Case study:Stoney Sluice, Brentford eel pass: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
Post Project Appraisal | Post Project Appraisal | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{Image gallery}} | ||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=91447302.jpg | |||
}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=91447303.jpg | |||
}} | |||
{{Image_gallery_end}} | {{Image_gallery_end}} | ||
{{Toggle_button}} | {{Toggle_button}} |
Revision as of 13:40, 10 October 2014
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Fisheries |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Chris |
Main contact surname | Cockel |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Thames Rivers Trust |
Contact organisation web site | |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
Facilitate the passage of elvers around Stoney Sluice, Brentford A Canal and River Trust asset. A desire to improve the River Brent in all aspects, but particularly for fish health and connectivity.
Monitoring surveys and results
By May 2013, over 1200 eels had passed through this pass.
Post Project Appraisal
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Other case studies in this subcatchment: Boston Manor, Brent Lodge Park Improvement, Brent River Park Phase II, Clitherow's Island, Brentford eel pass, Osterley Weir, Hanwell eel pass, Stonebridge Estate, Thames Lock Weir, Brentford eel pass
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|