Case study:Strategic redistribution of channel substrate: Difference between revisions
Robclapham (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(9 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Case study status | {{Case study status | ||
|Approval status= | |Approval status=Approved | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Location | {{Location | ||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
|Main contact surname=Clapham | |Main contact surname=Clapham | ||
|Contact organisation=Environment Agency | |Contact organisation=Environment Agency | ||
|Partner organisations=The Parks Trust | |||
|Multi-site=No | |Multi-site=No | ||
|Project picture=OU DND.jpg | |||
|Project summary=This project was a follow-up from a previous project (Ouzel habitat improvements). Original project used large wooden deflectors in the channel to clean underlying gravels and kickstart natural process. However, the wood used was too small, and the channel over-large and -modified for the deflectors to be instigate significant change. | |Project summary=This project was a follow-up from a previous project (Ouzel habitat improvements). Original project used large wooden deflectors in the channel to clean underlying gravels and kickstart natural process. However, the wood used was too small, and the channel over-large and -modified for the deflectors to be instigate significant change. | ||
This project used a long reach excavator to re-form the channel, creating a series of deeper pools and riffle sections, where previously the channel was wide shallow and uniform in both flow and bed morphology. | This project used a long reach excavator to re-form the channel, creating a series of deeper pools and riffle sections, where previously, the channel was wide, shallow and uniform in both flow and bed morphology. | ||
There was evidence of water vole activity at this site, therefore banks were left untouched and the 'shoulder' or pinch-point' features were detached from the bank leaving a 30 cm 'gutter'. This prevented the possibility of any water voles becoming entombed in the bank. Following the work faggot bundles will be installed in these gutters to allow gradual build up of sediment an development of vegetation in the gaps. | |||
|Monitoring surveys and results=Ongoing fish surveys are being undertaken at this location, as well as habitat assessment. | |Monitoring surveys and results=Ongoing fish surveys are being undertaken at this location, as well as habitat assessment. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Line 25: | Line 27: | ||
{{Toggle content start}} | {{Toggle content start}} | ||
{{Case study subcatchment}} | {{Case study subcatchment}} | ||
{{Site}} | {{Site | ||
{{Project background}} | |Name=River Ouzel (Open University) | ||
{{Motivations}} | |WFD water body code=GB105033037971 | ||
{{Measures}} | |WFD (national) typology=Low, Medium, Calcareous | ||
|WFD water body name=Ouzel US Caldecote Mill | |||
|Heavily modified water body=Yes | |||
|Protected species present=Yes | |||
|Invasive species present=Yes | |||
|River corridor land use=Recreation grassland / grazed | |||
|Average bankfull channel width category=5 - 10 m | |||
|Average bankfull channel depth category=0.5 - 2 m | |||
}} | |||
{{Project background | |||
|Reach length directly affected=150 | |||
|Project started=2015/10/28 | |||
|Total cost category=Less than 1 k€ | |||
|Funding sources=Parks Trust | |||
}} | |||
{{Motivations | |||
|Other motivation=Follow up from a previous project - wooden deflectors used were too small and river too wide for deflectors to cause change | |||
}} | |||
{{Measures | |||
|Bank and bed modifications measure=Long-reach excavator, Creation of pools and riffles, | |||
}} | |||
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} | {{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} | ||
{{End table}} | {{End table}} |
Latest revision as of 12:16, 20 December 2016
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Urban |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Rob |
Main contact surname | Clapham |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Environment Agency |
Contact organisation web site | |
Partner organisations | The Parks Trust |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
This project was a follow-up from a previous project (Ouzel habitat improvements). Original project used large wooden deflectors in the channel to clean underlying gravels and kickstart natural process. However, the wood used was too small, and the channel over-large and -modified for the deflectors to be instigate significant change.
This project used a long reach excavator to re-form the channel, creating a series of deeper pools and riffle sections, where previously, the channel was wide, shallow and uniform in both flow and bed morphology.
There was evidence of water vole activity at this site, therefore banks were left untouched and the 'shoulder' or pinch-point' features were detached from the bank leaving a 30 cm 'gutter'. This prevented the possibility of any water voles becoming entombed in the bank. Following the work faggot bundles will be installed in these gutters to allow gradual build up of sediment an development of vegetation in the gaps.
Monitoring surveys and results
Ongoing fish surveys are being undertaken at this location, as well as habitat assessment.
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchment
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|