Case study:Ouzel habitat improvement: Difference between revisions
Robclapham (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Robclapham (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 98: | Line 98: | ||
{{End table}} | {{End table}} | ||
{{Biological quality elements header}} | {{Biological quality elements header}} | ||
{{Biological quality element table row | |||
|Element=Fish | |||
|Monitored before=Yes | |||
|Monitored after=No | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=No | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=Yes | |||
|Control site used=Yes | |||
}} | |||
{{End table}} | {{End table}} | ||
{{Physico-chemical quality elements header}} | {{Physico-chemical quality elements header}} |
Revision as of 09:48, 17 October 2014
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Rob |
Main contact surname | Clapham |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Environment Agency |
Contact organisation web site | |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
Section of the Ouzel in Milton Keynes. The river has modified in the past, for example, channelization works have created a more uniform channel cutting off meanders and reducing hydromorphological diversity in flow and channel bed forms.
Works over an 80m section included 3 single and 1 paired deflector. The aim of these works was to increase diversity of flows and bed profile over this section. It is anticipated that over time, underlying gravels, currently overlaid by fine sediment will be kicked up by localised scour (from deflectors) and also improve habitat quality for invertebrates and for fish spawning.
Monitoring surveys and results
Pre-enhancement fish survey undertaken. Post-enhancement surveys planned.
River habitat assessment survey (Central Habitat Assessment)
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchment
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|