Case study:West Amesbury: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{Case study status |Approval status=Draft }} {{Location |Location=51.169720798962395, -1.8006420132223866 }} {{Project overview |Project title=West Amesbury |Status=Complete ...")
 
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
}}
}}
{{Project overview
{{Project overview
|Project title=West Amesbury
|Status=Complete
|Status=Complete
|Themes=Environmental flows and water resources, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology
|Themes=Environmental flows and water resources, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology
Line 15: Line 14:
|Contact organisation=Wiltshire Wildlife Trust
|Contact organisation=Wiltshire Wildlife Trust
|Contact organisation url=www.wiltshirewildlife.org
|Contact organisation url=www.wiltshirewildlife.org
|Partner organisations=Environment Agency, Natural England, Wessex Water, Wiltshire Fishery Association, The Piscatorial Society
|Name of parent multi-site project=Case_study:Strategic Framework for Restoration of the River Avon (SFfRRA)
|Multi-site=No
|Multi-site=No
|Name of parent multi-site project=Case_study:Strategic Framework for Restoration of the River Avon (SFfRRA)
|Project picture=Moor hatches site from bridge downstream David Kelly 28.05.12.JPG
|Project summary=The project’s aims were to undo the effects of detrimental physical alteration in the past, such as dredging and channelization; sediment issues; and loss of habitat for fish and plants.  These aims were tackled through the following objectives:
 
Drought proofing rivers
Mitigating climate change (hydrology, temperature) by reinstating natural processes of erosion and deposition and planting trees for shade and as a future source of natural woody debris.
 
Reducing the amount of sediment within the channel
By promoting scour of the river bed through increasing flow velocity and by installing brushwood structures to act as sediment traps, the project will improve the site for salmonid spawning as well as helping to maintain the signature ‘gin clear’ waters of a chalk stream.
 
Create habitat for fish, plants
The structures installed in this project are aimed to provide habitat for a variety of plants, fish, invertebrates, birds and mammals, either through the introduction of food in the form of woody debris and leaf matter, or the provision of spawning habitat and cover.
 
|Monitoring surveys and results=The project site is being monitored by the Piscatorial Society. Monitoring involves invertebrate sampling, electro-fish survey and fixed point photography. Results have yet to be analysed.
|Lessons learn=Archaeological considerations and heavy rainfall/flooding both caused considerable delay and a change in the scope of this project. Due to the proximity of the Stonehenge World Heritage site, English Heritage was not happy with the original restoration plan, so the project was delayed to re-plan. During this time the area received record rainfall, leading to flooding which prevented work from being undertaken.  For future projects, further time should be allowed to fully investigate potential archaeological issues and allow for bad weather/environmental delays.
 
}}
}}
{{Image gallery}}
{{Image gallery}}

Revision as of 12:19, 17 February 2016

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 51° 10' 10.99" N, 1° 48' 2.31" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Environmental flows and water resources, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology
Country England
Main contact forename Martijn
Main contact surname Antheunisse
Main contact user ID User:Martijnantheunisse
Contact organisation Wiltshire Wildlife Trust
Contact organisation web site http://www.wiltshirewildlife.org
Partner organisations Environment Agency, Natural England, Wessex Water, Wiltshire Fishery Association, The Piscatorial Society
Parent multi-site project

Case_study:Strategic Framework for Restoration of the River Avon (SFfRRA)

This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Project picture

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


The project’s aims were to undo the effects of detrimental physical alteration in the past, such as dredging and channelization; sediment issues; and loss of habitat for fish and plants. These aims were tackled through the following objectives:

Drought proofing rivers Mitigating climate change (hydrology, temperature) by reinstating natural processes of erosion and deposition and planting trees for shade and as a future source of natural woody debris.

Reducing the amount of sediment within the channel By promoting scour of the river bed through increasing flow velocity and by installing brushwood structures to act as sediment traps, the project will improve the site for salmonid spawning as well as helping to maintain the signature ‘gin clear’ waters of a chalk stream.

Create habitat for fish, plants The structures installed in this project are aimed to provide habitat for a variety of plants, fish, invertebrates, birds and mammals, either through the introduction of food in the form of woody debris and leaf matter, or the provision of spawning habitat and cover.

Monitoring surveys and results

Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.


The project site is being monitored by the Piscatorial Society. Monitoring involves invertebrate sampling, electro-fish survey and fixed point photography. Results have yet to be analysed.

Lessons learnt

Edit project overview to modify the lessons learnt.


Archaeological considerations and heavy rainfall/flooding both caused considerable delay and a change in the scope of this project. Due to the proximity of the Stonehenge World Heritage site, English Heritage was not happy with the original restoration plan, so the project was delayed to re-plan. During this time the area received record rainfall, leading to flooding which prevented work from being undertaken. For future projects, further time should be allowed to fully investigate potential archaeological issues and allow for bad weather/environmental delays.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information