Case study:River Wandle: Silt & SuDs: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 89: Line 89:
}}
}}
{{Project background
{{Project background
|Project started=2012/07/01
|Project completed=2015/03/31
|Funding sources=Defra Catchment Restoration Fund
|Funding sources=Defra Catchment Restoration Fund
}}
}}

Revision as of 12:07, 6 May 2015

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 51° 22' 14.47" N, 0° 9' 34.59" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status In progress
Project web site
Themes Flood risk management, Hydromorphology, Social benefits, Water quality, Urban
Country England
Main contact forename Bella
Main contact surname Davies
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Wandle Trust
Contact organisation web site
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


The overall aim of the project is to improve the ecological potential of the Wandle water bodies by reducing the impact of man-made structures on the river’s ecology, restoring natural features and processes and reducing the impact of urban diffuse pollution. To reduce urban diffuse pollution, five innovative measures were installed and trialled to determine their effectiveness for mitigation of urban diffuse pollution, particularly road runoff:

Rain Gardens installed to intercept surface water and aesthetically enhance an area in Hackbridge. Downstream Defenders (DD) intercept surface water drains and remove sediment by centrifugal forces. Mycofiletrs are bags full of a substrate as a feedstock for the native oyster mushroom which accumulate toxins such as heavy metals from the passing water. Siltex is a natural chalk like substance which helps to increase the speed of silt breakdown by stimulating natural processes. Smart Sponges are a commercial product specially designed to absorb oils mixed in the water. When placed in gully pots, Smart Sponges can permanently remove oils from the drainage system before they enter the rivers.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district Thames
River basin London

Subcatchment

River name Wandle (Carshalton Branch at Carshalton)
Area category 10 - 100 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category 100 - 200 m
Maximum altitude (m) 160160 m <br />0.16 km <br />16,000 cm <br />
Dominant geology Calcareous
Ecoregion Great Britain
Dominant land cover Suburban
Waterbody ID GB106039017640



Other case studies in this subcatchment: Butter Hill Phase 2, River Wandle Restoration Project, River Wandle: Butter Hill Phase 1, River Wandle: Silt & SuDs, Wandle River Restoration Project: Hackbridge


Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started 2012/07/01
Works started
Works completed
Project completed 2015/03/31
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources Defra Catchment Restoration Fund

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure Pollution incident, Flood risk management, Urbanisation
Hydromorphology Substrate conditions
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Reduce diffuse pollution
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement) Community involvement
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents




Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information