Case study:Kirkstall Valley Weir Fish Passes Project: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 60: Line 60:
|Project started=2012/08/09
|Project started=2012/08/09
|Works started=2014/03/25
|Works started=2014/03/25
|Works completed=2014/07/31
|Works completed=2014/06/25
|Total cost category=100 - 500 k€
|Total cost category=100 - 500 k€
|Total1 cost=slightly under 500
|Total1 cost=slightly under 500
Line 70: Line 70:
|Works and supervision Other contact forename=John
|Works and supervision Other contact forename=John
|Works and supervision Other contact surname=Bailey
|Works and supervision Other contact surname=Bailey
|Post-project management and maintenance Lead organisation=Leeds City Council  
|Post-project management and maintenance Lead organisation=Leeds City Council
|Post-project management and maintenance Other contact forename=Peter
|Post-project management and maintenance Other contact forename=Peter
|Post-project management and maintenance Other contact surname=Davis
|Post-project management and maintenance Other contact surname=Davis

Revision as of 16:34, 4 July 2014

3.00
(one vote)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 53° 48' 44.13" N, 1° 36' 0.82" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status In progress
Project web site
Themes Environmental flows and water resources, Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity, Social benefits, Urban
Country England
Main contact forename Kevin
Main contact surname Sunderland
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation The Aire Rivers Trust
Contact organisation web site http://www.aireriverstrust.org
Partner organisations Environment Agency, Canoe England, Aire Action Leeds, Leeds City Council and the West Yorkshire CARP Group
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
River Aire - St Ann's Mill Weir c.The Aire Rivers Trust

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


The outcome of the project is the improvement for fish passage around Kirkstall Island on the River Aire in Leeds by provision of fish passes at St Ann's Mills weir and Burley Mills weir. The fish passes will also benefit the other species which already inhabit the river but are prevented from reaching optimal spawning and feeding grounds.

The weirs are both situated on the left side channel (looking downstream) of Kirkstall Island. There are two weirs on the right side channel but careful consideration has led to the belief that fish will use the left side where the heavier flow is located.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


Map of the area
River Aire - Burley Mills c.The Aire Rivers Trust
Fish pass site at Burley Mills Weir (before construction - July 2013) c.The Aire Rivers Trust
Burley Mills Weir (before construction - July 2013) c.The Aire Rivers Trust
Completed fish pass (June 2014) at St Ann's Mills, River Aire c.The Aire Rivers Trust
Completed Fish Pass (June 2014) at Burley Mills, River Aire c. The Aire Rivers Trust
River Aire - Burley Mills Fish Pass from far bank.
ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district Humber
River basin Aire and Calder

Subcatchment

River name Aire from Esholt STW to River Calder
Area category 100 - 1000 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category 200 - 500 m
Maximum altitude (m) 233233 m <br />0.233 km <br />23,300 cm <br />
Dominant geology Calcareous
Ecoregion Great Britain
Dominant land cover Suburban
Waterbody ID GB104027063032



Other case studies in this subcatchment: Rodley weir by pass channel


Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started 2012/08/09
Works started 2014/03/25
Works completed 2014/06/25
Project completed
Total cost category 100 - 500 k€
Total cost (k€) slightly under 500"slightlyunder" is not declared as a valid unit of measurement for this property.
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources Defra Catchment Restoration Fund

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design Fishtek Consulting Toby Coe
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision Bailey Construction (NW) Ltd John Bailey
Post-project management and maintenance Leeds City Council Peter Davis
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure Barriers to fish migration, Impoundments (not hydropower)
Hydromorphology
Biology Fish: Species composition
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor The construction of two fish passes
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement) Community involvement
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents




Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information