Case study:3Rivers - Lumburn:Walkham:Tavy: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
}}
}}
{{Project overview
{{Project overview
|Status=Complete
|Status=In progress
|Project web site url=http://wrt.org.uk/project/3rivers-project/
|Themes=Water quality
|Themes=Water quality
|Country=England
|Country=England
|Main contact forename=Hazel
|Main contact forename=Hazel
|Main contact surname=Kendall
|Main contact surname=Kendall
|Main contact id=David chapman
|Contact organisation=West Country Rivers Trust
|Contact organisation=West Country Rivers Trust
|Contact organisation url=wrt.org.iluk
|Contact organisation url=wrt.org.iluk
|Partner organisations=Devon Wildlife Trust, South West Water, Tamar Valley AONB, Tavy Walkham and Plym Fishing Club
|Partner organisations=Devon Wildlife Trust, South West Water, Tamar Valley AONB, Tavy Walkham and Plym Fishing Club
|Multi-site=No
|Multi-site=No
|Project picture=Huckworthy bridge.JPG
|Project summary=The project focused on Water Framework Directive Failures on these three rivers which largely related to phosphate inputs.  There are a range of diffuse and point source phosphate inputs into these rivers from both rural and urban sources.  We worked with partners to contact farmers who were likely to be having impacts through their land based activities and households who may have impacts through the use of non-mains foul drainage systems.
Undertaken 26 farm visits and associated integrated farm plans.  Attended three agricultural events, delivered three agricultural demonstrations (soil decompaction, cross compliance, efficient slurry spreading - 34 farmers attending in total).  Completed three farm grants (surface water management x 2, streamside fencing) to a total value of £5230. 
Engaged with over 100 of the most vulnerable properties on non-mains drainage to disseminate information on recently introduced General Binding Rules.  Contact the local estate agents to help disseminate information on the General Binding Rules.  Contacted the caravan/ campsites in this area (8) in this regard. Contacted the relevant Parish Councils where non-mains hotspots occur and poster campaign at riverside hotspots.   
14km of river walkover surveys complete, engaging with 14 volunteers.  Planted half a hectare of native broadleaf woodland, signposted one project partner and three individuals to potential funding for woodland creation in 2016/17
 
}}
}}
{{Image gallery}}
{{Image gallery}}

Revision as of 12:03, 6 June 2016

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 50° 31' 45.52" N, 4° 9' 38.87" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status In progress
Project web site http://http://wrt.org.uk/project/3rivers-project/
Themes Water quality
Country England
Main contact forename Hazel
Main contact surname Kendall
Main contact user ID User:David chapman
Contact organisation West Country Rivers Trust
Contact organisation web site http://wrt.org.iluk
Partner organisations Devon Wildlife Trust, South West Water, Tamar Valley AONB, Tavy Walkham and Plym Fishing Club
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Project picture

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


The project focused on Water Framework Directive Failures on these three rivers which largely related to phosphate inputs. There are a range of diffuse and point source phosphate inputs into these rivers from both rural and urban sources. We worked with partners to contact farmers who were likely to be having impacts through their land based activities and households who may have impacts through the use of non-mains foul drainage systems.

Undertaken 26 farm visits and associated integrated farm plans. Attended three agricultural events, delivered three agricultural demonstrations (soil decompaction, cross compliance, efficient slurry spreading - 34 farmers attending in total). Completed three farm grants (surface water management x 2, streamside fencing) to a total value of £5230.

Engaged with over 100 of the most vulnerable properties on non-mains drainage to disseminate information on recently introduced General Binding Rules. Contact the local estate agents to help disseminate information on the General Binding Rules. Contacted the caravan/ campsites in this area (8) in this regard. Contacted the relevant Parish Councils where non-mains hotspots occur and poster campaign at riverside hotspots.

14km of river walkover surveys complete, engaging with 14 volunteers. Planted half a hectare of native broadleaf woodland, signposted one project partner and three individuals to potential funding for woodland creation in 2016/17

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information