Case study:Teddington Wharf: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Hazel Wilson (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
(8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
{{Project overview | {{Project overview | ||
|Status=Complete | |Status=Complete | ||
|Themes=Environmental flows and water resources, Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity | |||
|Country=England | |Country=England | ||
|Main contact forename=Joanna | |Main contact forename=Joanna | ||
|Main contact surname=Heisse | |Main contact surname=Heisse | ||
|Contact organisation=Environment Agency | |||
|Multi-site=No | |Multi-site=No | ||
|Project summary=Aims of project:<br>- enhanced tidal defences<br>- conservation enhancements<br>- flood storage<br><br>Work undertaken:<br>- closure of three floodgates<br>- replacement of part of river wall<br>- provision of riverside walkway<br>- planting between river edge and buildings<br>The site adjacent to the river Thames in Teddington was a famous boatyard for several decades. A mixed development was proposed on the site. However, part of the development is in the floodplain. In consultation with the environment agency it was decided to set the flood defences away from the river frontage and part of the ground flood of one buildinghas been left ‘open’ to the tide. These measures enable flood storage on the redevelopment site to be unchanged form the original site. | |Project summary=Aims of project:<br>- enhanced tidal defences<br>- conservation enhancements<br>- flood storage<br><br>Work undertaken:<br>- closure of three floodgates<br>- replacement of part of river wall<br>- provision of riverside walkway<br>- planting between river edge and buildings<br>The site adjacent to the river Thames in Teddington was a famous boatyard for several decades. A mixed development was proposed on the site. However, part of the development is in the floodplain. In consultation with the environment agency it was decided to set the flood defences away from the river frontage and part of the ground flood of one buildinghas been left ‘open’ to the tide. These measures enable flood storage on the redevelopment site to be unchanged form the original site. | ||
Line 24: | Line 26: | ||
{{Toggle_button}} | {{Toggle_button}} | ||
{{Toggle_content_start}} | {{Toggle_content_start}} | ||
{{ | {{Case study subcatchment | ||
|Subcatchment= | |Subcatchment=Thames (Egham to Teddington) | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Site | {{Site | ||
|WFD water body code=GB106039023232 | |||
|WFD water body name=Thames (Egham to Teddington) | |||
|Heavily modified water body=No | |||
|Protected species present=No | |||
|WFD water body code= | |Invasive species present=No | ||
|WFD water body name= | |||
|Heavily modified water body= | |||
|Protected species present= | |||
|Invasive species present= | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Project_background | {{Project_background | ||
Line 157: | Line 109: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Motivations | {{Motivations | ||
|Specific mitigation=Flood risk management | |||
|Other motivation=Recreation | |||
|Specific mitigation= | |||
|Other motivation= | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Measures | {{Measures | ||
|Bank and bed modifications measure= | |Bank and bed modifications measure=Removing of concrete structures | ||
|Social measures=Improved public access | |||
|Social measures= | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}} | {{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}} |
Latest revision as of 10:14, 18 February 2016
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Environmental flows and water resources, Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Joanna |
Main contact surname | Heisse |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Environment Agency |
Contact organisation web site | |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
Aims of project:
- enhanced tidal defences
- conservation enhancements
- flood storage
Work undertaken:
- closure of three floodgates
- replacement of part of river wall
- provision of riverside walkway
- planting between river edge and buildings
The site adjacent to the river Thames in Teddington was a famous boatyard for several decades. A mixed development was proposed on the site. However, part of the development is in the floodplain. In consultation with the environment agency it was decided to set the flood defences away from the river frontage and part of the ground flood of one buildinghas been left ‘open’ to the tide. These measures enable flood storage on the redevelopment site to be unchanged form the original site.
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Other case studies in this subcatchment: Broom Road Recreation Ground, Chertsey meads, Hampton Court Palace, Hurst Park, The Barge Walk, Hampton Court
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|