castle Acre Common WEG project, River Nar Restoration Project, River Nar, Mileham River Restoration Project, West Lexham Rehabilitation Project
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Supplementary funding informationThe entire project, covering 1 km of channel, was delivered by a team of 3 people in less than 3 days and for under 3 thousand pounds. Accordingly, although early days, it seems that the Nar SSSI project can be viewed as a successful low-cost ‘quick win’ project in a constrained site.
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|