Case study:Fordmill weir: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
Hazel Wilson (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
(8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
{{Project overview | {{Project overview | ||
|Status=Planned | |Status=Planned | ||
|Themes=Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity | |||
|Country=England | |Country=England | ||
|Main contact forename=Peter | |Main contact forename=Peter | ||
Line 20: | Line 21: | ||
|Contact organisation url=www.gov.uk/government/organisations/environment-agency | |Contact organisation url=www.gov.uk/government/organisations/environment-agency | ||
|Multi-site=No | |Multi-site=No | ||
|Project summary=Habitat restoration for the entire length, along with removing or modifying the weir to improve passage. Large step in river bed forming a 400mm weir, a major impediment to elver migration. Long length of overwide concrete bank and bed. | |Project summary=Habitat restoration for the entire length, along with removing or modifying the weir to improve passage. Large step in river bed forming a 400mm weir, a major impediment to elver migration. Long length of overwide concrete bank and bed.<br>Still waiting to confirm funding | ||
|Monitoring surveys and results=Pre-project data | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Image_gallery}} | {{Image_gallery}} | ||
Line 26: | Line 28: | ||
{{Toggle_button}} | {{Toggle_button}} | ||
{{Toggle_content_start}} | {{Toggle_content_start}} | ||
{{ | {{Case study subcatchment | ||
|Subcatchment= | |Subcatchment=Ravensbourne (Keston to Catford) | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Site | {{Site | ||
|WFD water body code=GB106039023260 | |||
|WFD water body name=Ravensbourne (Keston to Catford) | |||
|Heavily modified water body=No | |||
|Protected species present=No | |||
|WFD water body code= | |Invasive species present=No | ||
|WFD water body name= | |||
|Heavily modified water body= | |||
|Protected species present= | |||
|Invasive species present= | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{Project background | ||
|Funding sources=Still to be confirmed | |||
|Funding sources= | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Motivations | {{Motivations | ||
| | |Specific mitigation=Barriers to fish migration, Impoundments (not hydropower) | ||
|Biological quality elements=Fish | |||
|Biological quality elements= | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Measures | {{Measures | ||
|Bank and bed modifications measure= | |Bank and bed modifications measure=Bank reprofiling, Removing of concrete structures, Weir removal | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}} | {{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}} |
Latest revision as of 09:56, 27 October 2015
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Location: 51° 26' 13.43" N, 0° 1' 20.03" W
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.
Project overview
Status | Planned |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Peter |
Main contact surname | Gray |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Environment Agency |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/environment-agency |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.
Project summary
Edit project overview to modify the project summary.
Habitat restoration for the entire length, along with removing or modifying the weir to improve passage. Large step in river bed forming a 400mm weir, a major impediment to elver migration. Long length of overwide concrete bank and bed.
Still waiting to confirm funding
Monitoring surveys and results
Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.
Pre-project data
Lessons learnt
This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Other case studies in this subcatchment: Downham Playing Fields, Norman Park Bromley., Ravensbourne at Queensmead
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|