Case study:River Wandle: Butter Hill Phase 3: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{Case study status |Approval status=Draft }} {{Location |Location=51.370370764554885, -0.15993366949260235 }} {{Project overview |Project title=River Wandle: Butter Hill Phas...")
 
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
}}
}}
{{Project overview
{{Project overview
|Project title=River Wandle: Butter Hill Phase 3
|Status=Complete
|Status=Complete
|Themes=Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity, Social benefits, Urban
|Themes=Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity, Social benefits, Urban
Line 14: Line 13:
|Contact organisation=Wandle Trust
|Contact organisation=Wandle Trust
|Contact organisation url=www.wandletrust.org
|Contact organisation url=www.wandletrust.org
|Partner organisations=Environment Agency, Defra, Thames Water, National Lottery's Heritage Lottery Fund
|Name of parent multi-site project=Case_study:Butter Hill restoration project, River Wandle
|Multi-site=No
|Multi-site=No
|Name of parent multi-site project=Case_study:Butter Hill restoration project, River Wandle
|Project picture=Butter Hill Phase 3.png
|Picture description=Before & After Butter Hill Phase 3 Works © Wandle Trust
|Project summary=This Project is part of a larger scheme with the overall aim of establishing a population of brown trout in the Carshalton arm of the River Wandle for the first time in over 80 years. For more background on this larger scheme, please refer to the parent project "River Wandle Restoration Project".
 
Flood risk and hydraulic assessment of the weir and fish pass were carried out in conjunction with Matt Horritt Consulting. Works were delivered with the help of appointed contractors Aquamaintain Ltd under the supervision of South East Rivers Trust staff.
 
The weir at Butter Hill bridge was partially lowered to restore natural flow to the upstream channel and the fish pass modified to improve its efficiency.
 
Upstream of the weir the over-straight, over-wide channel was narrowed and modified to create a meandering sequence using a combination of gravel, hazel faggots, chestnut posts and coir geotextile with silt from the channel and brash as backfill.
 
The banks on both sides of the channel were then re-graded to create marginal and transitional habitats. A variety of marginal plant species were introduced to assist with naturalisation by a team of 15 volunteers.
 
Downstream, for 300 m, channel narrowing and meandering was continued and gravel and Large Woody Debris was introduced along the whole reach to further diversify the river flow and replicate natural hydromorphological processes, creating habitats for invertebrates and all life stages of fish.
 
Trees were also removed in phases over a two year period to increase light in selected places and encourage plant growth along the whole 500 m reach.
 
 
|Monitoring surveys and results=Please see the parent project (River Wandle Restoration Project) for the final results on this work, combined with the other phases.
}}
}}
{{Image gallery}}
{{Image gallery}}

Revision as of 14:45, 9 February 2016

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 51° 22' 13.33" N, 0° 9' 35.76" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity, Social benefits, Urban
Country England
Main contact forename Tim
Main contact surname Longstaff
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Wandle Trust
Contact organisation web site http://www.wandletrust.org
Partner organisations Environment Agency, Defra, Thames Water, National Lottery's Heritage Lottery Fund
Parent multi-site project

Case_study:Butter Hill restoration project, River Wandle

This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Before & After Butter Hill Phase 3 Works © Wandle Trust

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


This Project is part of a larger scheme with the overall aim of establishing a population of brown trout in the Carshalton arm of the River Wandle for the first time in over 80 years. For more background on this larger scheme, please refer to the parent project "River Wandle Restoration Project".

Flood risk and hydraulic assessment of the weir and fish pass were carried out in conjunction with Matt Horritt Consulting. Works were delivered with the help of appointed contractors Aquamaintain Ltd under the supervision of South East Rivers Trust staff.   The weir at Butter Hill bridge was partially lowered to restore natural flow to the upstream channel and the fish pass modified to improve its efficiency.

Upstream of the weir the over-straight, over-wide channel was narrowed and modified to create a meandering sequence using a combination of gravel, hazel faggots, chestnut posts and coir geotextile with silt from the channel and brash as backfill.   The banks on both sides of the channel were then re-graded to create marginal and transitional habitats. A variety of marginal plant species were introduced to assist with naturalisation by a team of 15 volunteers.

Downstream, for 300 m, channel narrowing and meandering was continued and gravel and Large Woody Debris was introduced along the whole reach to further diversify the river flow and replicate natural hydromorphological processes, creating habitats for invertebrates and all life stages of fish.

Trees were also removed in phases over a two year period to increase light in selected places and encourage plant growth along the whole 500 m reach.

Monitoring surveys and results

Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.


Please see the parent project (River Wandle Restoration Project) for the final results on this work, combined with the other phases.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information