Case study:Pipeline and WFD Project 2: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{Case study status |Approval status=Draft }} {{Location |Location=51.86616840000001, -2.7867131000000427 }} {{Project overview |Project title=Pipeline and WFD Project |Status...")
 
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Case study status
{{Case study status
|Approval status=Draft
|Approval status=Approved
}}
}}
{{Location
{{Location
Line 6: Line 6:
}}
}}
{{Project overview
{{Project overview
|Project title=Pipeline and WFD Project
|Status=Complete
|Status=Complete
|Project web site url=www.wyeuskfoundation.org/projects/pipeline.php
|Themes=Habitat and biodiversity, Land use management - agriculture, Water quality
|Themes=Habitat and biodiversity, Land use management - agriculture, Water quality
|Country=England, Wales
|Country=England, Wales
Line 14: Line 14:
|Contact organisation=Wye & Usk Foundation
|Contact organisation=Wye & Usk Foundation
|Contact organisation url=www.wyeuskfoundation.org/
|Contact organisation url=www.wyeuskfoundation.org/
|Partner organisations= Monnow Fisheries Association
|Multi-site=No
|Multi-site=No
|Project picture=Pipeline-pic2.jpg
|Picture description=Revetment work to prevent erosion on the upper Wye tributary, the Clywedog, carried out with funding from WFD.
|Project summary=The Foundation was very fortunate to secure funding at a time when our substantial ERDF projects had been completed. This enabled the momentum of our habitat restoration to continue. The National Grid Enhancement Fund (christened the "Pipeline Project") and The Water Framework Directive Fund both made substantial contributions towards river restoration. For the first time, we engaged with the Monnow Fisheries Association to undertake habitat restoration in parts of the Monnow catchment.
Both these projects enabled us to target areas across the catchments that were in most urgent need of restoration. Both finished in 2009 and we attach detailed reports of actions taken as two PDFs:
http://www.wyeuskfoundation.org/projects/WUF-Report-on-National-Grid-Enhancement-Projects-2009.pdf
http://www.wyeuskfoundation.org/projects/WUF-Report-WFD-2009.pdf
}}
}}
{{Image gallery}}
{{Image gallery}}
Line 23: Line 33:
{{Site}}
{{Site}}
{{Project background}}
{{Project background}}
{{Motivations}}
{{Motivations
{{Measures}}
|Specific mitigation=habitat degradation
}}
{{Measures
|Bank and bed modifications measure=Revetment work, Fencing,
}}
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}}
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}}
{{End table}}
{{End table}}

Latest revision as of 09:18, 29 September 2014

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 51° 51' 58.21" N, 2° 47' 12.17" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site http://www.wyeuskfoundation.org/projects/pipeline.php
Themes Habitat and biodiversity, Land use management - agriculture, Water quality
Country England, Wales
Main contact forename Stephen
Main contact surname Marsh-Smith
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Wye & Usk Foundation
Contact organisation web site http://www.wyeuskfoundation.org/
Partner organisations Monnow Fisheries Association
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Revetment work to prevent erosion on the upper Wye tributary, the Clywedog, carried out with funding from WFD.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


The Foundation was very fortunate to secure funding at a time when our substantial ERDF projects had been completed. This enabled the momentum of our habitat restoration to continue. The National Grid Enhancement Fund (christened the "Pipeline Project") and The Water Framework Directive Fund both made substantial contributions towards river restoration. For the first time, we engaged with the Monnow Fisheries Association to undertake habitat restoration in parts of the Monnow catchment.

Both these projects enabled us to target areas across the catchments that were in most urgent need of restoration. Both finished in 2009 and we attach detailed reports of actions taken as two PDFs:

http://www.wyeuskfoundation.org/projects/WUF-Report-on-National-Grid-Enhancement-Projects-2009.pdf

http://www.wyeuskfoundation.org/projects/WUF-Report-WFD-2009.pdf

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure habitat degradation
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Revetment work, Fencing
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information