Case study:River Mun Community Nature Reserve: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 36: Line 36:
|Project started=2014/03/01
|Project started=2014/03/01
}}
}}
{{Motivations}}
{{Motivations
{{Measures}}
|Other motivation=Community demand, Lack of access
}}
{{Measures
|Floodplain / River corridor=Removal of invasive plants,
|Other technical measure=bird boxes
|Social measures=Community involvement,
}}
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}}
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}}
{{End table}}
{{End table}}

Latest revision as of 15:06, 10 January 2017

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 52° 53' 27.98" N, 1° 22' 9.87" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status In progress
Project web site http://www.norfolkriverstrust.org/trust_project/river-mun-community-nature-reserve/
Themes Habitat and biodiversity, Social benefits
Country England
Main contact forename Jonathan
Main contact surname Norfolk rivers trust
Main contact user ID User:JoshRRC
Contact organisation Norfolk Rivers Trust
Contact organisation web site
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


One of the main issues raised by the local community was that there was very little access to the river.

In partnership with local landowner Eddie Anderson Norfolk Rivers Trust have established a 13 acre nature reserve which offers local residents the opportunity to visit and help conserve this beautiful river. Since March 2014 we have been very productive and worked alongside a team of enthusiastic volunteers to carry out a variety of tasks ranging from removing invasive species to creating bird boxes.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district Anglian
River basin North Norfolk

Subcatchment

River name Mun
Area category 10 - 100 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category 100 - 200 m
Maximum altitude (m) 115115 m <br />0.115 km <br />11,500 cm <br />
Dominant geology Calcareous
Ecoregion Great Britain
Dominant land cover Arable and Horticulture
Waterbody ID GB105034055900



Other case studies in this subcatchment: Nine Chalk Rivers Project - Mun Catchment


Site

Name
WFD water body codes GB105034055900
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name Mun
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started 2014/03/01
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project Community demand, Lack of access


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor Removal of invasive plants
Planform / Channel pattern
Other bird boxes
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement) Community involvement
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information