Case study:Ironbridge Farm: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 29: Line 29:
}}
}}
{{Site}}
{{Site}}
{{Project background}}
{{Project background
|Reach length directly affected=250
|Project started=2012/04/01
|Works started=2016/08/07
|Investigation and design Lead organisation=Essex Wildlife Trust
|Investigation and design Other contact forename=Kieren
|Investigation and design Other contact surname=Alexander
|Stakeholder engagement Lead organisation=Essex Wildlife Trust
|Stakeholder engagement Other contact forename=Kieren
|Stakeholder engagement Other contact surname=Alexander
|Works and supervision Lead organisation=Essex Wildlife Trust
|Works and supervision Other contact forename=Kieren
|Works and supervision Other contact surname=Alexander
|Post-project management and maintenance Lead organisation=Essex Wildlife Trust
|Post-project management and maintenance Other contact forename=Kieren
|Post-project management and maintenance Other contact surname=Alexander
|Monitoring Lead organisation=Essex Wildlife Trust
|Monitoring Other contact forename=Kieren
|Monitoring Other contact surname=Alexander
}}
{{Motivations
{{Motivations
|Other motivation=Habitat creation, Landscape enhancement,  
|Other motivation=Habitat creation, Landscape enhancement,  

Revision as of 14:39, 28 April 2015

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 51° 55' 41.94" N, 0° 31' 6.19" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status In progress
Project web site http://www.essexrivershub.co.uk
Themes Habitat and biodiversity, Water quality
Country England
Main contact forename Kieren
Main contact surname Alexander
Main contact user ID User:KierenAlexander
Contact organisation Essex Wildlife Trust
Contact organisation web site http://http://www.essexrivershub.org.uk/
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
The wet woodland will be enhanced

Project summary

This case study hasn’t got any project summary, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district Anglian
River basin Combined Essex

Subcatchment

River name Blackwater Pant
Area category 10 - 100 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category Less than 100 m
Maximum altitude (m) 6868 m <br />0.068 km <br />6,800 cm <br />
Dominant geology Calcareous
Ecoregion Great Britain
Dominant land cover Arable and Horticulture
Waterbody ID GB105037033860



Other case studies in this subcatchment: Bocking Blackwater River Restoration


Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m) 250250 m <br />0.25 km <br />25,000 cm <br />
Project started 2012/04/01
Works started 2016/08/07
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design Essex Wildlife Trust Kieren Alexander
Stakeholder engagement and communication Essex Wildlife Trust Kieren Alexander
Works and works supervision Essex Wildlife Trust Kieren Alexander
Post-project management and maintenance Essex Wildlife Trust Kieren Alexander
Monitoring Essex Wildlife Trust Kieren Alexander



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project Habitat creation, Landscape enhancement


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information